Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage

Lars Budäus, Hendrik Isbarn, Christian Eichelberg, Giovanni Lughezzani, Maxine Sun, Paul Perrotte, Felix K H Chun, Georg Salomon, Thomas Steuber, Jens Köllermann, Guido Sauter, Sascha A. Ahyai, Mario Zacharias, Margit Fisch, Thorsten Schlomm, Alexander Haese, Hans Heinzer, Hartwig Huland, Francesco Montorsi, Markus GraefenPierre I. Karakiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose A positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is considered an adverse prognostic feature. However, few groups have explored the potential interaction between surgical margin status and other cancer characteristics, specifically pathological stage. We addressed the first degree of interaction between positive surgical margins and other established adverse predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods We used univariate and multivariate analysis to test the effect of surgical margin status on biochemical recurrence in 4,490 patients treated at a single institution between 1992 and 2008. We systematically tested all first-degree interactions between surgical margin status, and pretreatment prostate specific antigen, pT and pN stage, and radical prostatectomy Gleason sum. If interactions were significant, we quantified the effect on the biochemical recurrence rate. Results Overall 850 patients (18.9%) had positive surgical margins. In those with negative vs positive surgical margins the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 95% vs 83%, 74% vs 62% and 47% vs 29% for pT2, pT3a and pT3b disease, respectively. In multivariate models only the pT stage-surgical margin status interaction achieved independent predictor status (p = 0.003). Negative vs positive surgical margin multivariate HRs were 1 vs 2.9, 2.3 vs 4.3 and 4.1 vs 5.6 in pT2, pT3a and pT3b cases, respectively. Conclusions Compared to negative surgical margins, positive surgical margins increase the absolute biochemical recurrence 5-year rate by 12% to 18%. More importantly, positive surgical margins may substantially worsen the prognosis beyond that of the original pathological disease stage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1341-1346
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume184
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Keywords

  • pathology
  • prostate
  • prostate-specific antigen
  • prostatectomy
  • prostatic neoplasms
  • surgical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this