Barbed vs conventional sutures in bariatric surgery: a propensity score analysis from a high-volume center

Francesco Pennestrì, Pierpaolo Gallucci, Francesca Prioli, Piero Giustacchini, Luigi Ciccoritti, Luca Sessa, Rocco Bellantone, Marco Raffaelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of barbed sutures for constructing an anastomosis is favoured by a few bariatric surgeons as compared to conventional sutures. The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of barbed sutures to close the gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) in laparoscopic gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-RYGB, and One-Anastomosis gastric bypass-OAGB) using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic gastric bypasses between January 2012 and December 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two different groups (RYGB-G and OAGB-G). PSM analysis was performed to minimize patient selection bias between the two types of sutures (barbed-BS and conventional-CS) in each group. A total of 808 patients were reviewed. After PSM, 488 (244 BS vs 244 CS) patients in RYGB-G and 48 in OAGB-G (24 BS vs 24 CS) patients were compared. Median operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) for BS in RYGB-G. In OAGB-G, BS were associated with a shorter operative time, although no significant difference was observed (p = 0.183). Post-operative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS in both the groups (p < 0.001). Post-operative 30th-day complications were comparable: no leakage or bleeding of GPJA was observed in BS groups. At median follow-up of 28.78 months, no late complications were observed. Barbed sutures appear to be effective to close GPJA during gastric bypass and as safe as conventional suture. Further studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalUpdates in Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Sep 6 2018

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Bariatric Surgery
Gastric Bypass
Sutures
Stomach
Operative Time
Bariatrics
Selection Bias
Patient Selection
Length of Stay
Hemorrhage
Safety

Cite this

Barbed vs conventional sutures in bariatric surgery : a propensity score analysis from a high-volume center. / Pennestrì, Francesco; Gallucci, Pierpaolo; Prioli, Francesca; Giustacchini, Piero; Ciccoritti, Luigi; Sessa, Luca; Bellantone, Rocco; Raffaelli, Marco.

In: Updates in Surgery, 06.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pennestrì, Francesco ; Gallucci, Pierpaolo ; Prioli, Francesca ; Giustacchini, Piero ; Ciccoritti, Luigi ; Sessa, Luca ; Bellantone, Rocco ; Raffaelli, Marco. / Barbed vs conventional sutures in bariatric surgery : a propensity score analysis from a high-volume center. In: Updates in Surgery. 2018.
@article{b41795450ded4b51b2df23f8b218fd7b,
title = "Barbed vs conventional sutures in bariatric surgery: a propensity score analysis from a high-volume center",
abstract = "The use of barbed sutures for constructing an anastomosis is favoured by a few bariatric surgeons as compared to conventional sutures. The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of barbed sutures to close the gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) in laparoscopic gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-RYGB, and One-Anastomosis gastric bypass-OAGB) using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic gastric bypasses between January 2012 and December 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two different groups (RYGB-G and OAGB-G). PSM analysis was performed to minimize patient selection bias between the two types of sutures (barbed-BS and conventional-CS) in each group. A total of 808 patients were reviewed. After PSM, 488 (244 BS vs 244 CS) patients in RYGB-G and 48 in OAGB-G (24 BS vs 24 CS) patients were compared. Median operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) for BS in RYGB-G. In OAGB-G, BS were associated with a shorter operative time, although no significant difference was observed (p = 0.183). Post-operative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS in both the groups (p < 0.001). Post-operative 30th-day complications were comparable: no leakage or bleeding of GPJA was observed in BS groups. At median follow-up of 28.78 months, no late complications were observed. Barbed sutures appear to be effective to close GPJA during gastric bypass and as safe as conventional suture. Further studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.",
author = "Francesco Pennestr{\`i} and Pierpaolo Gallucci and Francesca Prioli and Piero Giustacchini and Luigi Ciccoritti and Luca Sessa and Rocco Bellantone and Marco Raffaelli",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s13304-018-0589-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Updates in Surgery",
issn = "2038-131X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barbed vs conventional sutures in bariatric surgery

T2 - a propensity score analysis from a high-volume center

AU - Pennestrì, Francesco

AU - Gallucci, Pierpaolo

AU - Prioli, Francesca

AU - Giustacchini, Piero

AU - Ciccoritti, Luigi

AU - Sessa, Luca

AU - Bellantone, Rocco

AU - Raffaelli, Marco

PY - 2018/9/6

Y1 - 2018/9/6

N2 - The use of barbed sutures for constructing an anastomosis is favoured by a few bariatric surgeons as compared to conventional sutures. The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of barbed sutures to close the gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) in laparoscopic gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-RYGB, and One-Anastomosis gastric bypass-OAGB) using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic gastric bypasses between January 2012 and December 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two different groups (RYGB-G and OAGB-G). PSM analysis was performed to minimize patient selection bias between the two types of sutures (barbed-BS and conventional-CS) in each group. A total of 808 patients were reviewed. After PSM, 488 (244 BS vs 244 CS) patients in RYGB-G and 48 in OAGB-G (24 BS vs 24 CS) patients were compared. Median operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) for BS in RYGB-G. In OAGB-G, BS were associated with a shorter operative time, although no significant difference was observed (p = 0.183). Post-operative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS in both the groups (p < 0.001). Post-operative 30th-day complications were comparable: no leakage or bleeding of GPJA was observed in BS groups. At median follow-up of 28.78 months, no late complications were observed. Barbed sutures appear to be effective to close GPJA during gastric bypass and as safe as conventional suture. Further studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

AB - The use of barbed sutures for constructing an anastomosis is favoured by a few bariatric surgeons as compared to conventional sutures. The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of barbed sutures to close the gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) in laparoscopic gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-RYGB, and One-Anastomosis gastric bypass-OAGB) using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic gastric bypasses between January 2012 and December 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two different groups (RYGB-G and OAGB-G). PSM analysis was performed to minimize patient selection bias between the two types of sutures (barbed-BS and conventional-CS) in each group. A total of 808 patients were reviewed. After PSM, 488 (244 BS vs 244 CS) patients in RYGB-G and 48 in OAGB-G (24 BS vs 24 CS) patients were compared. Median operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) for BS in RYGB-G. In OAGB-G, BS were associated with a shorter operative time, although no significant difference was observed (p = 0.183). Post-operative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS in both the groups (p < 0.001). Post-operative 30th-day complications were comparable: no leakage or bleeding of GPJA was observed in BS groups. At median follow-up of 28.78 months, no late complications were observed. Barbed sutures appear to be effective to close GPJA during gastric bypass and as safe as conventional suture. Further studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

U2 - 10.1007/s13304-018-0589-2

DO - 10.1007/s13304-018-0589-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 30191533

JO - Updates in Surgery

JF - Updates in Surgery

SN - 2038-131X

ER -