TY - JOUR
T1 - Atezolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases
T2 - Exploratory analyses of the phase III OAK study
AU - Gadgeel, Shirish M.
AU - Lukas, Rimas V.
AU - Goldschmidt, Jerome
AU - Conkling, Paul
AU - Park, Keunchil
AU - Cortinovis, Diego
AU - de Marinis, Filippo
AU - Rittmeyer, Achim
AU - Patel, Jyoti D.
AU - von Pawel, Joachim
AU - O'Hear, Carol
AU - Lai, Catherine
AU - Hu, Sylvia
AU - Ballinger, Marcus
AU - Sandler, Alan
AU - Gandhi, Mayank
AU - Fehrenbacher, Lou
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab and docetaxel in patients with and without a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases in the phase III OAK trial. Materials and methods: Patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or loss of clinical atezolizumab benefit. Patients with asymptomatic, treated supratentorial metastases were eligible. Patients had brain scans before enrollment; follow-up brain scans and treatment were required when clinically indicated. Results: Approximately 14% of patients in each arm had a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases (61/425 in the atezolizumab arm and 62/425 in the docetaxel arm). Fewer treatment-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and treatment-related neurologic AEs were reported with atezolizumab than with docetaxel, regardless of history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases. In patients with a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases, median overall survival (OS) was longer with atezolizumab than with docetaxel (16.0 vs 11.9 months; hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49–1.13). Median OS was also longer with atezolizumab in patients without a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases (13.2 vs 9.3 months; hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.63–0.88). Landmark analyses showed that patients with a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases had a lower probability of developing new symptomatic brain lesions with atezolizumab vs docetaxel at 6–24 months. Patients without a history had a lower probability with atezolizumab at 18–24+ months. Conclusion: Atezolizumab had an acceptable neurologic safety profile, showed a trend toward an OS benefit, and led to a prolonged time to radiographic identification of new symptomatic brain lesions compared with docetaxel in patients who had a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02008227.
AB - Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab and docetaxel in patients with and without a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases in the phase III OAK trial. Materials and methods: Patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or loss of clinical atezolizumab benefit. Patients with asymptomatic, treated supratentorial metastases were eligible. Patients had brain scans before enrollment; follow-up brain scans and treatment were required when clinically indicated. Results: Approximately 14% of patients in each arm had a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases (61/425 in the atezolizumab arm and 62/425 in the docetaxel arm). Fewer treatment-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and treatment-related neurologic AEs were reported with atezolizumab than with docetaxel, regardless of history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases. In patients with a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases, median overall survival (OS) was longer with atezolizumab than with docetaxel (16.0 vs 11.9 months; hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49–1.13). Median OS was also longer with atezolizumab in patients without a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases (13.2 vs 9.3 months; hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.63–0.88). Landmark analyses showed that patients with a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases had a lower probability of developing new symptomatic brain lesions with atezolizumab vs docetaxel at 6–24 months. Patients without a history had a lower probability with atezolizumab at 18–24+ months. Conclusion: Atezolizumab had an acceptable neurologic safety profile, showed a trend toward an OS benefit, and led to a prolonged time to radiographic identification of new symptomatic brain lesions compared with docetaxel in patients who had a history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02008227.
KW - Atezolizumab
KW - Brain
KW - Central nervous system
KW - Metastasis
KW - Non-small cell lung cancer (5/6)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058988114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058988114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.12.017
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.12.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 30642441
AN - SCOPUS:85058988114
VL - 128
SP - 105
EP - 112
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
SN - 0169-5002
ER -