Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to patients after valve replacement

Franco Tarro Genta, Massimo Tidu, Zoia Bouslenko, Francesca Bertolin, Ilaria Salvetti, Fabio Comazzi, Pantaleo Giannuzzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate feasibility, safety, and outcome of an exercise-based residential cardiac rehabilitation program in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients compared to elderly patients after surgical valve replacement (sAVR).

METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2013, 65 consecutive TAVI and 70 sAVR older than 70 years were enrolled. Six-min walk test (6MWT) distance, Barthel index, Morse Fall Scale (MFS) on admission and discharge, Cumulative Illness Rated State-Comorbidity Index (CIRS-CI), and echocardiography were assessed. Patients underwent a 3-week intensive cardiac rehabilitation program.

RESULTS: Compared with sAVR, TAVI had worse CIRS-CI (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 3.4 ± 1.5; P = 0.00001), left ventricle ejection fraction (55.3 ± 9 vs. 59.2 ± 7.7; P = 0.008), Barthel index (67 ± 24 vs. 79 ± 21; P = 0.0018), and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 25 ± 19; P = 0.002) on admission and at discharge (Barthel index 85 ± 17 vs. 93 ± 14; P = 0.005 and MFS 30 ± 20 vs. 20 ± 12; P = 0.0001), despite a significant improvement at discharge of Barthel index (85 ± 17 vs. 67 ± 24; P = 0.001) and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 30 ± 20; P > 0.01). TAVI attended safely cardiac rehabilitation, but tolerated a significantly lower workload and had reduced 6MWT both on admission and discharge compared with sAVR (162 ± 87vs. 216 ± 82; P = 0.00001, and 240 ± 92 vs. 33295; P = 0.00001, respectively), despite a net improvement at discharge in 6MWT (240 ± 92 vs. 162 ± 92; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Intensive cardiac rehabilitation after TAVI is safe, well tolerated, and leads to a net improvement in disability, risk of falls, and exercise capacity, similar to that observed in less disabled sAVR patients, favoring home discharge and relatively independent life at home. A persistent higher disability, comorbidity profile, and risk of falls at discharge characterize TAVI patients compared with sAVR patients of similar age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-120
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Surgical Instruments
Comorbidity
Exercise
Workload
Heart Ventricles
Echocardiography
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Safety

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation
  • Comorbidity
  • Echocardiography, Doppler
  • Exercise
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Function, Left
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study

Cite this

Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to patients after valve replacement. / Tarro Genta, Franco; Tidu, Massimo; Bouslenko, Zoia; Bertolin, Francesca; Salvetti, Ilaria; Comazzi, Fabio; Giannuzzi, Pantaleo.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 2, 02.2017, p. 114-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tarro Genta, Franco ; Tidu, Massimo ; Bouslenko, Zoia ; Bertolin, Francesca ; Salvetti, Ilaria ; Comazzi, Fabio ; Giannuzzi, Pantaleo. / Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to patients after valve replacement. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 114-120.
@article{bcd5e9857e1f49278f0d933285ece442,
title = "Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to patients after valve replacement",
abstract = "AIMS: To evaluate feasibility, safety, and outcome of an exercise-based residential cardiac rehabilitation program in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients compared to elderly patients after surgical valve replacement (sAVR).METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2013, 65 consecutive TAVI and 70 sAVR older than 70 years were enrolled. Six-min walk test (6MWT) distance, Barthel index, Morse Fall Scale (MFS) on admission and discharge, Cumulative Illness Rated State-Comorbidity Index (CIRS-CI), and echocardiography were assessed. Patients underwent a 3-week intensive cardiac rehabilitation program.RESULTS: Compared with sAVR, TAVI had worse CIRS-CI (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 3.4 ± 1.5; P = 0.00001), left ventricle ejection fraction (55.3 ± 9 vs. 59.2 ± 7.7; P = 0.008), Barthel index (67 ± 24 vs. 79 ± 21; P = 0.0018), and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 25 ± 19; P = 0.002) on admission and at discharge (Barthel index 85 ± 17 vs. 93 ± 14; P = 0.005 and MFS 30 ± 20 vs. 20 ± 12; P = 0.0001), despite a significant improvement at discharge of Barthel index (85 ± 17 vs. 67 ± 24; P = 0.001) and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 30 ± 20; P > 0.01). TAVI attended safely cardiac rehabilitation, but tolerated a significantly lower workload and had reduced 6MWT both on admission and discharge compared with sAVR (162 ± 87vs. 216 ± 82; P = 0.00001, and 240 ± 92 vs. 33295; P = 0.00001, respectively), despite a net improvement at discharge in 6MWT (240 ± 92 vs. 162 ± 92; P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: Intensive cardiac rehabilitation after TAVI is safe, well tolerated, and leads to a net improvement in disability, risk of falls, and exercise capacity, similar to that observed in less disabled sAVR patients, favoring home discharge and relatively independent life at home. A persistent higher disability, comorbidity profile, and risk of falls at discharge characterize TAVI patients compared with sAVR patients of similar age.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Cardiac Rehabilitation, Comorbidity, Echocardiography, Doppler, Exercise, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Function, Left, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study",
author = "{Tarro Genta}, Franco and Massimo Tidu and Zoia Bouslenko and Francesca Bertolin and Ilaria Salvetti and Fabio Comazzi and Pantaleo Giannuzzi",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2459/JCM.0000000000000494",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "114--120",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine",
issn = "1558-2027",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to patients after valve replacement

