Awareness of perception and sensory–motor integration

ERPs from the anterior insula

Rinaldo Livio Perri, Marika Berchicci, Valentina Bianco, Federico Quinzi, Donatella Spinelli, Francesco Di Russo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present work follows recent evidences of studies showing that visual stimuli evoke two early prefrontal event-related potentials (ERP) concomitant to the canonical occipital activities, but originating within the anterior insula (the pN1 and the pP1 components). To clarify the exogenous/endogenous nature of these components, we performed two experiments in which stimulus physical features (Experiment 1) and motor demands of the task (Experiment 2) were considered. In a simple response task (SRT), low-visibility stimuli evoked larger pN1 over the prefrontal areas (Experiment 1) with respect to high-visibility stimuli; in contrast, the occipital P1 component (concomitant to the pN1) had reduced amplitude in the low-visibility condition as expected. Furthermore, the latency of the P1, pN1 and pP1 was slower in the low-visibility condition (from 8 to 18 ms), and the motor response was slowed down as well (on average 14 ms). Pre-stimulus analysis showed that low-visibility stimuli were preceded by greater motor readiness. On the other hand, Experiment 2 showed that, compared with the SRT, the request to passively view the same stimuli was associated with smaller pP1. ERP source analysis confirmed the anterior insula source of the prefrontal ERPs; we interpreted these activities as the correlate of two top-down perceptual processing: the sensory awareness (the pN1) and the awareness of the sensory–motor integration (the pP1), associated with the subjective experience of the visual perception and the conscious experience of the sensory–motor coupling, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3577-3592
Number of pages16
JournalBrain Structure and Function
Volume223
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Visual Perception

Keywords

  • Anterior insula
  • Awareness
  • ERP
  • pN1
  • pP1
  • Visual perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Histology

Cite this

Awareness of perception and sensory–motor integration : ERPs from the anterior insula. / Perri, Rinaldo Livio; Berchicci, Marika; Bianco, Valentina; Quinzi, Federico; Spinelli, Donatella; Di Russo, Francesco.

In: Brain Structure and Function, Vol. 223, No. 8, 01.11.2018, p. 3577-3592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{289db21c996a49d8925ad14192d9ffb2,
title = "Awareness of perception and sensory–motor integration: ERPs from the anterior insula",
abstract = "The present work follows recent evidences of studies showing that visual stimuli evoke two early prefrontal event-related potentials (ERP) concomitant to the canonical occipital activities, but originating within the anterior insula (the pN1 and the pP1 components). To clarify the exogenous/endogenous nature of these components, we performed two experiments in which stimulus physical features (Experiment 1) and motor demands of the task (Experiment 2) were considered. In a simple response task (SRT), low-visibility stimuli evoked larger pN1 over the prefrontal areas (Experiment 1) with respect to high-visibility stimuli; in contrast, the occipital P1 component (concomitant to the pN1) had reduced amplitude in the low-visibility condition as expected. Furthermore, the latency of the P1, pN1 and pP1 was slower in the low-visibility condition (from 8 to 18 ms), and the motor response was slowed down as well (on average 14 ms). Pre-stimulus analysis showed that low-visibility stimuli were preceded by greater motor readiness. On the other hand, Experiment 2 showed that, compared with the SRT, the request to passively view the same stimuli was associated with smaller pP1. ERP source analysis confirmed the anterior insula source of the prefrontal ERPs; we interpreted these activities as the correlate of two top-down perceptual processing: the sensory awareness (the pN1) and the awareness of the sensory–motor integration (the pP1), associated with the subjective experience of the visual perception and the conscious experience of the sensory–motor coupling, respectively.",
keywords = "Anterior insula, Awareness, ERP, pN1, pP1, Visual perception",
author = "Perri, {Rinaldo Livio} and Marika Berchicci and Valentina Bianco and Federico Quinzi and Donatella Spinelli and {Di Russo}, Francesco",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00429-018-1709-y",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
pages = "3577--3592",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte",
issn = "0177-5154",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Awareness of perception and sensory–motor integration

T2 - ERPs from the anterior insula

AU - Perri, Rinaldo Livio

AU - Berchicci, Marika

AU - Bianco, Valentina

AU - Quinzi, Federico

AU - Spinelli, Donatella

AU - Di Russo, Francesco

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The present work follows recent evidences of studies showing that visual stimuli evoke two early prefrontal event-related potentials (ERP) concomitant to the canonical occipital activities, but originating within the anterior insula (the pN1 and the pP1 components). To clarify the exogenous/endogenous nature of these components, we performed two experiments in which stimulus physical features (Experiment 1) and motor demands of the task (Experiment 2) were considered. In a simple response task (SRT), low-visibility stimuli evoked larger pN1 over the prefrontal areas (Experiment 1) with respect to high-visibility stimuli; in contrast, the occipital P1 component (concomitant to the pN1) had reduced amplitude in the low-visibility condition as expected. Furthermore, the latency of the P1, pN1 and pP1 was slower in the low-visibility condition (from 8 to 18 ms), and the motor response was slowed down as well (on average 14 ms). Pre-stimulus analysis showed that low-visibility stimuli were preceded by greater motor readiness. On the other hand, Experiment 2 showed that, compared with the SRT, the request to passively view the same stimuli was associated with smaller pP1. ERP source analysis confirmed the anterior insula source of the prefrontal ERPs; we interpreted these activities as the correlate of two top-down perceptual processing: the sensory awareness (the pN1) and the awareness of the sensory–motor integration (the pP1), associated with the subjective experience of the visual perception and the conscious experience of the sensory–motor coupling, respectively.

AB - The present work follows recent evidences of studies showing that visual stimuli evoke two early prefrontal event-related potentials (ERP) concomitant to the canonical occipital activities, but originating within the anterior insula (the pN1 and the pP1 components). To clarify the exogenous/endogenous nature of these components, we performed two experiments in which stimulus physical features (Experiment 1) and motor demands of the task (Experiment 2) were considered. In a simple response task (SRT), low-visibility stimuli evoked larger pN1 over the prefrontal areas (Experiment 1) with respect to high-visibility stimuli; in contrast, the occipital P1 component (concomitant to the pN1) had reduced amplitude in the low-visibility condition as expected. Furthermore, the latency of the P1, pN1 and pP1 was slower in the low-visibility condition (from 8 to 18 ms), and the motor response was slowed down as well (on average 14 ms). Pre-stimulus analysis showed that low-visibility stimuli were preceded by greater motor readiness. On the other hand, Experiment 2 showed that, compared with the SRT, the request to passively view the same stimuli was associated with smaller pP1. ERP source analysis confirmed the anterior insula source of the prefrontal ERPs; we interpreted these activities as the correlate of two top-down perceptual processing: the sensory awareness (the pN1) and the awareness of the sensory–motor integration (the pP1), associated with the subjective experience of the visual perception and the conscious experience of the sensory–motor coupling, respectively.

KW - Anterior insula

KW - Awareness

KW - ERP

KW - pN1

KW - pP1

KW - Visual perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049555665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049555665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00429-018-1709-y

DO - 10.1007/s00429-018-1709-y

M3 - Article

VL - 223

SP - 3577

EP - 3592

JO - Zeitschrift fur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte

JF - Zeitschrift fur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte

SN - 0177-5154

IS - 8

ER -