Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis

Fabio Ferro, Alberto Lais, Luis Gonzalez-Serva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Recent reports in the literature indicate that laparoscopy tends to be seen as the most appropriate approach to the nonpalpable testis for diagnosis and therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real benefits of laparoscopy in terms of diagnostic accuracy, safety, costs and validity of the chosen treatment. Materials and Methods: We compared anatomical findings and results of the treatment of impalpable testes in 2 pediatric surgical groups, including 47 children treated laparoscopically during a 2 1/2-year period and 296 treated with open surgery (classic orchiopexy) in a 6 1/2-year period. Results: There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of abdominal testes (51 versus 50%), whereas a difference was noted in inguinal (4 versus 15%) and absent testes (45 versus 35%). Differences in treatment were more striking. In the laparoscopic group standard orchiopexy was performed in 62.5% of cases versus 83% in the open group. Conversely the rate of Fowler-Stephens repairs increased from 5.5% of open surgery cases to 37.5% of laparoscopic cases. There have been no serious complications in the laparoscopic procedures. To date 6 of the 9 patients who underwent a staged Fowler-Stephens procedure have undergone complete repair (open second stage). A review of the literature revealed a similar but lower tendency to over perform the Fowler-Stephens operation in laparoscopic cases (34%) versus open surgery (8%). Also, in previous series there was a 29% orchiectomy rate during laparoscopy compared to only 5% in classic open surgery. In Italy under current public health programs overall costs of the laparoscopic approach to the nonpalpable testis become noncompetitive when the procedure is extended from only diagnostic to interventional use due to the need for additional trocars and other special instruments. In contrast, private health insurers provide an additional 30% for laparoscopic cases over the cost of open orchiopexy. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is definitively accurate in establishing the differential diagnosis of impalpable testis. The number of Fowler-Stephens repairs in the laparoscopic group seems inordinately high, probably due to a lack of definite standards in the proper assessment of the length of the internal spermatic vessel pedicle and the potential scrotal displacement of the testis. This reason may explain the higher number of orchiectomies reported in the literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)795-798
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume156
Issue number2 SUPPL. 1
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1996

Fingerprint

Laparoscopy
Testis
Orchiopexy
Orchiectomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Insurance Carriers
Groin
Therapeutics
Surgical Instruments
Italy
Spermatozoa
Differential Diagnosis
Public Health
Pediatrics
Safety
Health

Keywords

  • Cryptorchism
  • Laparoscopy
  • Testis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Ferro, F., Lais, A., & Gonzalez-Serva, L. (1996). Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis. Journal of Urology, 156(2 SUPPL. 1), 795-798.

Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis. / Ferro, Fabio; Lais, Alberto; Gonzalez-Serva, Luis.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 156, No. 2 SUPPL. 1, 08.1996, p. 795-798.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferro, F, Lais, A & Gonzalez-Serva, L 1996, 'Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis', Journal of Urology, vol. 156, no. 2 SUPPL. 1, pp. 795-798.
Ferro F, Lais A, Gonzalez-Serva L. Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis. Journal of Urology. 1996 Aug;156(2 SUPPL. 1):795-798.
Ferro, Fabio ; Lais, Alberto ; Gonzalez-Serva, Luis. / Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis. In: Journal of Urology. 1996 ; Vol. 156, No. 2 SUPPL. 1. pp. 795-798.
@article{6044145f2aff47138d78f5e41d51c462,
title = "Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis",
abstract = "Purpose: Recent reports in the literature indicate that laparoscopy tends to be seen as the most appropriate approach to the nonpalpable testis for diagnosis and therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real benefits of laparoscopy in terms of diagnostic accuracy, safety, costs and validity of the chosen treatment. Materials and Methods: We compared anatomical findings and results of the treatment of impalpable testes in 2 pediatric surgical groups, including 47 children treated laparoscopically during a 2 1/2-year period and 296 treated with open surgery (classic orchiopexy) in a 6 1/2-year period. Results: There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of abdominal testes (51 versus 50{\%}), whereas a difference was noted in inguinal (4 versus 15{\%}) and absent testes (45 versus 35{\%}). Differences in treatment were more striking. In the laparoscopic group standard orchiopexy was performed in 62.5{\%} of cases versus 83{\%} in the open group. Conversely the rate of Fowler-Stephens repairs increased from 5.5{\%} of open surgery cases to 37.5{\%} of laparoscopic cases. There have been no serious complications in the laparoscopic procedures. To date 6 of the 9 patients who underwent a staged Fowler-Stephens procedure have undergone complete repair (open second stage). A review of the literature revealed a similar but lower tendency to over perform the Fowler-Stephens operation in laparoscopic cases (34{\%}) versus open surgery (8{\%}). Also, in previous series there was a 29{\%} orchiectomy rate during laparoscopy compared to only 5{\%} in classic open surgery. In Italy under current public health programs overall costs of the laparoscopic approach to the nonpalpable testis become noncompetitive when the procedure is extended from only diagnostic to interventional use due to the need for additional trocars and other special instruments. In contrast, private health insurers provide an additional 30{\%} for laparoscopic cases over the cost of open orchiopexy. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is definitively accurate in establishing the differential diagnosis of impalpable testis. The number of Fowler-Stephens repairs in the laparoscopic group seems inordinately high, probably due to a lack of definite standards in the proper assessment of the length of the internal spermatic vessel pedicle and the potential scrotal displacement of the testis. This reason may explain the higher number of orchiectomies reported in the literature.",
keywords = "Cryptorchism, Laparoscopy, Testis",
author = "Fabio Ferro and Alberto Lais and Luis Gonzalez-Serva",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "156",
pages = "795--798",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2 SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits and afterthoughts of laparoscopy for the nonpalpable testis

