Building a continuous multicenter infection surveillance system in the intensive care unit

Findings from the initial data set of 9,493 patients from 71 Italian intensive care units

Paolo Malacarne, Martin Langer, Ennio Nascimben, Maria Luisa Moro, Daniela Giudici, Laura Lampati, Guido Bertolini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of infections in intensive care units (ICUs), whether present at admission or acquired during the stay. METHODS: Prospective data collection lasting 6 months in 71 Italian adult ICUs. Patients were screened for infections and risk factors at ICU admission and daily during their stay. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 9,493 consecutive patients admitted to the 71 ICUs, 11.6% had a community-acquired infection, 7.4% a hospital-acquired infection, and 11.4% an ICU-acquired infection. The risk curve of acquiring infection in the ICU was higher in patients who entered without infection than in those already infected (log-rank test, p <.0001; at 15 days, 44.0% vs. 34.6%). Hospital mortality (27.8% overall) was higher in patients admitted with infection than in those who acquired infection in the ICU (45.0% vs. 32.4%, p <.0001). Although the presence of infection per se did not influence mortality, the conditions of severe sepsis and septic shock were strong prognostic factors (odds ratio, 2.3 and 4.8, respectively). Apart from ICU-acquired peritonitis, no other site of infection reached statistical significance as an independent prognostic factor for hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific data on infections and risk factors to a well-established electronic data collection system is a reliable basis for a continuous multicenter infection surveillance program in the ICU. Given the well-established importance of infection prevention programs, our data suggest that the improvement of the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock is the key to lower infection-related mortality in the ICU. This calls for closer attention to severe infections in surveillance programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1105-1113
Number of pages9
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Infection
Septic Shock
Hospital Mortality
Datasets
Sepsis
Community-Acquired Infections
Mortality
Cross Infection
Peritonitis
Information Systems
Epidemiology
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Critically ill
  • Infection
  • Infection control
  • Intensive care units
  • Septic shock
  • Severe sepsis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Building a continuous multicenter infection surveillance system in the intensive care unit : Findings from the initial data set of 9,493 patients from 71 Italian intensive care units. / Malacarne, Paolo; Langer, Martin; Nascimben, Ennio; Moro, Maria Luisa; Giudici, Daniela; Lampati, Laura; Bertolini, Guido.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 1105-1113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47d183fabcc1419f83b7540f5891fb98,
title = "Building a continuous multicenter infection surveillance system in the intensive care unit: Findings from the initial data set of 9,493 patients from 71 Italian intensive care units",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of infections in intensive care units (ICUs), whether present at admission or acquired during the stay. METHODS: Prospective data collection lasting 6 months in 71 Italian adult ICUs. Patients were screened for infections and risk factors at ICU admission and daily during their stay. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 9,493 consecutive patients admitted to the 71 ICUs, 11.6{\%} had a community-acquired infection, 7.4{\%} a hospital-acquired infection, and 11.4{\%} an ICU-acquired infection. The risk curve of acquiring infection in the ICU was higher in patients who entered without infection than in those already infected (log-rank test, p <.0001; at 15 days, 44.0{\%} vs. 34.6{\%}). Hospital mortality (27.8{\%} overall) was higher in patients admitted with infection than in those who acquired infection in the ICU (45.0{\%} vs. 32.4{\%}, p <.0001). Although the presence of infection per se did not influence mortality, the conditions of severe sepsis and septic shock were strong prognostic factors (odds ratio, 2.3 and 4.8, respectively). Apart from ICU-acquired peritonitis, no other site of infection reached statistical significance as an independent prognostic factor for hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific data on infections and risk factors to a well-established electronic data collection system is a reliable basis for a continuous multicenter infection surveillance program in the ICU. Given the well-established importance of infection prevention programs, our data suggest that the improvement of the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock is the key to lower infection-related mortality in the ICU. This calls for closer attention to severe infections in surveillance programs.",
keywords = "Critically ill, Infection, Infection control, Intensive care units, Septic shock, Severe sepsis",
author = "Paolo Malacarne and Martin Langer and Ennio Nascimben and Moro, {Maria Luisa} and Daniela Giudici and Laura Lampati and Guido Bertolini",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169ed30",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1105--1113",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building a continuous multicenter infection surveillance system in the intensive care unit

T2 - Findings from the initial data set of 9,493 patients from 71 Italian intensive care units

AU - Malacarne, Paolo

AU - Langer, Martin

AU - Nascimben, Ennio

AU - Moro, Maria Luisa

AU - Giudici, Daniela

AU - Lampati, Laura

AU - Bertolini, Guido

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of infections in intensive care units (ICUs), whether present at admission or acquired during the stay. METHODS: Prospective data collection lasting 6 months in 71 Italian adult ICUs. Patients were screened for infections and risk factors at ICU admission and daily during their stay. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 9,493 consecutive patients admitted to the 71 ICUs, 11.6% had a community-acquired infection, 7.4% a hospital-acquired infection, and 11.4% an ICU-acquired infection. The risk curve of acquiring infection in the ICU was higher in patients who entered without infection than in those already infected (log-rank test, p <.0001; at 15 days, 44.0% vs. 34.6%). Hospital mortality (27.8% overall) was higher in patients admitted with infection than in those who acquired infection in the ICU (45.0% vs. 32.4%, p <.0001). Although the presence of infection per se did not influence mortality, the conditions of severe sepsis and septic shock were strong prognostic factors (odds ratio, 2.3 and 4.8, respectively). Apart from ICU-acquired peritonitis, no other site of infection reached statistical significance as an independent prognostic factor for hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific data on infections and risk factors to a well-established electronic data collection system is a reliable basis for a continuous multicenter infection surveillance program in the ICU. Given the well-established importance of infection prevention programs, our data suggest that the improvement of the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock is the key to lower infection-related mortality in the ICU. This calls for closer attention to severe infections in surveillance programs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of infections in intensive care units (ICUs), whether present at admission or acquired during the stay. METHODS: Prospective data collection lasting 6 months in 71 Italian adult ICUs. Patients were screened for infections and risk factors at ICU admission and daily during their stay. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 9,493 consecutive patients admitted to the 71 ICUs, 11.6% had a community-acquired infection, 7.4% a hospital-acquired infection, and 11.4% an ICU-acquired infection. The risk curve of acquiring infection in the ICU was higher in patients who entered without infection than in those already infected (log-rank test, p <.0001; at 15 days, 44.0% vs. 34.6%). Hospital mortality (27.8% overall) was higher in patients admitted with infection than in those who acquired infection in the ICU (45.0% vs. 32.4%, p <.0001). Although the presence of infection per se did not influence mortality, the conditions of severe sepsis and septic shock were strong prognostic factors (odds ratio, 2.3 and 4.8, respectively). Apart from ICU-acquired peritonitis, no other site of infection reached statistical significance as an independent prognostic factor for hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific data on infections and risk factors to a well-established electronic data collection system is a reliable basis for a continuous multicenter infection surveillance program in the ICU. Given the well-established importance of infection prevention programs, our data suggest that the improvement of the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock is the key to lower infection-related mortality in the ICU. This calls for closer attention to severe infections in surveillance programs.

KW - Critically ill

KW - Infection

KW - Infection control

KW - Intensive care units

KW - Septic shock

KW - Severe sepsis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41649088169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41649088169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169ed30

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169ed30

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1105

EP - 1113

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 4

ER -