Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery

Luigi Barile, Giovanni Landoni, Marina Pieri, Laura Ruggeri, Giulia Maj, Caetano Nigro Neto, Laura Pasin, Luca Cabrini, Alberto Zangrillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The authors measured cardiac index in unstable patients after cardiac surgery with the Pressure Recording Analytic Method (PRAM) and compared it with the reference method of thermodilution (ThD) with the pulmonary artery catheter; using the hypothesis that there were no significant differences between the 2 methods. Design: A prospective study. Setting: Cardiac surgery intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. Participants: Ninety-four measurements from 59 patients with ongoing high doses of inotropic drugs and/or an intra-aortic balloon pump for low-cardiac-output syndrome after cardiac surgery were studied. Interventions: The pulmonary artery catheter and the radial or femoral arterial catheter for measuring blood pressure were already in place for standard hemodynamic monitoring. Measurements and Main Results: The mean of the total CI measurements was 2.94±0.67 L/min/m2 with PRAM and 2.95±0.63 L/min/m2 with ThD, with no significant difference according to the linear mixed models analysis. The PRAM and ThD techniques were similar in unstable patients without atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.047±0.395 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 29%), while no agreement between PRAM and ThD was found in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.195±0.885 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 69%). Conclusion: Cardiac index measurements after cardiac surgery performed with PRAM and with ThD showed a good agreement in hemodynamically unstable patients given high doses of inotropes and/or an IABP in patients in sinus rhythm, but not in those with atrial fibrillation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1108-1113
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Critical Illness
Thoracic Surgery
Thermodilution
Pressure
Atrial Fibrillation
Catheters
Pulmonary Artery
Low Cardiac Output
Thigh
Teaching Hospitals
Intensive Care Units
Linear Models
Hemodynamics
Prospective Studies
Blood Pressure
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • atrial fibrillation
  • cardiac index
  • cardiac surgery
  • high-risk patients
  • intensive care
  • PRAM
  • pressure recording analytic method
  • pulmonary artery catheter
  • thermodilution
  • unstable patients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery. / Barile, Luigi; Landoni, Giovanni; Pieri, Marina; Ruggeri, Laura; Maj, Giulia; Nigro Neto, Caetano; Pasin, Laura; Cabrini, Luca; Zangrillo, Alberto.

In: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 27, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1108-1113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{afc081d297c74d41a0b61a1ad802dc1b,
title = "Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery",
abstract = "Objective: The authors measured cardiac index in unstable patients after cardiac surgery with the Pressure Recording Analytic Method (PRAM) and compared it with the reference method of thermodilution (ThD) with the pulmonary artery catheter; using the hypothesis that there were no significant differences between the 2 methods. Design: A prospective study. Setting: Cardiac surgery intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. Participants: Ninety-four measurements from 59 patients with ongoing high doses of inotropic drugs and/or an intra-aortic balloon pump for low-cardiac-output syndrome after cardiac surgery were studied. Interventions: The pulmonary artery catheter and the radial or femoral arterial catheter for measuring blood pressure were already in place for standard hemodynamic monitoring. Measurements and Main Results: The mean of the total CI measurements was 2.94±0.67 L/min/m2 with PRAM and 2.95±0.63 L/min/m2 with ThD, with no significant difference according to the linear mixed models analysis. The PRAM and ThD techniques were similar in unstable patients without atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.047±0.395 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 29{\%}), while no agreement between PRAM and ThD was found in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.195±0.885 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 69{\%}). Conclusion: Cardiac index measurements after cardiac surgery performed with PRAM and with ThD showed a good agreement in hemodynamically unstable patients given high doses of inotropes and/or an IABP in patients in sinus rhythm, but not in those with atrial fibrillation.",
keywords = "anesthesia, atrial fibrillation, cardiac index, cardiac surgery, high-risk patients, intensive care, PRAM, pressure recording analytic method, pulmonary artery catheter, thermodilution, unstable patients",
author = "Luigi Barile and Giovanni Landoni and Marina Pieri and Laura Ruggeri and Giulia Maj and {Nigro Neto}, Caetano and Laura Pasin and Luca Cabrini and Alberto Zangrillo",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.016",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1108--1113",
journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery

AU - Barile, Luigi

AU - Landoni, Giovanni

AU - Pieri, Marina

AU - Ruggeri, Laura

AU - Maj, Giulia

AU - Nigro Neto, Caetano

AU - Pasin, Laura

AU - Cabrini, Luca

AU - Zangrillo, Alberto

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Objective: The authors measured cardiac index in unstable patients after cardiac surgery with the Pressure Recording Analytic Method (PRAM) and compared it with the reference method of thermodilution (ThD) with the pulmonary artery catheter; using the hypothesis that there were no significant differences between the 2 methods. Design: A prospective study. Setting: Cardiac surgery intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. Participants: Ninety-four measurements from 59 patients with ongoing high doses of inotropic drugs and/or an intra-aortic balloon pump for low-cardiac-output syndrome after cardiac surgery were studied. Interventions: The pulmonary artery catheter and the radial or femoral arterial catheter for measuring blood pressure were already in place for standard hemodynamic monitoring. Measurements and Main Results: The mean of the total CI measurements was 2.94±0.67 L/min/m2 with PRAM and 2.95±0.63 L/min/m2 with ThD, with no significant difference according to the linear mixed models analysis. The PRAM and ThD techniques were similar in unstable patients without atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.047±0.395 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 29%), while no agreement between PRAM and ThD was found in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.195±0.885 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 69%). Conclusion: Cardiac index measurements after cardiac surgery performed with PRAM and with ThD showed a good agreement in hemodynamically unstable patients given high doses of inotropes and/or an IABP in patients in sinus rhythm, but not in those with atrial fibrillation.

AB - Objective: The authors measured cardiac index in unstable patients after cardiac surgery with the Pressure Recording Analytic Method (PRAM) and compared it with the reference method of thermodilution (ThD) with the pulmonary artery catheter; using the hypothesis that there were no significant differences between the 2 methods. Design: A prospective study. Setting: Cardiac surgery intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. Participants: Ninety-four measurements from 59 patients with ongoing high doses of inotropic drugs and/or an intra-aortic balloon pump for low-cardiac-output syndrome after cardiac surgery were studied. Interventions: The pulmonary artery catheter and the radial or femoral arterial catheter for measuring blood pressure were already in place for standard hemodynamic monitoring. Measurements and Main Results: The mean of the total CI measurements was 2.94±0.67 L/min/m2 with PRAM and 2.95±0.63 L/min/m2 with ThD, with no significant difference according to the linear mixed models analysis. The PRAM and ThD techniques were similar in unstable patients without atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.047±0.395 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 29%), while no agreement between PRAM and ThD was found in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation (mean bias 0.195±0.885 L/min/m2 and a percentage error of 69%). Conclusion: Cardiac index measurements after cardiac surgery performed with PRAM and with ThD showed a good agreement in hemodynamically unstable patients given high doses of inotropes and/or an IABP in patients in sinus rhythm, but not in those with atrial fibrillation.

KW - anesthesia

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - cardiac index

KW - cardiac surgery

KW - high-risk patients

KW - intensive care

KW - PRAM

KW - pressure recording analytic method

KW - pulmonary artery catheter

KW - thermodilution

KW - unstable patients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888299071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888299071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.016

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 23992652

AN - SCOPUS:84888299071

VL - 27

SP - 1108

EP - 1113

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 6

ER -