Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients

Davide Chiumello, Silvia Mongodi, Ilaria Algieri, Giordano Luca Vergani, Anita Orlando, Gabriele Via, Francesco Crimella, Massimo Cressoni, Francesco Mojoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Lung ultrasound is commonly used to evaluate lung morphology in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Aim of this study was to determine lung ultrasound reliability in assessing lung aeration and positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment compared with CT.

DESIGN: Randomized crossover study.

SETTING: University hospital ICU.

PATIENTS: Twenty sedated paralyzed acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: age 56 years (43-72 yr), body mass index 25 kg/m (22-27 kg/m), and PaO2/FIO2 160 (113-218).

INTERVENTIONS: Lung CT and lung ultrasound examination were performed at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 and 15 cm H2O.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Global and regional Lung Ultrasound scores were compared with CT quantitative analysis. Lung recruitment (i.e., decrease in not aerated tissue as assessed with CT) was compared with global Lung Ultrasound score variations. Global Lung Ultrasound score was strongly associated with average lung tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (R = 0.78; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (R = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Regional Lung Ultrasound score strongly correlated with tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001). Each step increase of regional Lung Ultrasound score was associated with significant increase of tissue density (p < 0.005). A substantial agreement was found between regional Lung Ultrasound score and CT classification at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (k = 0.69 [0.63-0.75]) and at positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (k = 0.70 [0.64-0.75]). At positive end-expiratory pressure 15, both global Lung Ultrasound score (22 [16-27] vs 26 [21-29]; p < 0.0001) and not aerated tissue (42% [25-57%] vs 52% [39-67%]; p < 0.0001) decreased. However, Lung Ultrasound score variations were not associated with lung recruitment (R = 0.01; p = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS: Lung Ultrasound score is a valid tool to assess regional and global lung aeration. Global Lung Ultrasound score variations should not be used for bedside assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1761-1768
Number of pages8
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume46
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Lung
Positive-Pressure Respiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients. / Chiumello, Davide; Mongodi, Silvia; Algieri, Ilaria; Vergani, Giordano Luca; Orlando, Anita; Via, Gabriele; Crimella, Francesco; Cressoni, Massimo; Mojoli, Francesco.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 1761-1768.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chiumello, Davide ; Mongodi, Silvia ; Algieri, Ilaria ; Vergani, Giordano Luca ; Orlando, Anita ; Via, Gabriele ; Crimella, Francesco ; Cressoni, Massimo ; Mojoli, Francesco. / Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients. In: Critical Care Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 46, No. 11. pp. 1761-1768.
@article{0a63d576b2614e27aa772878d9deb61d,
title = "Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Lung ultrasound is commonly used to evaluate lung morphology in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Aim of this study was to determine lung ultrasound reliability in assessing lung aeration and positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment compared with CT.DESIGN: Randomized crossover study.SETTING: University hospital ICU.PATIENTS: Twenty sedated paralyzed acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: age 56 years (43-72 yr), body mass index 25 kg/m (22-27 kg/m), and PaO2/FIO2 160 (113-218).INTERVENTIONS: Lung CT and lung ultrasound examination were performed at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 and 15 cm H2O.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Global and regional Lung Ultrasound scores were compared with CT quantitative analysis. Lung recruitment (i.e., decrease in not aerated tissue as assessed with CT) was compared with global Lung Ultrasound score variations. Global Lung Ultrasound score was strongly associated with average lung tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (R = 0.78; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (R = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Regional Lung Ultrasound score strongly correlated with tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001). Each step increase of regional Lung Ultrasound score was associated with significant increase of tissue density (p < 0.005). A substantial agreement was found between regional Lung Ultrasound score and CT classification at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (k = 0.69 [0.63-0.75]) and at positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (k = 0.70 [0.64-0.75]). At positive end-expiratory pressure 15, both global Lung Ultrasound score (22 [16-27] vs 26 [21-29]; p < 0.0001) and not aerated tissue (42{\%} [25-57{\%}] vs 52{\%} [39-67{\%}]; p < 0.0001) decreased. However, Lung Ultrasound score variations were not associated with lung recruitment (R = 0.01; p = 0.67).CONCLUSIONS: Lung Ultrasound score is a valid tool to assess regional and global lung aeration. Global Lung Ultrasound score variations should not be used for bedside assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment.",
author = "Davide Chiumello and Silvia Mongodi and Ilaria Algieri and Vergani, {Giordano Luca} and Anita Orlando and Gabriele Via and Francesco Crimella and Massimo Cressoni and Francesco Mojoli",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1761--1768",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients

