Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease - International study (APPROACH-IS): Rationale, design, and methods

Silke Apers, Adrienne H. Kovacs, Koen Luyckx, Luis Alday, Malin Berghammer, Werner Budts, Edward Callus, Maryanne Caruana, Shanthi Chidambarathanu, Stephen C. Cook, Mikael Dellborg, Junko Enomoto, Katrine Eriksen, Susan M. Fernandes, Jamie L. Jackson, Bengt Johansson, Paul Khairy, Shelby Kutty, Samuel Menahem, Gwen RempelMaayke A. Sluman, Alexandra Soufi, Corina Thomet, Gruschen Veldtman, Jou Kou Wang, Kamila White, Philip Moons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are inconsistent and vary across the world. Better understanding of PROs and their differences across cultural and geographic barriers can best be accomplished via international studies using uniform research methods. The APPROACH-IS consortium (Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease - International Study) was created for this purpose and investigates PROs in adults with CHD worldwide. This paper outlines the project rationale, design, and methods. Methods/design APPROACH-IS is a cross-sectional study. The goal is to recruit 3500-4000 adults with CHD from 15 countries in five major regions of the world (Asia, Australia, Europe, North and South America). Self-report questionnaires are administered to capture information on PRO domains: (i) perceived health status (12-item Short-form Health Survey & EuroQOL-5D); (ii) psychological functioning (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); (iii) health behaviors (Health-Behavior Scale-Congenital Heart Disease); and (iv) quality of life (Linear Analog Scale & Satisfaction With Life Scale). Additionally, potential explanatory variables are assessed: (i) socio-demographic variables; (ii) medical history (chart review); (iii) sense of coherence (Orientation to Life Questionnaire); and (iv) illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire). Descriptive analyses and multilevel models will examine differences in PROs and investigate potential explanatory variables. Discussion APPROACH-IS represents a global effort to increase research understanding and capacity in the field of CHD, and will have major implications for patient care. Results will generate valuable information for developing interventions to optimize patients' health and well-being. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150603.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-342
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume179
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 20 2015

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Congenital
  • Heart defects
  • International cooperation
  • Methods
  • Patient-reported outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease - International study (APPROACH-IS): Rationale, design, and methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Apers, S., Kovacs, A. H., Luyckx, K., Alday, L., Berghammer, M., Budts, W., Callus, E., Caruana, M., Chidambarathanu, S., Cook, S. C., Dellborg, M., Enomoto, J., Eriksen, K., Fernandes, S. M., Jackson, J. L., Johansson, B., Khairy, P., Kutty, S., Menahem, S., ... Moons, P. (2015). Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease - International study (APPROACH-IS): Rationale, design, and methods. International Journal of Cardiology, 179, 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.084