Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study

Rosana Freitas, Bernardo dos Santos, Carlo Altamura, Corrado Bernasconi, Ricardo Corral, Jonathan Evans, Ashok Malla, Marie Odile Krebs, Anna Lena Nordstroem, Mathias Zink, Josep Maria Haro, Helio Elkis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) and Non-Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (NTRS) may represent different subtypes of schizophrenia. However, few studies have investigated their PANSS symptom dimensions by Exploratory (EFA) or Confirmatory (CFA). Data from the present study are derived from 1429 patients of the Pattern study. TRS was defined by the use of clozapine in the previous year whereas NTRS by the use of non-clozapine antipsychotics ("by proxy"). Factors were chosen based on the Kaiser criterion and considered valid when loadings were greater than or equal to 0.5. The fit to the data was evaluated by CFA in comparison with well-established PANSS models, using fit indexes. The EFA yielded similar five-factor model in both groups: Negative, Positive, Anxiety/Depression, Cognitive and Excited. CFA showed a satisfactory, but not perfect, fit to the data, as compared with the previous PANSS factor analytic models. Despite the limitations regarding the ‘by proxy’ definition of TRS, the results of the present study show that there are no differences in the factorial structure of PANSS in patients with TRS and NTRS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-217
Number of pages8
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume276
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Cohort Studies
Proxy
Therapeutics
Clozapine
Antipsychotic Agents
Anxiety
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study. / Freitas, Rosana; dos Santos, Bernardo; Altamura, Carlo; Bernasconi, Corrado; Corral, Ricardo; Evans, Jonathan; Malla, Ashok; Krebs, Marie Odile; Nordstroem, Anna Lena; Zink, Mathias; Haro, Josep Maria; Elkis, Helio.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 276, 01.06.2019, p. 210-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freitas, Rosana ; dos Santos, Bernardo ; Altamura, Carlo ; Bernasconi, Corrado ; Corral, Ricardo ; Evans, Jonathan ; Malla, Ashok ; Krebs, Marie Odile ; Nordstroem, Anna Lena ; Zink, Mathias ; Haro, Josep Maria ; Elkis, Helio. / Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study. In: Psychiatry Research. 2019 ; Vol. 276. pp. 210-217.
@article{4f5d743a0d044d5ea540993815456cd6,
title = "Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study",
abstract = "Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) and Non-Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (NTRS) may represent different subtypes of schizophrenia. However, few studies have investigated their PANSS symptom dimensions by Exploratory (EFA) or Confirmatory (CFA). Data from the present study are derived from 1429 patients of the Pattern study. TRS was defined by the use of clozapine in the previous year whereas NTRS by the use of non-clozapine antipsychotics ({"}by proxy{"}). Factors were chosen based on the Kaiser criterion and considered valid when loadings were greater than or equal to 0.5. The fit to the data was evaluated by CFA in comparison with well-established PANSS models, using fit indexes. The EFA yielded similar five-factor model in both groups: Negative, Positive, Anxiety/Depression, Cognitive and Excited. CFA showed a satisfactory, but not perfect, fit to the data, as compared with the previous PANSS factor analytic models. Despite the limitations regarding the ‘by proxy’ definition of TRS, the results of the present study show that there are no differences in the factorial structure of PANSS in patients with TRS and NTRS.",
author = "Rosana Freitas and {dos Santos}, Bernardo and Carlo Altamura and Corrado Bernasconi and Ricardo Corral and Jonathan Evans and Ashok Malla and Krebs, {Marie Odile} and Nordstroem, {Anna Lena} and Mathias Zink and Haro, {Josep Maria} and Helio Elkis",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "276",
pages = "210--217",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study

AU - Freitas, Rosana

AU - dos Santos, Bernardo

AU - Altamura, Carlo

AU - Bernasconi, Corrado

AU - Corral, Ricardo

AU - Evans, Jonathan

AU - Malla, Ashok

AU - Krebs, Marie Odile

AU - Nordstroem, Anna Lena

AU - Zink, Mathias

AU - Haro, Josep Maria

AU - Elkis, Helio

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) and Non-Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (NTRS) may represent different subtypes of schizophrenia. However, few studies have investigated their PANSS symptom dimensions by Exploratory (EFA) or Confirmatory (CFA). Data from the present study are derived from 1429 patients of the Pattern study. TRS was defined by the use of clozapine in the previous year whereas NTRS by the use of non-clozapine antipsychotics ("by proxy"). Factors were chosen based on the Kaiser criterion and considered valid when loadings were greater than or equal to 0.5. The fit to the data was evaluated by CFA in comparison with well-established PANSS models, using fit indexes. The EFA yielded similar five-factor model in both groups: Negative, Positive, Anxiety/Depression, Cognitive and Excited. CFA showed a satisfactory, but not perfect, fit to the data, as compared with the previous PANSS factor analytic models. Despite the limitations regarding the ‘by proxy’ definition of TRS, the results of the present study show that there are no differences in the factorial structure of PANSS in patients with TRS and NTRS.

AB - Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) and Non-Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (NTRS) may represent different subtypes of schizophrenia. However, few studies have investigated their PANSS symptom dimensions by Exploratory (EFA) or Confirmatory (CFA). Data from the present study are derived from 1429 patients of the Pattern study. TRS was defined by the use of clozapine in the previous year whereas NTRS by the use of non-clozapine antipsychotics ("by proxy"). Factors were chosen based on the Kaiser criterion and considered valid when loadings were greater than or equal to 0.5. The fit to the data was evaluated by CFA in comparison with well-established PANSS models, using fit indexes. The EFA yielded similar five-factor model in both groups: Negative, Positive, Anxiety/Depression, Cognitive and Excited. CFA showed a satisfactory, but not perfect, fit to the data, as compared with the previous PANSS factor analytic models. Despite the limitations regarding the ‘by proxy’ definition of TRS, the results of the present study show that there are no differences in the factorial structure of PANSS in patients with TRS and NTRS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065737463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065737463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 276

SP - 210

EP - 217

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

ER -