Autism and classification systems

A study of 84 children

Matteo Chiappedi, Giorgio Rossi, Maura Rossi, Maurizio Bejor, Umberto Balottin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A number of studies have shown that current classification systems (ICD 10, DSM IV TR) have limitation when applied to autistic children and the category PDD NOS (DSM IV TR) has in particular been criticized. To check the possible usefulness of other classification systems to better describe patient's functioning, we retrospectively studied 84 patients, seen consecutively in our Child Neurology and Psychiatry Department (excluding only those presenting for another disease even if with clinical signs of a PDD). Methods: We tried to classify them according to ICD 10, DSM IV TR, CFTMEA-R, "operational classification" (Manzano and Palacio) and de Ajuriaguerra's classification. Results: We found a good correspondence between DSM IV TR and ICD 10 and the use of psychodynamic classification systems (in particular CFTMEA-R) was useful to differentiate clinical subtypes collected under the PDD NOS etiquette according to DSM IV TR. Conclusions: To rationalize research efforts and find better tailored therapies, we need to improve PDD classification systems, using contributions coming from every field of child psychiatry and neurology: it's possible that 0-3 Classification could help this.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10
JournalItalian Journal of Pediatrics
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 29 2010

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
International Classification of Diseases
Child Psychiatry
Neurology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Autism and classification systems : A study of 84 children. / Chiappedi, Matteo; Rossi, Giorgio; Rossi, Maura; Bejor, Maurizio; Balottin, Umberto.

In: Italian Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 36, No. 10, 10, 29.01.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chiappedi, Matteo ; Rossi, Giorgio ; Rossi, Maura ; Bejor, Maurizio ; Balottin, Umberto. / Autism and classification systems : A study of 84 children. In: Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 2010 ; Vol. 36, No. 10.
@article{f3e145ef84f243dfb8954c98d385b12b,
title = "Autism and classification systems: A study of 84 children",
abstract = "Background: A number of studies have shown that current classification systems (ICD 10, DSM IV TR) have limitation when applied to autistic children and the category PDD NOS (DSM IV TR) has in particular been criticized. To check the possible usefulness of other classification systems to better describe patient's functioning, we retrospectively studied 84 patients, seen consecutively in our Child Neurology and Psychiatry Department (excluding only those presenting for another disease even if with clinical signs of a PDD). Methods: We tried to classify them according to ICD 10, DSM IV TR, CFTMEA-R, {"}operational classification{"} (Manzano and Palacio) and de Ajuriaguerra's classification. Results: We found a good correspondence between DSM IV TR and ICD 10 and the use of psychodynamic classification systems (in particular CFTMEA-R) was useful to differentiate clinical subtypes collected under the PDD NOS etiquette according to DSM IV TR. Conclusions: To rationalize research efforts and find better tailored therapies, we need to improve PDD classification systems, using contributions coming from every field of child psychiatry and neurology: it's possible that 0-3 Classification could help this.",
author = "Matteo Chiappedi and Giorgio Rossi and Maura Rossi and Maurizio Bejor and Umberto Balottin",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/1824-7288-36-10",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Italian Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "1720-8424",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autism and classification systems

T2 - A study of 84 children

AU - Chiappedi, Matteo

AU - Rossi, Giorgio

AU - Rossi, Maura

AU - Bejor, Maurizio

AU - Balottin, Umberto

PY - 2010/1/29

Y1 - 2010/1/29

N2 - Background: A number of studies have shown that current classification systems (ICD 10, DSM IV TR) have limitation when applied to autistic children and the category PDD NOS (DSM IV TR) has in particular been criticized. To check the possible usefulness of other classification systems to better describe patient's functioning, we retrospectively studied 84 patients, seen consecutively in our Child Neurology and Psychiatry Department (excluding only those presenting for another disease even if with clinical signs of a PDD). Methods: We tried to classify them according to ICD 10, DSM IV TR, CFTMEA-R, "operational classification" (Manzano and Palacio) and de Ajuriaguerra's classification. Results: We found a good correspondence between DSM IV TR and ICD 10 and the use of psychodynamic classification systems (in particular CFTMEA-R) was useful to differentiate clinical subtypes collected under the PDD NOS etiquette according to DSM IV TR. Conclusions: To rationalize research efforts and find better tailored therapies, we need to improve PDD classification systems, using contributions coming from every field of child psychiatry and neurology: it's possible that 0-3 Classification could help this.

AB - Background: A number of studies have shown that current classification systems (ICD 10, DSM IV TR) have limitation when applied to autistic children and the category PDD NOS (DSM IV TR) has in particular been criticized. To check the possible usefulness of other classification systems to better describe patient's functioning, we retrospectively studied 84 patients, seen consecutively in our Child Neurology and Psychiatry Department (excluding only those presenting for another disease even if with clinical signs of a PDD). Methods: We tried to classify them according to ICD 10, DSM IV TR, CFTMEA-R, "operational classification" (Manzano and Palacio) and de Ajuriaguerra's classification. Results: We found a good correspondence between DSM IV TR and ICD 10 and the use of psychodynamic classification systems (in particular CFTMEA-R) was useful to differentiate clinical subtypes collected under the PDD NOS etiquette according to DSM IV TR. Conclusions: To rationalize research efforts and find better tailored therapies, we need to improve PDD classification systems, using contributions coming from every field of child psychiatry and neurology: it's possible that 0-3 Classification could help this.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649195324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649195324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1824-7288-36-10

DO - 10.1186/1824-7288-36-10

M3 - Article

VL - 36

JO - Italian Journal of Pediatrics

JF - Italian Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 1720-8424

IS - 10

M1 - 10

ER -