AU - Chiumello, Davide

AU - Mongodi, Silvia

AU - Algieri, Ilaria

AU - Vergani, Giordano Luca

AU - Orlando, Anita

AU - Via, Gabriele

AU - Crimella, Francesco

AU - Cressoni, Massimo

AU - Mojoli, Francesco

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Lung ultrasound is commonly used to evaluate lung morphology in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Aim of this study was to determine lung ultrasound reliability in assessing lung aeration and positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment compared with CT.DESIGN: Randomized crossover study.SETTING: University hospital ICU.PATIENTS: Twenty sedated paralyzed acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: age 56 years (43-72 yr), body mass index 25 kg/m (22-27 kg/m), and PaO2/FIO2 160 (113-218).INTERVENTIONS: Lung CT and lung ultrasound examination were performed at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 and 15 cm H2O.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Global and regional Lung Ultrasound scores were compared with CT quantitative analysis. Lung recruitment (i.e., decrease in not aerated tissue as assessed with CT) was compared with global Lung Ultrasound score variations. Global Lung Ultrasound score was strongly associated with average lung tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (R = 0.78; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (R = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Regional Lung Ultrasound score strongly correlated with tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001). Each step increase of regional Lung Ultrasound score was associated with significant increase of tissue density (p < 0.005). A substantial agreement was found between regional Lung Ultrasound score and CT classification at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (k = 0.69 [0.63-0.75]) and at positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (k = 0.70 [0.64-0.75]). At positive end-expiratory pressure 15, both global Lung Ultrasound score (22 [16-27] vs 26 [21-29]; p < 0.0001) and not aerated tissue (42% [25-57%] vs 52% [39-67%]; p < 0.0001) decreased. However, Lung Ultrasound score variations were not associated with lung recruitment (R = 0.01; p = 0.67).CONCLUSIONS: Lung Ultrasound score is a valid tool to assess regional and global lung aeration. Global Lung Ultrasound score variations should not be used for bedside assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Lung ultrasound is commonly used to evaluate lung morphology in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Aim of this study was to determine lung ultrasound reliability in assessing lung aeration and positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment compared with CT.DESIGN: Randomized crossover study.SETTING: University hospital ICU.PATIENTS: Twenty sedated paralyzed acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: age 56 years (43-72 yr), body mass index 25 kg/m (22-27 kg/m), and PaO2/FIO2 160 (113-218).INTERVENTIONS: Lung CT and lung ultrasound examination were performed at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 and 15 cm H2O.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Global and regional Lung Ultrasound scores were compared with CT quantitative analysis. Lung recruitment (i.e., decrease in not aerated tissue as assessed with CT) was compared with global Lung Ultrasound score variations. Global Lung Ultrasound score was strongly associated with average lung tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (R = 0.78; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (R = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Regional Lung Ultrasound score strongly correlated with tissue density at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001) and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (rs = 0.79; p < 0.0001). Each step increase of regional Lung Ultrasound score was associated with significant increase of tissue density (p < 0.005). A substantial agreement was found between regional Lung Ultrasound score and CT classification at positive end-expiratory pressure 5 (k = 0.69 [0.63-0.75]) and at positive end-expiratory pressure 15 (k = 0.70 [0.64-0.75]). At positive end-expiratory pressure 15, both global Lung Ultrasound score (22 [16-27] vs 26 [21-29]; p < 0.0001) and not aerated tissue (42% [25-57%] vs 52% [39-67%]; p < 0.0001) decreased. However, Lung Ultrasound score variations were not associated with lung recruitment (R = 0.01; p = 0.67).CONCLUSIONS: Lung Ultrasound score is a valid tool to assess regional and global lung aeration. Global Lung Ultrasound score variations should not be used for bedside assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced recruitment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054897527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054897527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340

M3 - Article

C2 - 30048331

AN - SCOPUS:85054897527

VL - 46

SP - 1761

EP - 1768

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 11

ER -