Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain: A systematic literature review

Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Neil Hagen, Augusto Caraceni, Stein Kaasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Temporal variations in cancer pain intensity are highly prevalent, and are often difficult to manage. However, the phenomenon is not well understood: several definitions and approaches to classification and bedside assessment of cancer breakthrough pain (BTP) have been described. The present study is a systematic review of published literature on cancer BTP to answer the following questions: which terms and definitions have been used; are there validated assessment tools; which domains of BTP do the tools delineate, and which items do they contain; how have assessment tools been applied within clinical studies; and are there validated classification systems for BTP. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was performed using five major databases. Of 375 titles and abstracts initially identified, 51 articles were examined in detail. Analysis of these publications indicates a range of overlapping but distinct definitions have been used to characterize BTP; 42 of the included papers presented one or more ways of classifying BTP; and while 10 tools to assess patients' experience of BTP were identified, only 2 have been partially validated. We conclude that there is no widely accepted definition, classification system or well-validated assessment tool for cancer-related breakthrough pain, but there is strong concurrence on most of its key attributes. With further work in this area, an internationally agreed upon definition and classification system for cancer-related breakthrough pain, and a standard approach on how to measure it, hold the promise to improve patient care and support research in this poor-prognosis cancer pain syndrome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-482
Number of pages7
JournalPain
Volume149
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Breakthrough Pain
Cancer Pain
Publications
Patient Care
Databases

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Breakthrough pain
  • Cancer
  • Cancer pain
  • Classification
  • Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain : A systematic literature review. / Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg; Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen; Hagen, Neil; Caraceni, Augusto; Kaasa, Stein.

In: Pain, Vol. 149, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 476-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg ; Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen ; Hagen, Neil ; Caraceni, Augusto ; Kaasa, Stein. / Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain : A systematic literature review. In: Pain. 2010 ; Vol. 149, No. 3. pp. 476-482.
@article{421503d4bf144239ade22f84c35dec6c,
title = "Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain: A systematic literature review",
abstract = "Temporal variations in cancer pain intensity are highly prevalent, and are often difficult to manage. However, the phenomenon is not well understood: several definitions and approaches to classification and bedside assessment of cancer breakthrough pain (BTP) have been described. The present study is a systematic review of published literature on cancer BTP to answer the following questions: which terms and definitions have been used; are there validated assessment tools; which domains of BTP do the tools delineate, and which items do they contain; how have assessment tools been applied within clinical studies; and are there validated classification systems for BTP. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was performed using five major databases. Of 375 titles and abstracts initially identified, 51 articles were examined in detail. Analysis of these publications indicates a range of overlapping but distinct definitions have been used to characterize BTP; 42 of the included papers presented one or more ways of classifying BTP; and while 10 tools to assess patients' experience of BTP were identified, only 2 have been partially validated. We conclude that there is no widely accepted definition, classification system or well-validated assessment tool for cancer-related breakthrough pain, but there is strong concurrence on most of its key attributes. With further work in this area, an internationally agreed upon definition and classification system for cancer-related breakthrough pain, and a standard approach on how to measure it, hold the promise to improve patient care and support research in this poor-prognosis cancer pain syndrome.",
keywords = "Assessment, Breakthrough pain, Cancer, Cancer pain, Classification, Review",
author = "Haugen, {Dagny Faksv{\aa}g} and Hjermstad, {Marianne Jensen} and Neil Hagen and Augusto Caraceni and Stein Kaasa",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.035",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "476--482",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain

T2 - A systematic literature review

AU - Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg

AU - Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen

AU - Hagen, Neil

AU - Caraceni, Augusto

AU - Kaasa, Stein

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Temporal variations in cancer pain intensity are highly prevalent, and are often difficult to manage. However, the phenomenon is not well understood: several definitions and approaches to classification and bedside assessment of cancer breakthrough pain (BTP) have been described. The present study is a systematic review of published literature on cancer BTP to answer the following questions: which terms and definitions have been used; are there validated assessment tools; which domains of BTP do the tools delineate, and which items do they contain; how have assessment tools been applied within clinical studies; and are there validated classification systems for BTP. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was performed using five major databases. Of 375 titles and abstracts initially identified, 51 articles were examined in detail. Analysis of these publications indicates a range of overlapping but distinct definitions have been used to characterize BTP; 42 of the included papers presented one or more ways of classifying BTP; and while 10 tools to assess patients' experience of BTP were identified, only 2 have been partially validated. We conclude that there is no widely accepted definition, classification system or well-validated assessment tool for cancer-related breakthrough pain, but there is strong concurrence on most of its key attributes. With further work in this area, an internationally agreed upon definition and classification system for cancer-related breakthrough pain, and a standard approach on how to measure it, hold the promise to improve patient care and support research in this poor-prognosis cancer pain syndrome.

AB - Temporal variations in cancer pain intensity are highly prevalent, and are often difficult to manage. However, the phenomenon is not well understood: several definitions and approaches to classification and bedside assessment of cancer breakthrough pain (BTP) have been described. The present study is a systematic review of published literature on cancer BTP to answer the following questions: which terms and definitions have been used; are there validated assessment tools; which domains of BTP do the tools delineate, and which items do they contain; how have assessment tools been applied within clinical studies; and are there validated classification systems for BTP. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was performed using five major databases. Of 375 titles and abstracts initially identified, 51 articles were examined in detail. Analysis of these publications indicates a range of overlapping but distinct definitions have been used to characterize BTP; 42 of the included papers presented one or more ways of classifying BTP; and while 10 tools to assess patients' experience of BTP were identified, only 2 have been partially validated. We conclude that there is no widely accepted definition, classification system or well-validated assessment tool for cancer-related breakthrough pain, but there is strong concurrence on most of its key attributes. With further work in this area, an internationally agreed upon definition and classification system for cancer-related breakthrough pain, and a standard approach on how to measure it, hold the promise to improve patient care and support research in this poor-prognosis cancer pain syndrome.

KW - Assessment

KW - Breakthrough pain

KW - Cancer

KW - Cancer pain

KW - Classification

KW - Review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952104168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952104168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.035

DO - 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 20236762

AN - SCOPUS:77952104168

VL - 149

SP - 476

EP - 482

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 3

ER -