Assessment of Stress-Related Psychophysiological Reactions in Chronic Back Pain Patients

Herta Flor, Dennis C. Turk, Niels Birbaumer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relationship of paraspinal electromyogram (EMG) reactivity to personally relevant and general stress was compared among chronic back pain patients (CBP), non-back-pain patients, and healthy controls. Subjects participated in a psychophysiological assessment that included four trials (discussions of personal stress and pain, mental arithmetic, and reciting the alphabet). Paraspinal and frontalis EMG, heart rate, and skin resistance were recorded continuously. Psychological variables (e.g., depression and perceived control) were also assessed. Results indicate that CBP patients display elevations and delayed return to baseline only in their paravertebral musculature and only when discussing personally relevant stress. Neither of the other groups displayed similar response patterns. Abnormal muscular reactivity was best predicted by depression and manner of coping with pain rather than by organic variables. These results suggest that the assessment of stress-related responses may be important in the evaluation and treatment of CBP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-364
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1985

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Pain
Depression
Heart Rate
Psychology
Skin
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Assessment of Stress-Related Psychophysiological Reactions in Chronic Back Pain Patients. / Flor, Herta; Turk, Dennis C.; Birbaumer, Niels.

In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 3, 06.1985, p. 354-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flor, Herta ; Turk, Dennis C. ; Birbaumer, Niels. / Assessment of Stress-Related Psychophysiological Reactions in Chronic Back Pain Patients. In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1985 ; Vol. 53, No. 3. pp. 354-364.
@article{c82c76abdd644b78a493c4d4a5cffb56,
title = "Assessment of Stress-Related Psychophysiological Reactions in Chronic Back Pain Patients",
abstract = "The relationship of paraspinal electromyogram (EMG) reactivity to personally relevant and general stress was compared among chronic back pain patients (CBP), non-back-pain patients, and healthy controls. Subjects participated in a psychophysiological assessment that included four trials (discussions of personal stress and pain, mental arithmetic, and reciting the alphabet). Paraspinal and frontalis EMG, heart rate, and skin resistance were recorded continuously. Psychological variables (e.g., depression and perceived control) were also assessed. Results indicate that CBP patients display elevations and delayed return to baseline only in their paravertebral musculature and only when discussing personally relevant stress. Neither of the other groups displayed similar response patterns. Abnormal muscular reactivity was best predicted by depression and manner of coping with pain rather than by organic variables. These results suggest that the assessment of stress-related responses may be important in the evaluation and treatment of CBP.",
author = "Herta Flor and Turk, {Dennis C.} and Niels Birbaumer",
year = "1985",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.354",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "354--364",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of Stress-Related Psychophysiological Reactions in Chronic Back Pain Patients

AU - Flor, Herta

AU - Turk, Dennis C.

AU - Birbaumer, Niels

PY - 1985/6

Y1 - 1985/6

N2 - The relationship of paraspinal electromyogram (EMG) reactivity to personally relevant and general stress was compared among chronic back pain patients (CBP), non-back-pain patients, and healthy controls. Subjects participated in a psychophysiological assessment that included four trials (discussions of personal stress and pain, mental arithmetic, and reciting the alphabet). Paraspinal and frontalis EMG, heart rate, and skin resistance were recorded continuously. Psychological variables (e.g., depression and perceived control) were also assessed. Results indicate that CBP patients display elevations and delayed return to baseline only in their paravertebral musculature and only when discussing personally relevant stress. Neither of the other groups displayed similar response patterns. Abnormal muscular reactivity was best predicted by depression and manner of coping with pain rather than by organic variables. These results suggest that the assessment of stress-related responses may be important in the evaluation and treatment of CBP.

AB - The relationship of paraspinal electromyogram (EMG) reactivity to personally relevant and general stress was compared among chronic back pain patients (CBP), non-back-pain patients, and healthy controls. Subjects participated in a psychophysiological assessment that included four trials (discussions of personal stress and pain, mental arithmetic, and reciting the alphabet). Paraspinal and frontalis EMG, heart rate, and skin resistance were recorded continuously. Psychological variables (e.g., depression and perceived control) were also assessed. Results indicate that CBP patients display elevations and delayed return to baseline only in their paravertebral musculature and only when discussing personally relevant stress. Neither of the other groups displayed similar response patterns. Abnormal muscular reactivity was best predicted by depression and manner of coping with pain rather than by organic variables. These results suggest that the assessment of stress-related responses may be important in the evaluation and treatment of CBP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021866647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021866647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.354

DO - 10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.354

M3 - Article

C2 - 3159767

AN - SCOPUS:0021866647

VL - 53

SP - 354

EP - 364

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 3

ER -