Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome

Uberto Pozzoli, Giorgia Menozzi, Matteo Fumagalli, Matteo Cereda, Giacomo P. Comi, Rachele Cagliani, Nereo Bresolin, Manuela Sironi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. Results. Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms (RIPs), as well as fixed substitutions accumulated in the human lineage since its divergence from chimpanzee to indicate that biased gene conversion (BGC) has been playing a role in within-genome GC content variation. Yet, a distinct contribution to GC content evolution is accounted for by a selective process. Accordingly, we searched for independent evidences that GC content distribution does not conform to neutral expectations. Indeed, after correcting for possible biases, we show that intron GC content and size display isochore-specific correlations. Conclusion. We consider that the more parsimonious explanation for our results is that GC content is subjected to the action of both weak selection and BGC in the human genome with features such as nucleosome positioning or chromatin conformation possibly representing the final target of selective processes. This view might reconcile previous contrasting findings and add some theoretical background to recent evidences suggesting that GC content domains display different behaviors with respect to highly regulated biological processes such as developmentally-stage related gene expression and programmed replication timing during neural stem cell differentiation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number99
JournalBMC Evolutionary Biology
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Base Composition
Human Genome
gene conversion
genome
display behavior
Isochores
nucleosomes
gene
retrotransposons
Pan troglodytes
biological processes
Gene Conversion
cell differentiation
positioning
gene expression
gene frequency
chromatin
stem cells
introns
allele

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome. / Pozzoli, Uberto; Menozzi, Giorgia; Fumagalli, Matteo; Cereda, Matteo; Comi, Giacomo P.; Cagliani, Rachele; Bresolin, Nereo; Sironi, Manuela.

In: BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 99, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b8a58c2ac664440b24b1283fa881c70,
title = "Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome",
abstract = "Background. Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. Results. Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms (RIPs), as well as fixed substitutions accumulated in the human lineage since its divergence from chimpanzee to indicate that biased gene conversion (BGC) has been playing a role in within-genome GC content variation. Yet, a distinct contribution to GC content evolution is accounted for by a selective process. Accordingly, we searched for independent evidences that GC content distribution does not conform to neutral expectations. Indeed, after correcting for possible biases, we show that intron GC content and size display isochore-specific correlations. Conclusion. We consider that the more parsimonious explanation for our results is that GC content is subjected to the action of both weak selection and BGC in the human genome with features such as nucleosome positioning or chromatin conformation possibly representing the final target of selective processes. This view might reconcile previous contrasting findings and add some theoretical background to recent evidences suggesting that GC content domains display different behaviors with respect to highly regulated biological processes such as developmentally-stage related gene expression and programmed replication timing during neural stem cell differentiation.",
author = "Uberto Pozzoli and Giorgia Menozzi and Matteo Fumagalli and Matteo Cereda and Comi, {Giacomo P.} and Rachele Cagliani and Nereo Bresolin and Manuela Sironi",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2148-8-99",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMC Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1471-2148",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome

AU - Pozzoli, Uberto

AU - Menozzi, Giorgia

AU - Fumagalli, Matteo

AU - Cereda, Matteo

AU - Comi, Giacomo P.

AU - Cagliani, Rachele

AU - Bresolin, Nereo

AU - Sironi, Manuela

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Background. Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. Results. Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms (RIPs), as well as fixed substitutions accumulated in the human lineage since its divergence from chimpanzee to indicate that biased gene conversion (BGC) has been playing a role in within-genome GC content variation. Yet, a distinct contribution to GC content evolution is accounted for by a selective process. Accordingly, we searched for independent evidences that GC content distribution does not conform to neutral expectations. Indeed, after correcting for possible biases, we show that intron GC content and size display isochore-specific correlations. Conclusion. We consider that the more parsimonious explanation for our results is that GC content is subjected to the action of both weak selection and BGC in the human genome with features such as nucleosome positioning or chromatin conformation possibly representing the final target of selective processes. This view might reconcile previous contrasting findings and add some theoretical background to recent evidences suggesting that GC content domains display different behaviors with respect to highly regulated biological processes such as developmentally-stage related gene expression and programmed replication timing during neural stem cell differentiation.

AB - Background. Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. Results. Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms (RIPs), as well as fixed substitutions accumulated in the human lineage since its divergence from chimpanzee to indicate that biased gene conversion (BGC) has been playing a role in within-genome GC content variation. Yet, a distinct contribution to GC content evolution is accounted for by a selective process. Accordingly, we searched for independent evidences that GC content distribution does not conform to neutral expectations. Indeed, after correcting for possible biases, we show that intron GC content and size display isochore-specific correlations. Conclusion. We consider that the more parsimonious explanation for our results is that GC content is subjected to the action of both weak selection and BGC in the human genome with features such as nucleosome positioning or chromatin conformation possibly representing the final target of selective processes. This view might reconcile previous contrasting findings and add some theoretical background to recent evidences suggesting that GC content domains display different behaviors with respect to highly regulated biological processes such as developmentally-stage related gene expression and programmed replication timing during neural stem cell differentiation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42049113389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42049113389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2148-8-99

DO - 10.1186/1471-2148-8-99

M3 - Article

C2 - 18371205

AN - SCOPUS:42049113389

VL - 8

JO - BMC Evolutionary Biology

JF - BMC Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1471-2148

IS - 1

M1 - 99

ER -