Abstract
Policymakers and public opinion are concerned about the role of medical malpractice liability in driving up the total cost of medical care. As a result, risk management, a fundamental component of clinical administration, is now the centre of attention of healthcare experts, administrative officers, and operators, as well as representatives of various international groups that have an interest in public health [1]. The available methods for assessing the nature and scale of harm caused by health systems have widely differing purposes, strengths, and limitations and should thus be considered as complementary, by providing different levels of qualitative and quantitative information [1].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Errors in Radiology |
| Publisher | Springer-Verlag Milan |
| Pages | 287-291 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9788847023390, 9788847023383 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1 2012 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Assessment of risk in radiology using malpractice RVUs. / Cristofaro, Massimo; Rizzi, Elisa Busi; Schininà, Vincenzo.
Errors in Radiology. Springer-Verlag Milan, 2012. p. 287-291.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Assessment of risk in radiology using malpractice RVUs
AU - Cristofaro, Massimo
AU - Rizzi, Elisa Busi
AU - Schininà, Vincenzo
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - Policymakers and public opinion are concerned about the role of medical malpractice liability in driving up the total cost of medical care. As a result, risk management, a fundamental component of clinical administration, is now the centre of attention of healthcare experts, administrative officers, and operators, as well as representatives of various international groups that have an interest in public health [1]. The available methods for assessing the nature and scale of harm caused by health systems have widely differing purposes, strengths, and limitations and should thus be considered as complementary, by providing different levels of qualitative and quantitative information [1].
AB - Policymakers and public opinion are concerned about the role of medical malpractice liability in driving up the total cost of medical care. As a result, risk management, a fundamental component of clinical administration, is now the centre of attention of healthcare experts, administrative officers, and operators, as well as representatives of various international groups that have an interest in public health [1]. The available methods for assessing the nature and scale of harm caused by health systems have widely differing purposes, strengths, and limitations and should thus be considered as complementary, by providing different levels of qualitative and quantitative information [1].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955356899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955356899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_26
DO - 10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_26
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84955356899
SN - 9788847023390
SN - 9788847023383
SP - 287
EP - 291
BT - Errors in Radiology
PB - Springer-Verlag Milan
ER -