Assessment of Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Registries

François Schiele, Chris P. Gale, Tabassome Simon, Keith A.A. Fox, Hector Bueno, Maddalena Lettino, Marco Tubaro, Etienne Puymirat, Jean Ferrières, Nicolas Meneveau, Nicolas Danchin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background - The Acute Cardiovascular Care Association defined quality indicators (QIs) for the management of acute myocardial infarction. The application of these QIs to existing databases is appealing. It remains to be determined what the rates of implementation are, how the QIs are related to long-term survival, and whether quality categorization is possible. Methods and Results - The QIs were extracted from the French nationwide registries French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 (n=3670) and FAST-MI 2010 (n=4169). Implementation rates for each QI are reported for both cohorts. The composite QI was used for benchmarking, and the relationship between QIs and 3-year survival was determined using a Cox model. In FAST-MI 2010, 12 individual and 2 composite QIs could be assessed. Four QIs were not recorded in FAST-MI 2010 and 4 in 2005, either because of treatment nonavailability or because of data not recorded. The degree of implementation ranged from 12% to 89%, with higher rates in 2010 as compared with 2005. Seven individual QIs were associated with survival, and there was a significant and gradual association between survival and categories of the composite QI. Center categorization was possible in 26% to 30% of participating centers; 16 (27%) centers in 2005 and 14 (20%) in 2010 were categorized as low quality. Conclusions - Twelve of 17 individual QIs could be assessed from FAST-MI 2010. The composite QI was significantly associated with 3-year survival and distinguished centers with high, average, and low quality of care.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Registries
Myocardial Infarction
Benchmarking
Quality of Health Care
Proportional Hazards Models
Databases
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • acute myocardial infarction
  • hospital
  • mortality
  • quality indicators
  • quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Assessment of Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Registries. / Schiele, François; Gale, Chris P.; Simon, Tabassome; Fox, Keith A.A.; Bueno, Hector; Lettino, Maddalena; Tubaro, Marco; Puymirat, Etienne; Ferrières, Jean; Meneveau, Nicolas; Danchin, Nicolas.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schiele, François ; Gale, Chris P. ; Simon, Tabassome ; Fox, Keith A.A. ; Bueno, Hector ; Lettino, Maddalena ; Tubaro, Marco ; Puymirat, Etienne ; Ferrières, Jean ; Meneveau, Nicolas ; Danchin, Nicolas. / Assessment of Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Registries. In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 6.
@article{2b91fd17c7e043ac831a37868c9cbf3d,
title = "Assessment of Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Registries",
abstract = "Background - The Acute Cardiovascular Care Association defined quality indicators (QIs) for the management of acute myocardial infarction. The application of these QIs to existing databases is appealing. It remains to be determined what the rates of implementation are, how the QIs are related to long-term survival, and whether quality categorization is possible. Methods and Results - The QIs were extracted from the French nationwide registries French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 (n=3670) and FAST-MI 2010 (n=4169). Implementation rates for each QI are reported for both cohorts. The composite QI was used for benchmarking, and the relationship between QIs and 3-year survival was determined using a Cox model. In FAST-MI 2010, 12 individual and 2 composite QIs could be assessed. Four QIs were not recorded in FAST-MI 2010 and 4 in 2005, either because of treatment nonavailability or because of data not recorded. The degree of implementation ranged from 12{\%} to 89{\%}, with higher rates in 2010 as compared with 2005. Seven individual QIs were associated with survival, and there was a significant and gradual association between survival and categories of the composite QI. Center categorization was possible in 26{\%} to 30{\%} of participating centers; 16 (27{\%}) centers in 2005 and 14 (20{\%}) in 2010 were categorized as low quality. Conclusions - Twelve of 17 individual QIs could be assessed from FAST-MI 2010. The composite QI was significantly associated with 3-year survival and distinguished centers with high, average, and low quality of care.",
keywords = "acute myocardial infarction, hospital, mortality, quality indicators, quality of care",
author = "Fran{\cc}ois Schiele and Gale, {Chris P.} and Tabassome Simon and Fox, {Keith A.A.} and Hector Bueno and Maddalena Lettino and Marco Tubaro and Etienne Puymirat and Jean Ferri{\`e}res and Nicolas Meneveau and Nicolas Danchin",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003336",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes",
issn = "1941-7713",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Registries

AU - Schiele, François

AU - Gale, Chris P.

AU - Simon, Tabassome

AU - Fox, Keith A.A.

AU - Bueno, Hector

AU - Lettino, Maddalena

AU - Tubaro, Marco

AU - Puymirat, Etienne

AU - Ferrières, Jean

AU - Meneveau, Nicolas

AU - Danchin, Nicolas

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Background - The Acute Cardiovascular Care Association defined quality indicators (QIs) for the management of acute myocardial infarction. The application of these QIs to existing databases is appealing. It remains to be determined what the rates of implementation are, how the QIs are related to long-term survival, and whether quality categorization is possible. Methods and Results - The QIs were extracted from the French nationwide registries French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 (n=3670) and FAST-MI 2010 (n=4169). Implementation rates for each QI are reported for both cohorts. The composite QI was used for benchmarking, and the relationship between QIs and 3-year survival was determined using a Cox model. In FAST-MI 2010, 12 individual and 2 composite QIs could be assessed. Four QIs were not recorded in FAST-MI 2010 and 4 in 2005, either because of treatment nonavailability or because of data not recorded. The degree of implementation ranged from 12% to 89%, with higher rates in 2010 as compared with 2005. Seven individual QIs were associated with survival, and there was a significant and gradual association between survival and categories of the composite QI. Center categorization was possible in 26% to 30% of participating centers; 16 (27%) centers in 2005 and 14 (20%) in 2010 were categorized as low quality. Conclusions - Twelve of 17 individual QIs could be assessed from FAST-MI 2010. The composite QI was significantly associated with 3-year survival and distinguished centers with high, average, and low quality of care.

AB - Background - The Acute Cardiovascular Care Association defined quality indicators (QIs) for the management of acute myocardial infarction. The application of these QIs to existing databases is appealing. It remains to be determined what the rates of implementation are, how the QIs are related to long-term survival, and whether quality categorization is possible. Methods and Results - The QIs were extracted from the French nationwide registries French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 (n=3670) and FAST-MI 2010 (n=4169). Implementation rates for each QI are reported for both cohorts. The composite QI was used for benchmarking, and the relationship between QIs and 3-year survival was determined using a Cox model. In FAST-MI 2010, 12 individual and 2 composite QIs could be assessed. Four QIs were not recorded in FAST-MI 2010 and 4 in 2005, either because of treatment nonavailability or because of data not recorded. The degree of implementation ranged from 12% to 89%, with higher rates in 2010 as compared with 2005. Seven individual QIs were associated with survival, and there was a significant and gradual association between survival and categories of the composite QI. Center categorization was possible in 26% to 30% of participating centers; 16 (27%) centers in 2005 and 14 (20%) in 2010 were categorized as low quality. Conclusions - Twelve of 17 individual QIs could be assessed from FAST-MI 2010. The composite QI was significantly associated with 3-year survival and distinguished centers with high, average, and low quality of care.

KW - acute myocardial infarction

KW - hospital

KW - mortality

KW - quality indicators

KW - quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020962655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020962655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003336

DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003336

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020962655

VL - 10

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

SN - 1941-7713

IS - 6

ER -