Automation of thyroid screening: A critical comparison of four systems

G. Banfi, M. Pontillo, P. Bonini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared four fully automated systems (Boehringer ES700, Tosoh AIA1200, Bayer Immunol, Mitsui Quartus) using 50 routine sera that included both euthyroid and pathological (with various degrees of hyper- or hypothyroidism) samples. The comparisons among systems by linear regression analysis yielded contradicting results, especially for fT4. Using the reference values of fT4 and TSH recommended from the manufacturers, the systems agreed completely in classification of patients in 32 cases; three systems agreed in seven cases, and two systems agreed in 10 cases; in one case, they completely disagreed. The agreement among the four systems we studied was high and would allow their introduction and use for routine thyroid screening. Comparison tests among fully automated systems for fT4 and TSH should not be determined only by linear regression statistical method, but additional functional validations must be performed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-175
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Ligand Assay
Volume18
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Automation
Linear regression
Linear Models
Screening
Thyroid Gland
Hyperthyroidism
Hypothyroidism
Regression analysis
Statistical methods
Reference Values
Regression Analysis
Serum

Keywords

  • automation
  • discrepant values
  • immunochemistry
  • thyroid testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Immunology

Cite this

Automation of thyroid screening : A critical comparison of four systems. / Banfi, G.; Pontillo, M.; Bonini, P.

In: Journal of Clinical Ligand Assay, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1995, p. 171-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed273e32860644328f2e7cbe769fc29b,
title = "Automation of thyroid screening: A critical comparison of four systems",
abstract = "We compared four fully automated systems (Boehringer ES700, Tosoh AIA1200, Bayer Immunol, Mitsui Quartus) using 50 routine sera that included both euthyroid and pathological (with various degrees of hyper- or hypothyroidism) samples. The comparisons among systems by linear regression analysis yielded contradicting results, especially for fT4. Using the reference values of fT4 and TSH recommended from the manufacturers, the systems agreed completely in classification of patients in 32 cases; three systems agreed in seven cases, and two systems agreed in 10 cases; in one case, they completely disagreed. The agreement among the four systems we studied was high and would allow their introduction and use for routine thyroid screening. Comparison tests among fully automated systems for fT4 and TSH should not be determined only by linear regression statistical method, but additional functional validations must be performed.",
keywords = "automation, discrepant values, immunochemistry, thyroid testing",
author = "G. Banfi and M. Pontillo and P. Bonini",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "171--175",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Ligand Assay",
issn = "1081-1672",
publisher = "Clinical Ligand Assay Society Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automation of thyroid screening

T2 - A critical comparison of four systems

AU - Banfi, G.

AU - Pontillo, M.

AU - Bonini, P.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - We compared four fully automated systems (Boehringer ES700, Tosoh AIA1200, Bayer Immunol, Mitsui Quartus) using 50 routine sera that included both euthyroid and pathological (with various degrees of hyper- or hypothyroidism) samples. The comparisons among systems by linear regression analysis yielded contradicting results, especially for fT4. Using the reference values of fT4 and TSH recommended from the manufacturers, the systems agreed completely in classification of patients in 32 cases; three systems agreed in seven cases, and two systems agreed in 10 cases; in one case, they completely disagreed. The agreement among the four systems we studied was high and would allow their introduction and use for routine thyroid screening. Comparison tests among fully automated systems for fT4 and TSH should not be determined only by linear regression statistical method, but additional functional validations must be performed.

AB - We compared four fully automated systems (Boehringer ES700, Tosoh AIA1200, Bayer Immunol, Mitsui Quartus) using 50 routine sera that included both euthyroid and pathological (with various degrees of hyper- or hypothyroidism) samples. The comparisons among systems by linear regression analysis yielded contradicting results, especially for fT4. Using the reference values of fT4 and TSH recommended from the manufacturers, the systems agreed completely in classification of patients in 32 cases; three systems agreed in seven cases, and two systems agreed in 10 cases; in one case, they completely disagreed. The agreement among the four systems we studied was high and would allow their introduction and use for routine thyroid screening. Comparison tests among fully automated systems for fT4 and TSH should not be determined only by linear regression statistical method, but additional functional validations must be performed.

KW - automation

KW - discrepant values

KW - immunochemistry

KW - thyroid testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028811101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028811101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028811101

VL - 18

SP - 171

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Clinical Ligand Assay

JF - Journal of Clinical Ligand Assay

SN - 1081-1672

IS - 3

ER -