Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography

G. Gennaro, F. Ferro, G. Contento, F. Fornasin, C. Di Maggio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance of an automatic software package was evaluated with phantom images acquired by a full-field digital mammography unit. After the validation, the software was used, together with a Leeds TORMAS test object, to model the image acquisition process. Process modelling results were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the method in detecting changes of exposure parameters from routine image quality measurements in digital mammography, which is the ultimate purpose of long-term reproducibility tests. Image quality indices measured by the software included the mean pixel value and standard deviation of circular details and surrounding background, contrast-to-noise ratio and relative contrast; detail counts were also collected. The validation procedure demonstrated that the software localizes the phantom details correctly and the difference between automatic and manual measurements was within few grey levels. Quantitative analysis showed sufficient sensitivity to relate fluctuations in exposure parameters (kVp or mAs) to variations in image quality indices. In comparison, detail counts were found less sensitive in detecting image quality changes, even when limitations due to observer subjectivity were overcome by automatic analysis. In conclusion, long-term reproducibility tests provided by the Leeds TORMAS phantom with quantitative analysis of multiple IQ indices have been demonstrated to be effective in predicting causes of deviation from standard operating conditions and can be used to monitor stability in full-field digital mammography.

Original languageEnglish
Article number012
Pages (from-to)1387-1407
Number of pages21
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 7 2007

Fingerprint

Mammography
Image quality
Software
evaluation
Software Validation
computer programs
quantitative analysis
Noise
Image acquisition
Chemical analysis
Software packages
deviation
Pixels
sensitivity
standard deviation
acquisition
pixels
causes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography. / Gennaro, G.; Ferro, F.; Contento, G.; Fornasin, F.; Di Maggio, C.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 52, No. 5, 012, 07.03.2007, p. 1387-1407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gennaro, G. ; Ferro, F. ; Contento, G. ; Fornasin, F. ; Di Maggio, C. / Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007 ; Vol. 52, No. 5. pp. 1387-1407.
@article{cdcd0edb9fec4985a0bc04a948fe6ec3,
title = "Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography",
abstract = "The performance of an automatic software package was evaluated with phantom images acquired by a full-field digital mammography unit. After the validation, the software was used, together with a Leeds TORMAS test object, to model the image acquisition process. Process modelling results were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the method in detecting changes of exposure parameters from routine image quality measurements in digital mammography, which is the ultimate purpose of long-term reproducibility tests. Image quality indices measured by the software included the mean pixel value and standard deviation of circular details and surrounding background, contrast-to-noise ratio and relative contrast; detail counts were also collected. The validation procedure demonstrated that the software localizes the phantom details correctly and the difference between automatic and manual measurements was within few grey levels. Quantitative analysis showed sufficient sensitivity to relate fluctuations in exposure parameters (kVp or mAs) to variations in image quality indices. In comparison, detail counts were found less sensitive in detecting image quality changes, even when limitations due to observer subjectivity were overcome by automatic analysis. In conclusion, long-term reproducibility tests provided by the Leeds TORMAS phantom with quantitative analysis of multiple IQ indices have been demonstrated to be effective in predicting causes of deviation from standard operating conditions and can be used to monitor stability in full-field digital mammography.",
author = "G. Gennaro and F. Ferro and G. Contento and F. Fornasin and {Di Maggio}, C.",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/012",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1387--1407",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography

AU - Gennaro, G.

AU - Ferro, F.

AU - Contento, G.

AU - Fornasin, F.

AU - Di Maggio, C.

PY - 2007/3/7

Y1 - 2007/3/7

N2 - The performance of an automatic software package was evaluated with phantom images acquired by a full-field digital mammography unit. After the validation, the software was used, together with a Leeds TORMAS test object, to model the image acquisition process. Process modelling results were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the method in detecting changes of exposure parameters from routine image quality measurements in digital mammography, which is the ultimate purpose of long-term reproducibility tests. Image quality indices measured by the software included the mean pixel value and standard deviation of circular details and surrounding background, contrast-to-noise ratio and relative contrast; detail counts were also collected. The validation procedure demonstrated that the software localizes the phantom details correctly and the difference between automatic and manual measurements was within few grey levels. Quantitative analysis showed sufficient sensitivity to relate fluctuations in exposure parameters (kVp or mAs) to variations in image quality indices. In comparison, detail counts were found less sensitive in detecting image quality changes, even when limitations due to observer subjectivity were overcome by automatic analysis. In conclusion, long-term reproducibility tests provided by the Leeds TORMAS phantom with quantitative analysis of multiple IQ indices have been demonstrated to be effective in predicting causes of deviation from standard operating conditions and can be used to monitor stability in full-field digital mammography.

AB - The performance of an automatic software package was evaluated with phantom images acquired by a full-field digital mammography unit. After the validation, the software was used, together with a Leeds TORMAS test object, to model the image acquisition process. Process modelling results were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the method in detecting changes of exposure parameters from routine image quality measurements in digital mammography, which is the ultimate purpose of long-term reproducibility tests. Image quality indices measured by the software included the mean pixel value and standard deviation of circular details and surrounding background, contrast-to-noise ratio and relative contrast; detail counts were also collected. The validation procedure demonstrated that the software localizes the phantom details correctly and the difference between automatic and manual measurements was within few grey levels. Quantitative analysis showed sufficient sensitivity to relate fluctuations in exposure parameters (kVp or mAs) to variations in image quality indices. In comparison, detail counts were found less sensitive in detecting image quality changes, even when limitations due to observer subjectivity were overcome by automatic analysis. In conclusion, long-term reproducibility tests provided by the Leeds TORMAS phantom with quantitative analysis of multiple IQ indices have been demonstrated to be effective in predicting causes of deviation from standard operating conditions and can be used to monitor stability in full-field digital mammography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247236188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247236188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/012

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/012

M3 - Article

C2 - 17301461

AN - SCOPUS:34247236188

VL - 52

SP - 1387

EP - 1407

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 5

M1 - 012

ER -