"cADEAT": Considerazioni sull'impiego di CAD (computer aided diagnosis) in mammografia

Translated title of the contribution: "cADEAT": Considerations on the use of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography

R. Chersevani, S. Ciatto, C. Del Favero, A. Frigerio, L. Giordano, G. Giuseppetti, C. Naldoni, P. Panizza, M. Petrella, G. Saguatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has been extensively reported to increase sensitivity by about 10% when added to a single reading while increasing recall rate by 12%, and its current use can be safely recommended in clinical practice. CAD has been suggested as a possible alternative to conventional double reading in screening. Uncontrolled comparison is consistent and suggests that CAD is comparable to double reading in incremental cancer detection rate (CAD +10.6%, double reading +9.1%) and possibly better in recall rate (CAD +12.5%, double reading +28.8%). However, controlled studies comparing single reading + CAD to conventional double reading are not consistent and on average suggest a lower cancer detection rate (-5.1%) and a lower recall rate (-9.8%) for CAD. Scientific evidence is not sufficient for a safe recommendation of single reading + CAD as a current alternative to conventional double reading.

Translated title of the contribution"cADEAT": Considerations on the use of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)563-570
Number of pages8
JournalRadiologia Medica
Volume115
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '"cADEAT": Considerations on the use of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this