Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum

Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Felix K H Chun, Andrea Gallina, Nazareno Suardi, Alberto Briganti, Andreas Erbersdobler, Thorsten Schlomm, Jochen Walz, Eike Currlin, Uwe Michl, Alexander Haese, Philippe Arjane, Hans Heinzer, Markus Graefen, Hartwig Huland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Biopsy grading at tertiary care centers may or may not be superior to biopsies performed at referral institutions. Methods: Referral biopsy and tertiary care center biopsy Gleason sums were studied in 758 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at a tertiary care center between 1992 and 2004. Grade agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa (ê). Logistic regression models predicting high-grade prostate cancer at RP were fitted using either referral or tertiary care center biopsies. Comparison of bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy estimates were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Grade agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason sum was higher (P = 0.003) for tertiary care center biopsies ν referral biopsies (55.5% ν 47.9%; P = 0.003). Upgrading occurred in 39.8% of referral biopsies ν 32.6% of tertiary care center biopsies (P = 0.03). Tertiary care center biopsies were more accurate in determining RP Gleason sum than referral biopsies (71.5% ν 65.6%, P = 0.04). Conclusion: More accurate prediction of RP Gleason grade may be achieved if biopsy is performed and graded at tertiary care centers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-538
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this