Assessment of visual function in MS patients: comparative study of some diagnostic tests.

V. Martinelli, G. Comi, T. Locatelli, S. Della Sala, L. Somazzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optic pathways are frequently involved in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, in some cases the involvement is asymptomatic or gives rise to only slight visual disturbances without alterations of visual acuity or of clinically evident visual field defects. In these cases several diagnostic tests permit an objective evaluation of the visual dysfunction. The aim of this study is to compare the value of contrast sensitivity test (CST), pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP), ophthalmoscopy, Goldmann perimetry in 45 MS patients with normal visual acuity. Examination of contrast sensitivity was carried out with a simple two-alternative forced choice test estimating the spatial frequency of 4 cycles/degree. The VEP was performed with a pattern reversal checkerboard at a spatial frequency of 1 and 2 cycles/degree. Fundus examination was abnormal in 12 patients; visual field defects were detected in 16 patients. 32 patients (71.1%) had abnormal CST in one or both eyes. VEP for the 30' checks was abnormal in 32 cases (71.1%) and that for the 15' checks in 36 cases (80.0%). All but 4 patients (91.2%) had one or more abnormal tests. All patients with abnormal perimetry and/or fundus examination had also CST and/or VEP altered. It is apparent that CST and VEP reveal a significant proportion of abnormalities in the visual system that have not been revealed by routine neuroophthalmological examination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-124
Number of pages4
JournalItalian Journal of Neurological Sciences
VolumeSuppl 6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1987

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Visual Evoked Potentials
Multiple Sclerosis
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields
Visual Acuity
Ophthalmoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Assessment of visual function in MS patients : comparative study of some diagnostic tests. / Martinelli, V.; Comi, G.; Locatelli, T.; Della Sala, S.; Somazzi, L.

In: Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Vol. Suppl 6, 06.1987, p. 121-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7be134fd4064f8ab14cde802aee6be2,
title = "Assessment of visual function in MS patients: comparative study of some diagnostic tests.",
abstract = "Optic pathways are frequently involved in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, in some cases the involvement is asymptomatic or gives rise to only slight visual disturbances without alterations of visual acuity or of clinically evident visual field defects. In these cases several diagnostic tests permit an objective evaluation of the visual dysfunction. The aim of this study is to compare the value of contrast sensitivity test (CST), pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP), ophthalmoscopy, Goldmann perimetry in 45 MS patients with normal visual acuity. Examination of contrast sensitivity was carried out with a simple two-alternative forced choice test estimating the spatial frequency of 4 cycles/degree. The VEP was performed with a pattern reversal checkerboard at a spatial frequency of 1 and 2 cycles/degree. Fundus examination was abnormal in 12 patients; visual field defects were detected in 16 patients. 32 patients (71.1{\%}) had abnormal CST in one or both eyes. VEP for the 30' checks was abnormal in 32 cases (71.1{\%}) and that for the 15' checks in 36 cases (80.0{\%}). All but 4 patients (91.2{\%}) had one or more abnormal tests. All patients with abnormal perimetry and/or fundus examination had also CST and/or VEP altered. It is apparent that CST and VEP reveal a significant proportion of abnormalities in the visual system that have not been revealed by routine neuroophthalmological examination.",
author = "V. Martinelli and G. Comi and T. Locatelli and {Della Sala}, S. and L. Somazzi",
year = "1987",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "Suppl 6",
pages = "121--124",
journal = "Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0392-0461",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of visual function in MS patients

T2 - comparative study of some diagnostic tests.

AU - Martinelli, V.

AU - Comi, G.

AU - Locatelli, T.

AU - Della Sala, S.

AU - Somazzi, L.

PY - 1987/6

Y1 - 1987/6

N2 - Optic pathways are frequently involved in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, in some cases the involvement is asymptomatic or gives rise to only slight visual disturbances without alterations of visual acuity or of clinically evident visual field defects. In these cases several diagnostic tests permit an objective evaluation of the visual dysfunction. The aim of this study is to compare the value of contrast sensitivity test (CST), pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP), ophthalmoscopy, Goldmann perimetry in 45 MS patients with normal visual acuity. Examination of contrast sensitivity was carried out with a simple two-alternative forced choice test estimating the spatial frequency of 4 cycles/degree. The VEP was performed with a pattern reversal checkerboard at a spatial frequency of 1 and 2 cycles/degree. Fundus examination was abnormal in 12 patients; visual field defects were detected in 16 patients. 32 patients (71.1%) had abnormal CST in one or both eyes. VEP for the 30' checks was abnormal in 32 cases (71.1%) and that for the 15' checks in 36 cases (80.0%). All but 4 patients (91.2%) had one or more abnormal tests. All patients with abnormal perimetry and/or fundus examination had also CST and/or VEP altered. It is apparent that CST and VEP reveal a significant proportion of abnormalities in the visual system that have not been revealed by routine neuroophthalmological examination.

AB - Optic pathways are frequently involved in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, in some cases the involvement is asymptomatic or gives rise to only slight visual disturbances without alterations of visual acuity or of clinically evident visual field defects. In these cases several diagnostic tests permit an objective evaluation of the visual dysfunction. The aim of this study is to compare the value of contrast sensitivity test (CST), pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP), ophthalmoscopy, Goldmann perimetry in 45 MS patients with normal visual acuity. Examination of contrast sensitivity was carried out with a simple two-alternative forced choice test estimating the spatial frequency of 4 cycles/degree. The VEP was performed with a pattern reversal checkerboard at a spatial frequency of 1 and 2 cycles/degree. Fundus examination was abnormal in 12 patients; visual field defects were detected in 16 patients. 32 patients (71.1%) had abnormal CST in one or both eyes. VEP for the 30' checks was abnormal in 32 cases (71.1%) and that for the 15' checks in 36 cases (80.0%). All but 4 patients (91.2%) had one or more abnormal tests. All patients with abnormal perimetry and/or fundus examination had also CST and/or VEP altered. It is apparent that CST and VEP reveal a significant proportion of abnormalities in the visual system that have not been revealed by routine neuroophthalmological examination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023356669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023356669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3654173

AN - SCOPUS:0023356669

VL - Suppl 6

SP - 121

EP - 124

JO - Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

JF - Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

SN - 0392-0461

ER -