AU - Ferro, Fabio

AU - Lais, Alberto

AU - Gonzalez-Serva, Luis

PY - 1996/8

Y1 - 1996/8

N2 - Purpose: Recent reports in the literature indicate that laparoscopy tends to be seen as the most appropriate approach to the nonpalpable testis for diagnosis and therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real benefits of laparoscopy in terms of diagnostic accuracy, safety, costs and validity of the chosen treatment. Materials and Methods: We compared anatomical findings and results of the treatment of impalpable testes in 2 pediatric surgical groups, including 47 children treated laparoscopically during a 2 1/2-year period and 296 treated with open surgery (classic orchiopexy) in a 6 1/2-year period. Results: There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of abdominal testes (51 versus 50%), whereas a difference was noted in inguinal (4 versus 15%) and absent testes (45 versus 35%). Differences in treatment were more striking. In the laparoscopic group standard orchiopexy was performed in 62.5% of cases versus 83% in the open group. Conversely the rate of Fowler-Stephens repairs increased from 5.5% of open surgery cases to 37.5% of laparoscopic cases. There have been no serious complications in the laparoscopic procedures. To date 6 of the 9 patients who underwent a staged Fowler-Stephens procedure have undergone complete repair (open second stage). A review of the literature revealed a similar but lower tendency to over perform the Fowler-Stephens operation in laparoscopic cases (34%) versus open surgery (8%). Also, in previous series there was a 29% orchiectomy rate during laparoscopy compared to only 5% in classic open surgery. In Italy under current public health programs overall costs of the laparoscopic approach to the nonpalpable testis become noncompetitive when the procedure is extended from only diagnostic to interventional use due to the need for additional trocars and other special instruments. In contrast, private health insurers provide an additional 30% for laparoscopic cases over the cost of open orchiopexy. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is definitively accurate in establishing the differential diagnosis of impalpable testis. The number of Fowler-Stephens repairs in the laparoscopic group seems inordinately high, probably due to a lack of definite standards in the proper assessment of the length of the internal spermatic vessel pedicle and the potential scrotal displacement of the testis. This reason may explain the higher number of orchiectomies reported in the literature.

AB - Purpose: Recent reports in the literature indicate that laparoscopy tends to be seen as the most appropriate approach to the nonpalpable testis for diagnosis and therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real benefits of laparoscopy in terms of diagnostic accuracy, safety, costs and validity of the chosen treatment. Materials and Methods: We compared anatomical findings and results of the treatment of impalpable testes in 2 pediatric surgical groups, including 47 children treated laparoscopically during a 2 1/2-year period and 296 treated with open surgery (classic orchiopexy) in a 6 1/2-year period. Results: There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of abdominal testes (51 versus 50%), whereas a difference was noted in inguinal (4 versus 15%) and absent testes (45 versus 35%). Differences in treatment were more striking. In the laparoscopic group standard orchiopexy was performed in 62.5% of cases versus 83% in the open group. Conversely the rate of Fowler-Stephens repairs increased from 5.5% of open surgery cases to 37.5% of laparoscopic cases. There have been no serious complications in the laparoscopic procedures. To date 6 of the 9 patients who underwent a staged Fowler-Stephens procedure have undergone complete repair (open second stage). A review of the literature revealed a similar but lower tendency to over perform the Fowler-Stephens operation in laparoscopic cases (34%) versus open surgery (8%). Also, in previous series there was a 29% orchiectomy rate during laparoscopy compared to only 5% in classic open surgery. In Italy under current public health programs overall costs of the laparoscopic approach to the nonpalpable testis become noncompetitive when the procedure is extended from only diagnostic to interventional use due to the need for additional trocars and other special instruments. In contrast, private health insurers provide an additional 30% for laparoscopic cases over the cost of open orchiopexy. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is definitively accurate in establishing the differential diagnosis of impalpable testis. The number of Fowler-Stephens repairs in the laparoscopic group seems inordinately high, probably due to a lack of definite standards in the proper assessment of the length of the internal spermatic vessel pedicle and the potential scrotal displacement of the testis. This reason may explain the higher number of orchiectomies reported in the literature.

KW - Cryptorchism

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Testis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842614405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842614405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 156

SP - 795

EP - 798

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2 SUPPL. 1

ER -