Biomechanics of the spine. Part II: Spinal instability

Roberto Izzo, Gianluigi Guarnieri, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Mario Muto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spine stability is the basic requirement to protect nervous structures and prevent the early deterioration of spinal components. All bony and soft spinal components contribute to stability, so any degenerative, traumatic or destructive lesion to any spinal structure gives rise to some degree of instability. Degenerative instability is considered a major cause of axial and radicular pain and is a frequent indication for surgery. Nevertheless the assessment of instability remains difficult in both clinical and imaging settings. All static imaging modalities, even conventional MR, the most accurate technique, are unreliable in assessing instability and chronic pain due to degenerative spine. Dynamic-positional MR is considered the most sophisticated imaging modality to evaluate abnormal spinal motion and instability. In spinal traumas, as multi-detector CT yields high-resolution reconstructions in every spatial plane, it will detect even the tiniest fractures revealing potentially unstable lesions, often avoid the routine use of MR. Nevertheless, MR remains the only modality that will directly and routinely assess soft tissue changes. Unfortunately the objectivity of MR in assessing the integrity of ligaments is not rigorously defined and its use in routine protocols to clear blunt spinal injuries remains controversial. There are no evidence-based guidelines currently available to assess the risk of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease, so predicting the risk of a pathological fracture or the timing of a collapse remains challenging even when the lesions are well-characterized by neuroimaging. Diagnostic difficulties lead to controversy in the choice of the best treatment in all forms of spinal instability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-138
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Spine
Spinal Diseases
Spinal Injuries
Spontaneous Fractures
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Ligaments
Neuroimaging
Chronic Pain
Guidelines
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • CT, MR
  • Spinal degeneration
  • Spinal instability
  • Spinal trauma
  • Spinal tumours
  • Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Biomechanics of the spine. Part II : Spinal instability. / Izzo, Roberto; Guarnieri, Gianluigi; Guglielmi, Giuseppe; Muto, Mario.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 82, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 127-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Izzo, Roberto ; Guarnieri, Gianluigi ; Guglielmi, Giuseppe ; Muto, Mario. / Biomechanics of the spine. Part II : Spinal instability. In: European Journal of Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 82, No. 1. pp. 127-138.
@article{fcdd839655f640b9b5882da8905206ca,
title = "Biomechanics of the spine. Part II: Spinal instability",
abstract = "Spine stability is the basic requirement to protect nervous structures and prevent the early deterioration of spinal components. All bony and soft spinal components contribute to stability, so any degenerative, traumatic or destructive lesion to any spinal structure gives rise to some degree of instability. Degenerative instability is considered a major cause of axial and radicular pain and is a frequent indication for surgery. Nevertheless the assessment of instability remains difficult in both clinical and imaging settings. All static imaging modalities, even conventional MR, the most accurate technique, are unreliable in assessing instability and chronic pain due to degenerative spine. Dynamic-positional MR is considered the most sophisticated imaging modality to evaluate abnormal spinal motion and instability. In spinal traumas, as multi-detector CT yields high-resolution reconstructions in every spatial plane, it will detect even the tiniest fractures revealing potentially unstable lesions, often avoid the routine use of MR. Nevertheless, MR remains the only modality that will directly and routinely assess soft tissue changes. Unfortunately the objectivity of MR in assessing the integrity of ligaments is not rigorously defined and its use in routine protocols to clear blunt spinal injuries remains controversial. There are no evidence-based guidelines currently available to assess the risk of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease, so predicting the risk of a pathological fracture or the timing of a collapse remains challenging even when the lesions are well-characterized by neuroimaging. Diagnostic difficulties lead to controversy in the choice of the best treatment in all forms of spinal instability.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, CT, MR, Spinal degeneration, Spinal instability, Spinal trauma, Spinal tumours, Spine",
author = "Roberto Izzo and Gianluigi Guarnieri and Giuseppe Guglielmi and Mario Muto",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.023",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "127--138",
journal = "European Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanics of the spine. Part II

T2 - Spinal instability

AU - Izzo, Roberto

AU - Guarnieri, Gianluigi

AU - Guglielmi, Giuseppe

AU - Muto, Mario

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Spine stability is the basic requirement to protect nervous structures and prevent the early deterioration of spinal components. All bony and soft spinal components contribute to stability, so any degenerative, traumatic or destructive lesion to any spinal structure gives rise to some degree of instability. Degenerative instability is considered a major cause of axial and radicular pain and is a frequent indication for surgery. Nevertheless the assessment of instability remains difficult in both clinical and imaging settings. All static imaging modalities, even conventional MR, the most accurate technique, are unreliable in assessing instability and chronic pain due to degenerative spine. Dynamic-positional MR is considered the most sophisticated imaging modality to evaluate abnormal spinal motion and instability. In spinal traumas, as multi-detector CT yields high-resolution reconstructions in every spatial plane, it will detect even the tiniest fractures revealing potentially unstable lesions, often avoid the routine use of MR. Nevertheless, MR remains the only modality that will directly and routinely assess soft tissue changes. Unfortunately the objectivity of MR in assessing the integrity of ligaments is not rigorously defined and its use in routine protocols to clear blunt spinal injuries remains controversial. There are no evidence-based guidelines currently available to assess the risk of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease, so predicting the risk of a pathological fracture or the timing of a collapse remains challenging even when the lesions are well-characterized by neuroimaging. Diagnostic difficulties lead to controversy in the choice of the best treatment in all forms of spinal instability.

AB - Spine stability is the basic requirement to protect nervous structures and prevent the early deterioration of spinal components. All bony and soft spinal components contribute to stability, so any degenerative, traumatic or destructive lesion to any spinal structure gives rise to some degree of instability. Degenerative instability is considered a major cause of axial and radicular pain and is a frequent indication for surgery. Nevertheless the assessment of instability remains difficult in both clinical and imaging settings. All static imaging modalities, even conventional MR, the most accurate technique, are unreliable in assessing instability and chronic pain due to degenerative spine. Dynamic-positional MR is considered the most sophisticated imaging modality to evaluate abnormal spinal motion and instability. In spinal traumas, as multi-detector CT yields high-resolution reconstructions in every spatial plane, it will detect even the tiniest fractures revealing potentially unstable lesions, often avoid the routine use of MR. Nevertheless, MR remains the only modality that will directly and routinely assess soft tissue changes. Unfortunately the objectivity of MR in assessing the integrity of ligaments is not rigorously defined and its use in routine protocols to clear blunt spinal injuries remains controversial. There are no evidence-based guidelines currently available to assess the risk of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease, so predicting the risk of a pathological fracture or the timing of a collapse remains challenging even when the lesions are well-characterized by neuroimaging. Diagnostic difficulties lead to controversy in the choice of the best treatment in all forms of spinal instability.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - CT, MR

KW - Spinal degeneration

KW - Spinal instability

KW - Spinal trauma

KW - Spinal tumours

KW - Spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871714751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871714751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.023

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 23088878

AN - SCOPUS:84871714751

VL - 82

SP - 127

EP - 138

JO - European Journal of Radiology

JF - European Journal of Radiology

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 1

ER -