AU - Tarro Genta, Franco

AU - Tidu, Massimo

AU - Bouslenko, Zoia

AU - Bertolin, Francesca

AU - Salvetti, Ilaria

AU - Comazzi, Fabio

AU - Giannuzzi, Pantaleo

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - AIMS: To evaluate feasibility, safety, and outcome of an exercise-based residential cardiac rehabilitation program in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients compared to elderly patients after surgical valve replacement (sAVR).METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2013, 65 consecutive TAVI and 70 sAVR older than 70 years were enrolled. Six-min walk test (6MWT) distance, Barthel index, Morse Fall Scale (MFS) on admission and discharge, Cumulative Illness Rated State-Comorbidity Index (CIRS-CI), and echocardiography were assessed. Patients underwent a 3-week intensive cardiac rehabilitation program.RESULTS: Compared with sAVR, TAVI had worse CIRS-CI (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 3.4 ± 1.5; P = 0.00001), left ventricle ejection fraction (55.3 ± 9 vs. 59.2 ± 7.7; P = 0.008), Barthel index (67 ± 24 vs. 79 ± 21; P = 0.0018), and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 25 ± 19; P = 0.002) on admission and at discharge (Barthel index 85 ± 17 vs. 93 ± 14; P = 0.005 and MFS 30 ± 20 vs. 20 ± 12; P = 0.0001), despite a significant improvement at discharge of Barthel index (85 ± 17 vs. 67 ± 24; P = 0.001) and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 30 ± 20; P > 0.01). TAVI attended safely cardiac rehabilitation, but tolerated a significantly lower workload and had reduced 6MWT both on admission and discharge compared with sAVR (162 ± 87vs. 216 ± 82; P = 0.00001, and 240 ± 92 vs. 33295; P = 0.00001, respectively), despite a net improvement at discharge in 6MWT (240 ± 92 vs. 162 ± 92; P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: Intensive cardiac rehabilitation after TAVI is safe, well tolerated, and leads to a net improvement in disability, risk of falls, and exercise capacity, similar to that observed in less disabled sAVR patients, favoring home discharge and relatively independent life at home. A persistent higher disability, comorbidity profile, and risk of falls at discharge characterize TAVI patients compared with sAVR patients of similar age.

AB - AIMS: To evaluate feasibility, safety, and outcome of an exercise-based residential cardiac rehabilitation program in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients compared to elderly patients after surgical valve replacement (sAVR).METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2013, 65 consecutive TAVI and 70 sAVR older than 70 years were enrolled. Six-min walk test (6MWT) distance, Barthel index, Morse Fall Scale (MFS) on admission and discharge, Cumulative Illness Rated State-Comorbidity Index (CIRS-CI), and echocardiography were assessed. Patients underwent a 3-week intensive cardiac rehabilitation program.RESULTS: Compared with sAVR, TAVI had worse CIRS-CI (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 3.4 ± 1.5; P = 0.00001), left ventricle ejection fraction (55.3 ± 9 vs. 59.2 ± 7.7; P = 0.008), Barthel index (67 ± 24 vs. 79 ± 21; P = 0.0018), and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 25 ± 19; P = 0.002) on admission and at discharge (Barthel index 85 ± 17 vs. 93 ± 14; P = 0.005 and MFS 30 ± 20 vs. 20 ± 12; P = 0.0001), despite a significant improvement at discharge of Barthel index (85 ± 17 vs. 67 ± 24; P = 0.001) and MFS (36 ± 22 vs. 30 ± 20; P > 0.01). TAVI attended safely cardiac rehabilitation, but tolerated a significantly lower workload and had reduced 6MWT both on admission and discharge compared with sAVR (162 ± 87vs. 216 ± 82; P = 0.00001, and 240 ± 92 vs. 33295; P = 0.00001, respectively), despite a net improvement at discharge in 6MWT (240 ± 92 vs. 162 ± 92; P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: Intensive cardiac rehabilitation after TAVI is safe, well tolerated, and leads to a net improvement in disability, risk of falls, and exercise capacity, similar to that observed in less disabled sAVR patients, favoring home discharge and relatively independent life at home. A persistent higher disability, comorbidity profile, and risk of falls at discharge characterize TAVI patients compared with sAVR patients of similar age.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Aortic Valve

KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis

KW - Cardiac Rehabilitation

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Echocardiography, Doppler

KW - Exercise

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Italy

KW - Male

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Ventricular Function, Left

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

KW - Observational Study

U2 - 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000494

DO - 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000494

M3 - Article

C2 - 27941588

VL - 18

SP - 114

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

SN - 1558-2027

IS - 2

ER -