Autoimmune mechanisms in myasthenia gravis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Purpose of Review: This article reviews recent findings on factors and mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis and briefly summarizes data on therapies acting at various stages of the autoimmune process. Recent Findings: Data published over the last year promise to improve understanding of pathogenic mechanisms underlying myasthenia gravis. Animal studies have at last shown that antimuscle-specific kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies, like antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies, are myasthenogenic. A new autoantigen, the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), has been identified in variable proportions of otherwise seronegative patients. Anti-LRP4 antibodies may define a new myasthenia gravis subtype, supporting the concept that myasthenia gravis is not a single disease entity, and that different subtypes can differ in aetiology. Genetic and environmental factors are implicated in myasthenia gravis. The finding of persisting viral infection in the thymus of AChR-myasthenia gravis patients, combined with data on chronic inflammation, suggest that pathogens may favour intrathymic AChR-specific autosensitization and maintenance of autoimmunity in genetically susceptible individuals. Defective immunoregulatory mechanisms, involving pathogenic Th17 and regulatory T cells, contribute to tolerance loss and perpetuation of the autoimmune response in myasthenia gravis patients. Summary: The recent identification of mechanisms initiating and perpetuating autoimmunity in myasthenia gravis may stimulate the development of more effective therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-629
Number of pages9
JournalCurrent Opinion in Neurology
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012


  • autoantibodies
  • autoimmunity
  • myasthenia gravis
  • thymus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Autoimmune mechanisms in myasthenia gravis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this