Biological and synthetic conduits in peripheral nerve repair: A comparative experimental study

R. Giardino, N. N. Aldini, G. Perego, G. Cella, M. C. Maltarello, M. Fini, M. Rocca, G. Giavaresi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two different types of conduits, one biological, obtained with homologous glutaraldehyde preserved vein segments and the other synthetic bioabsorbable, made with Poly [L-lactide-co-6-caprolactone], were evaluated as guides for nerve repair in alternative to autologous grafts in an experimental animal model. Under general anesthetic, the ischiatic nerve of a number Wistar rats was transacted to create a 1 cm gap, which was then repaired by means of the conduits or autologous grafts. Controls were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months; nerve regeneration was effective with both conduits, but the count of myelinated axons showed a significant difference between the synthetic and biological tubes (p

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-230
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Artificial Organs
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Peripheral Nerves
Grafts
Repair
Transplants
Anesthetics
General Anesthetics
Nerve Regeneration
Glutaral
Axons
Wistar Rats
Rats
Veins
Animals
Animal Models
poly(lactide)
caprolactone

Keywords

  • Microsurgery
  • Nerve grafts
  • Nerve reconstruction
  • Nerve regeneration
  • Polylactic acid
  • Preserved vein

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Biological and synthetic conduits in peripheral nerve repair : A comparative experimental study. / Giardino, R.; Aldini, N. N.; Perego, G.; Cella, G.; Maltarello, M. C.; Fini, M.; Rocca, M.; Giavaresi, G.

In: International Journal of Artificial Organs, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1995, p. 225-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4aabbd5de9a407582624209de4be59b,
title = "Biological and synthetic conduits in peripheral nerve repair: A comparative experimental study",
abstract = "Two different types of conduits, one biological, obtained with homologous glutaraldehyde preserved vein segments and the other synthetic bioabsorbable, made with Poly [L-lactide-co-6-caprolactone], were evaluated as guides for nerve repair in alternative to autologous grafts in an experimental animal model. Under general anesthetic, the ischiatic nerve of a number Wistar rats was transacted to create a 1 cm gap, which was then repaired by means of the conduits or autologous grafts. Controls were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months; nerve regeneration was effective with both conduits, but the count of myelinated axons showed a significant difference between the synthetic and biological tubes (p",
keywords = "Microsurgery, Nerve grafts, Nerve reconstruction, Nerve regeneration, Polylactic acid, Preserved vein",
author = "R. Giardino and Aldini, {N. N.} and G. Perego and G. Cella and Maltarello, {M. C.} and M. Fini and M. Rocca and G. Giavaresi",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "225--230",
journal = "International Journal of Artificial Organs",
issn = "0391-3988",
publisher = "Wichtig Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological and synthetic conduits in peripheral nerve repair

T2 - A comparative experimental study

AU - Giardino, R.

AU - Aldini, N. N.

AU - Perego, G.

AU - Cella, G.

AU - Maltarello, M. C.

AU - Fini, M.

AU - Rocca, M.

AU - Giavaresi, G.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Two different types of conduits, one biological, obtained with homologous glutaraldehyde preserved vein segments and the other synthetic bioabsorbable, made with Poly [L-lactide-co-6-caprolactone], were evaluated as guides for nerve repair in alternative to autologous grafts in an experimental animal model. Under general anesthetic, the ischiatic nerve of a number Wistar rats was transacted to create a 1 cm gap, which was then repaired by means of the conduits or autologous grafts. Controls were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months; nerve regeneration was effective with both conduits, but the count of myelinated axons showed a significant difference between the synthetic and biological tubes (p

AB - Two different types of conduits, one biological, obtained with homologous glutaraldehyde preserved vein segments and the other synthetic bioabsorbable, made with Poly [L-lactide-co-6-caprolactone], were evaluated as guides for nerve repair in alternative to autologous grafts in an experimental animal model. Under general anesthetic, the ischiatic nerve of a number Wistar rats was transacted to create a 1 cm gap, which was then repaired by means of the conduits or autologous grafts. Controls were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months; nerve regeneration was effective with both conduits, but the count of myelinated axons showed a significant difference between the synthetic and biological tubes (p

KW - Microsurgery

KW - Nerve grafts

KW - Nerve reconstruction

KW - Nerve regeneration

KW - Polylactic acid

KW - Preserved vein

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029010015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029010015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8530203

AN - SCOPUS:0029010015

VL - 18

SP - 225

EP - 230

JO - International Journal of Artificial Organs

JF - International Journal of Artificial Organs

SN - 0391-3988

IS - 4

ER -