Bone and joint infections in adults: A comprehensive classification proposal

Carlo Luca Romanò, Delia Romanò, Nicola Logoluso, Lorenzo Drago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and methods: Ten currently available classifications were tested for their ability to describe a continuous cohort of 300 adult patients affected by bone and joint infections. Each classification only focused, on the average, on 1.3 ± 0.4 features of a single clinical condition (osteomyelitis, implant-related infections, or septic arthritis), being able to classify 34.8 ± 24.7% of the patients, while a comprehensive classification system could describe all the patients considered in the study. Result and conclusion: A comprehensive classification system permits more accurate classification of bone and joint infections in adults than any single classification available and may serve for didactic, scientific, and clinical purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-217
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume1
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Joints
Bone and Bones
Infection
Infectious Arthritis
Osteomyelitis

Keywords

  • Bone and joint infections (BJIs)
  • Implant-related infection
  • Joint infection
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Septic arthritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Bone and joint infections in adults : A comprehensive classification proposal. / Romanò, Carlo Luca; Romanò, Delia; Logoluso, Nicola; Drago, Lorenzo.

In: European Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 1, No. 6, 2010, p. 207-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Romanò, Carlo Luca ; Romanò, Delia ; Logoluso, Nicola ; Drago, Lorenzo. / Bone and joint infections in adults : A comprehensive classification proposal. In: European Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2010 ; Vol. 1, No. 6. pp. 207-217.
@article{34d464c8108e4fd9b390fb7f135098e7,
title = "Bone and joint infections in adults: A comprehensive classification proposal",
abstract = "Introduction and methods: Ten currently available classifications were tested for their ability to describe a continuous cohort of 300 adult patients affected by bone and joint infections. Each classification only focused, on the average, on 1.3 ± 0.4 features of a single clinical condition (osteomyelitis, implant-related infections, or septic arthritis), being able to classify 34.8 ± 24.7{\%} of the patients, while a comprehensive classification system could describe all the patients considered in the study. Result and conclusion: A comprehensive classification system permits more accurate classification of bone and joint infections in adults than any single classification available and may serve for didactic, scientific, and clinical purposes.",
keywords = "Bone and joint infections (BJIs), Implant-related infection, Joint infection, Osteomyelitis, Septic arthritis",
author = "Roman{\`o}, {Carlo Luca} and Delia Roman{\`o} and Nicola Logoluso and Lorenzo Drago",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s12570-011-0056-8",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "207--217",
journal = "European Orthopaedics and Traumatology",
issn = "1867-4569",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone and joint infections in adults

T2 - A comprehensive classification proposal

AU - Romanò, Carlo Luca

AU - Romanò, Delia

AU - Logoluso, Nicola

AU - Drago, Lorenzo

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Introduction and methods: Ten currently available classifications were tested for their ability to describe a continuous cohort of 300 adult patients affected by bone and joint infections. Each classification only focused, on the average, on 1.3 ± 0.4 features of a single clinical condition (osteomyelitis, implant-related infections, or septic arthritis), being able to classify 34.8 ± 24.7% of the patients, while a comprehensive classification system could describe all the patients considered in the study. Result and conclusion: A comprehensive classification system permits more accurate classification of bone and joint infections in adults than any single classification available and may serve for didactic, scientific, and clinical purposes.

AB - Introduction and methods: Ten currently available classifications were tested for their ability to describe a continuous cohort of 300 adult patients affected by bone and joint infections. Each classification only focused, on the average, on 1.3 ± 0.4 features of a single clinical condition (osteomyelitis, implant-related infections, or septic arthritis), being able to classify 34.8 ± 24.7% of the patients, while a comprehensive classification system could describe all the patients considered in the study. Result and conclusion: A comprehensive classification system permits more accurate classification of bone and joint infections in adults than any single classification available and may serve for didactic, scientific, and clinical purposes.

KW - Bone and joint infections (BJIs)

KW - Implant-related infection

KW - Joint infection

KW - Osteomyelitis

KW - Septic arthritis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82355169862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82355169862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12570-011-0056-8

DO - 10.1007/s12570-011-0056-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:82355169862

VL - 1

SP - 207

EP - 217

JO - European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

JF - European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

SN - 1867-4569

IS - 6

ER -