Bone Level Changes Around Axial and Tilted Implants in Full-Arch Fixed Immediate Restorations. Interim Results of a Prospective Study

Luca Francetti, Davide Romeo, Stefano Corbella, Silvio Taschieri, Massimo Del Fabbro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess clinical outcomes and peri-implant bone level changes around tilted and axial implants supporting full-arch fixed immediate rehabilitations up to 60months of loading. Material and Methods: Forty-seven patients (22 women and 25 men) were included in the study. Each patient received a full-arch fixed bridge supported by two axial and two distal tilted implants. Loading was applied within 48hours of surgery. Patients were scheduled for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, 24months, and annually up to 5years. At each follow-up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change was performed. Periapical radiographs were taken using a paralleling technique, and subsequently scanned at 600dpi. An image analysis software was used to assess bone level. Results: A total of 33 mandibles and 16 maxillae were rehabilitated (two patients received a fixed prosthesis in both arches). One hundred ninety-six Nobel Biocare implants of 4mm diameter were placed. The mean follow-up duration was 52.8months (range 30-66months) in the mandible, and 33.8months (range 22-40 months) in the maxilla. All subjects attended the scheduled follow-up visits. No implant was lost. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between axial and tilted implants in both jaws, at each follow-up. No significant difference in bone loss was found between mandible and maxilla, for both axial and tilted implants at each comparable time frame, although slightly higher mean values were always found for the mandible. Conclusion: The use of tilted implants in the immediate rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws is safe and is not associated to a higher marginal bone loss as compared to axially placed implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)646-654
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Prospective Studies
Mandible
Bone and Bones
Maxilla
Edentulous Jaw
Rehabilitation
Fixed Partial Denture
Jaw
Prostheses and Implants
Software
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Bone loss
  • Dental implants
  • Immediate loading
  • Mandible
  • Maxilla
  • Tilted implants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Bone Level Changes Around Axial and Tilted Implants in Full-Arch Fixed Immediate Restorations. Interim Results of a Prospective Study. / Francetti, Luca; Romeo, Davide; Corbella, Stefano; Taschieri, Silvio; Del Fabbro, Massimo.

In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 646-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f72200333334498e83a786e898a5e782,
title = "Bone Level Changes Around Axial and Tilted Implants in Full-Arch Fixed Immediate Restorations. Interim Results of a Prospective Study",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess clinical outcomes and peri-implant bone level changes around tilted and axial implants supporting full-arch fixed immediate rehabilitations up to 60months of loading. Material and Methods: Forty-seven patients (22 women and 25 men) were included in the study. Each patient received a full-arch fixed bridge supported by two axial and two distal tilted implants. Loading was applied within 48hours of surgery. Patients were scheduled for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, 24months, and annually up to 5years. At each follow-up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change was performed. Periapical radiographs were taken using a paralleling technique, and subsequently scanned at 600dpi. An image analysis software was used to assess bone level. Results: A total of 33 mandibles and 16 maxillae were rehabilitated (two patients received a fixed prosthesis in both arches). One hundred ninety-six Nobel Biocare implants of 4mm diameter were placed. The mean follow-up duration was 52.8months (range 30-66months) in the mandible, and 33.8months (range 22-40 months) in the maxilla. All subjects attended the scheduled follow-up visits. No implant was lost. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between axial and tilted implants in both jaws, at each follow-up. No significant difference in bone loss was found between mandible and maxilla, for both axial and tilted implants at each comparable time frame, although slightly higher mean values were always found for the mandible. Conclusion: The use of tilted implants in the immediate rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws is safe and is not associated to a higher marginal bone loss as compared to axially placed implants.",
keywords = "Bone loss, Dental implants, Immediate loading, Mandible, Maxilla, Tilted implants",
author = "Luca Francetti and Davide Romeo and Stefano Corbella and Silvio Taschieri and {Del Fabbro}, Massimo",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00304.x",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "646--654",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone Level Changes Around Axial and Tilted Implants in Full-Arch Fixed Immediate Restorations. Interim Results of a Prospective Study

AU - Francetti, Luca

AU - Romeo, Davide

AU - Corbella, Stefano

AU - Taschieri, Silvio

AU - Del Fabbro, Massimo

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess clinical outcomes and peri-implant bone level changes around tilted and axial implants supporting full-arch fixed immediate rehabilitations up to 60months of loading. Material and Methods: Forty-seven patients (22 women and 25 men) were included in the study. Each patient received a full-arch fixed bridge supported by two axial and two distal tilted implants. Loading was applied within 48hours of surgery. Patients were scheduled for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, 24months, and annually up to 5years. At each follow-up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change was performed. Periapical radiographs were taken using a paralleling technique, and subsequently scanned at 600dpi. An image analysis software was used to assess bone level. Results: A total of 33 mandibles and 16 maxillae were rehabilitated (two patients received a fixed prosthesis in both arches). One hundred ninety-six Nobel Biocare implants of 4mm diameter were placed. The mean follow-up duration was 52.8months (range 30-66months) in the mandible, and 33.8months (range 22-40 months) in the maxilla. All subjects attended the scheduled follow-up visits. No implant was lost. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between axial and tilted implants in both jaws, at each follow-up. No significant difference in bone loss was found between mandible and maxilla, for both axial and tilted implants at each comparable time frame, although slightly higher mean values were always found for the mandible. Conclusion: The use of tilted implants in the immediate rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws is safe and is not associated to a higher marginal bone loss as compared to axially placed implants.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess clinical outcomes and peri-implant bone level changes around tilted and axial implants supporting full-arch fixed immediate rehabilitations up to 60months of loading. Material and Methods: Forty-seven patients (22 women and 25 men) were included in the study. Each patient received a full-arch fixed bridge supported by two axial and two distal tilted implants. Loading was applied within 48hours of surgery. Patients were scheduled for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, 24months, and annually up to 5years. At each follow-up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change was performed. Periapical radiographs were taken using a paralleling technique, and subsequently scanned at 600dpi. An image analysis software was used to assess bone level. Results: A total of 33 mandibles and 16 maxillae were rehabilitated (two patients received a fixed prosthesis in both arches). One hundred ninety-six Nobel Biocare implants of 4mm diameter were placed. The mean follow-up duration was 52.8months (range 30-66months) in the mandible, and 33.8months (range 22-40 months) in the maxilla. All subjects attended the scheduled follow-up visits. No implant was lost. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between axial and tilted implants in both jaws, at each follow-up. No significant difference in bone loss was found between mandible and maxilla, for both axial and tilted implants at each comparable time frame, although slightly higher mean values were always found for the mandible. Conclusion: The use of tilted implants in the immediate rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws is safe and is not associated to a higher marginal bone loss as compared to axially placed implants.

KW - Bone loss

KW - Dental implants

KW - Immediate loading

KW - Mandible

KW - Maxilla

KW - Tilted implants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867073541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867073541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00304.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00304.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20977607

AN - SCOPUS:84867073541

VL - 14

SP - 646

EP - 654

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 5

ER -