Blepharospasm 40 years later

Giovanni Defazio, Mark Hallett, Hyder A. Jinnah, Antonella Conte, Alfredo Berardelli

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forty years ago, C.D. Marsden proposed that blepharospasm should be considered a form of adult-onset focal dystonia. In the present paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the findings regarding blepharospasm reported in the past 40 years. Although prolonged spasms of the orbicularis oculi muscles remain the clinical hallmark of blepharospasm, patients with blepharospasm may be characterized by various types of involuntary activation of periocular muscles. In addition to motor features, blepharospasm patients may also have nonmotor manifestations, including psychiatric, mild cognitive, and sensory disturbances. The various motor and nonmotor symptoms are not present in all patients, suggesting that blepharospasm is phenomenologically a heterogeneous condition. This emphasizes the need for tools for severity assessment that take into account both motor and nonmotor manifestations. The cause of blepharospasm remains elusive, but several lines of evidence indicate that blepharospasm is a multifactorial condition in which one, or several, as yet unknown genes together with epigenetic and environmental factors combine to reach the threshold of the disease. Although blepharospasm was originally believed to be solely a basal ganglia disorder, neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence point to anatomical and functional involvement of several brain regions. The contribution of multiple areas has led to the hypothesis that blepharospasm should be considered as a network disorder, and this might reflect the varying occurrence of motor and nonmotor manifestations in blepharospasm patients. Despite advances in the aetiology and pathophysiology, treatment remains symptomatic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-509
Number of pages12
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Blepharospasm
Dystonic Disorders
Basal Ganglia Diseases
Muscles
Spasm
Epigenomics
Neuroimaging
Psychiatry

Keywords

  • blepharospasm
  • clinical features
  • dystonia
  • pathophysiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Blepharospasm 40 years later. / Defazio, Giovanni; Hallett, Mark; Jinnah, Hyder A.; Conte, Antonella; Berardelli, Alfredo.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 498-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Defazio, G, Hallett, M, Jinnah, HA, Conte, A & Berardelli, A 2017, 'Blepharospasm 40 years later', Movement Disorders, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26934
Defazio, Giovanni ; Hallett, Mark ; Jinnah, Hyder A. ; Conte, Antonella ; Berardelli, Alfredo. / Blepharospasm 40 years later. In: Movement Disorders. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 498-509.
@article{a844a277ca7c46dcb07436d3f8c00c5b,
title = "Blepharospasm 40 years later",
abstract = "Forty years ago, C.D. Marsden proposed that blepharospasm should be considered a form of adult-onset focal dystonia. In the present paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the findings regarding blepharospasm reported in the past 40 years. Although prolonged spasms of the orbicularis oculi muscles remain the clinical hallmark of blepharospasm, patients with blepharospasm may be characterized by various types of involuntary activation of periocular muscles. In addition to motor features, blepharospasm patients may also have nonmotor manifestations, including psychiatric, mild cognitive, and sensory disturbances. The various motor and nonmotor symptoms are not present in all patients, suggesting that blepharospasm is phenomenologically a heterogeneous condition. This emphasizes the need for tools for severity assessment that take into account both motor and nonmotor manifestations. The cause of blepharospasm remains elusive, but several lines of evidence indicate that blepharospasm is a multifactorial condition in which one, or several, as yet unknown genes together with epigenetic and environmental factors combine to reach the threshold of the disease. Although blepharospasm was originally believed to be solely a basal ganglia disorder, neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence point to anatomical and functional involvement of several brain regions. The contribution of multiple areas has led to the hypothesis that blepharospasm should be considered as a network disorder, and this might reflect the varying occurrence of motor and nonmotor manifestations in blepharospasm patients. Despite advances in the aetiology and pathophysiology, treatment remains symptomatic.",
keywords = "blepharospasm, clinical features, dystonia, pathophysiology",
author = "Giovanni Defazio and Mark Hallett and Jinnah, {Hyder A.} and Antonella Conte and Alfredo Berardelli",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mds.26934",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "498--509",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blepharospasm 40 years later

AU - Defazio, Giovanni

AU - Hallett, Mark

AU - Jinnah, Hyder A.

AU - Conte, Antonella

AU - Berardelli, Alfredo

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Forty years ago, C.D. Marsden proposed that blepharospasm should be considered a form of adult-onset focal dystonia. In the present paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the findings regarding blepharospasm reported in the past 40 years. Although prolonged spasms of the orbicularis oculi muscles remain the clinical hallmark of blepharospasm, patients with blepharospasm may be characterized by various types of involuntary activation of periocular muscles. In addition to motor features, blepharospasm patients may also have nonmotor manifestations, including psychiatric, mild cognitive, and sensory disturbances. The various motor and nonmotor symptoms are not present in all patients, suggesting that blepharospasm is phenomenologically a heterogeneous condition. This emphasizes the need for tools for severity assessment that take into account both motor and nonmotor manifestations. The cause of blepharospasm remains elusive, but several lines of evidence indicate that blepharospasm is a multifactorial condition in which one, or several, as yet unknown genes together with epigenetic and environmental factors combine to reach the threshold of the disease. Although blepharospasm was originally believed to be solely a basal ganglia disorder, neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence point to anatomical and functional involvement of several brain regions. The contribution of multiple areas has led to the hypothesis that blepharospasm should be considered as a network disorder, and this might reflect the varying occurrence of motor and nonmotor manifestations in blepharospasm patients. Despite advances in the aetiology and pathophysiology, treatment remains symptomatic.

AB - Forty years ago, C.D. Marsden proposed that blepharospasm should be considered a form of adult-onset focal dystonia. In the present paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the findings regarding blepharospasm reported in the past 40 years. Although prolonged spasms of the orbicularis oculi muscles remain the clinical hallmark of blepharospasm, patients with blepharospasm may be characterized by various types of involuntary activation of periocular muscles. In addition to motor features, blepharospasm patients may also have nonmotor manifestations, including psychiatric, mild cognitive, and sensory disturbances. The various motor and nonmotor symptoms are not present in all patients, suggesting that blepharospasm is phenomenologically a heterogeneous condition. This emphasizes the need for tools for severity assessment that take into account both motor and nonmotor manifestations. The cause of blepharospasm remains elusive, but several lines of evidence indicate that blepharospasm is a multifactorial condition in which one, or several, as yet unknown genes together with epigenetic and environmental factors combine to reach the threshold of the disease. Although blepharospasm was originally believed to be solely a basal ganglia disorder, neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence point to anatomical and functional involvement of several brain regions. The contribution of multiple areas has led to the hypothesis that blepharospasm should be considered as a network disorder, and this might reflect the varying occurrence of motor and nonmotor manifestations in blepharospasm patients. Despite advances in the aetiology and pathophysiology, treatment remains symptomatic.

KW - blepharospasm

KW - clinical features

KW - dystonia

KW - pathophysiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012942164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012942164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mds.26934

DO - 10.1002/mds.26934

M3 - Review article

VL - 32

SP - 498

EP - 509

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 4

ER -