Atrial fibrillation: Cure or treat?

Giovanni B. Forleo, Claudio Tondo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Controversies exist with regard to the optimal management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is a desirable goal in AF patients because the prevention of recurrences may improve cardiac function, relieve symptoms and should reduce the likelihood of adverse events. Pharmacological therapy for AF has been disappointing with unacceptable rates of AF recurrence and other proarrhythmic sequelae. Recent studies suggested that potential benefit of sinus-rhythm maintenance with respect to mortality may have been neutralized by harmful effects of currently available antiarrhythmic therapies. Because of the inefficacy and dangers with nonablative therapies currently available for maintaining sinus rhythm, alternative treatments are certainly desirable. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation is now a legitimate option for a large number of patients. In several studies AF ablation has consistently been demonstrated to be superior to antiarrhythmic medications for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, many aspects of the therapy are still controversial and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-196
Number of pages10
JournalTherapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Maintenance
Therapeutics
Recurrence
Catheter Ablation
Prospective Studies
Pharmacology
Safety
Mortality

Keywords

  • Antiarrhythmic medications
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Catheter ablation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Atrial fibrillation : Cure or treat? / Forleo, Giovanni B.; Tondo, Claudio.

In: Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2009, p. 187-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68bc7edb844a480f9a00b088cd93dde7,
title = "Atrial fibrillation: Cure or treat?",
abstract = "Controversies exist with regard to the optimal management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is a desirable goal in AF patients because the prevention of recurrences may improve cardiac function, relieve symptoms and should reduce the likelihood of adverse events. Pharmacological therapy for AF has been disappointing with unacceptable rates of AF recurrence and other proarrhythmic sequelae. Recent studies suggested that potential benefit of sinus-rhythm maintenance with respect to mortality may have been neutralized by harmful effects of currently available antiarrhythmic therapies. Because of the inefficacy and dangers with nonablative therapies currently available for maintaining sinus rhythm, alternative treatments are certainly desirable. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation is now a legitimate option for a large number of patients. In several studies AF ablation has consistently been demonstrated to be superior to antiarrhythmic medications for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, many aspects of the therapy are still controversial and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach.",
keywords = "Antiarrhythmic medications, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation",
author = "Forleo, {Giovanni B.} and Claudio Tondo",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1753944709104495",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "187--196",
journal = "Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease",
issn = "1753-9447",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Atrial fibrillation

T2 - Cure or treat?

AU - Forleo, Giovanni B.

AU - Tondo, Claudio

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Controversies exist with regard to the optimal management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is a desirable goal in AF patients because the prevention of recurrences may improve cardiac function, relieve symptoms and should reduce the likelihood of adverse events. Pharmacological therapy for AF has been disappointing with unacceptable rates of AF recurrence and other proarrhythmic sequelae. Recent studies suggested that potential benefit of sinus-rhythm maintenance with respect to mortality may have been neutralized by harmful effects of currently available antiarrhythmic therapies. Because of the inefficacy and dangers with nonablative therapies currently available for maintaining sinus rhythm, alternative treatments are certainly desirable. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation is now a legitimate option for a large number of patients. In several studies AF ablation has consistently been demonstrated to be superior to antiarrhythmic medications for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, many aspects of the therapy are still controversial and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach.

AB - Controversies exist with regard to the optimal management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is a desirable goal in AF patients because the prevention of recurrences may improve cardiac function, relieve symptoms and should reduce the likelihood of adverse events. Pharmacological therapy for AF has been disappointing with unacceptable rates of AF recurrence and other proarrhythmic sequelae. Recent studies suggested that potential benefit of sinus-rhythm maintenance with respect to mortality may have been neutralized by harmful effects of currently available antiarrhythmic therapies. Because of the inefficacy and dangers with nonablative therapies currently available for maintaining sinus rhythm, alternative treatments are certainly desirable. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation is now a legitimate option for a large number of patients. In several studies AF ablation has consistently been demonstrated to be superior to antiarrhythmic medications for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, many aspects of the therapy are still controversial and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach.

KW - Antiarrhythmic medications

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Catheter ablation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67449151635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67449151635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1753944709104495

DO - 10.1177/1753944709104495

M3 - Article

C2 - 19443515

AN - SCOPUS:67449151635

VL - 3

SP - 187

EP - 196

JO - Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease

JF - Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease

SN - 1753-9447

IS - 3

ER -