TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardio-oncology organization patterns in Italy
T2 - One size does not fit all
AU - Canale, Maria Laura
AU - Lestuzzi, Chiara
AU - Bisceglia, Irma
AU - Vallerio, Paola
AU - Parrini, Iris
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Aims Cardio-oncology is imposing as the specialty deputed to the management of a large and rapidly increasing population of cancer patients receiving anticancer treatments with cardiovascular side effects or presenting with cardiac and oncological comorbidities. Organization patterns dramatically vary across Italy. Methods On the behalf of ANMCO, we have analyzed the characteristics of cardio-oncology services across different hospital types in Italy. A questionnaire was sent out to all ANMCOdivisions inquiring about innerorganization,workload, multidisciplinary team and inter-hospital connections. Results Ninety-eight centers sent back the questionnaire. We summarize different paths into four reference assistance models (sizes XL, L, M and S) according to hospital characteristics, cardio-oncology population size, specialists availability, local facilities and the hospitalsurrounding network. We define sizes of the proposed pathways highlighting the need to tailor the model in each single situation. Conclusion No single cardio-oncology organization model can be applied to all hospitals. Each center could select the size/model that best fits its organization. Multidisciplinarity and networking play a crucial role.
AB - Aims Cardio-oncology is imposing as the specialty deputed to the management of a large and rapidly increasing population of cancer patients receiving anticancer treatments with cardiovascular side effects or presenting with cardiac and oncological comorbidities. Organization patterns dramatically vary across Italy. Methods On the behalf of ANMCO, we have analyzed the characteristics of cardio-oncology services across different hospital types in Italy. A questionnaire was sent out to all ANMCOdivisions inquiring about innerorganization,workload, multidisciplinary team and inter-hospital connections. Results Ninety-eight centers sent back the questionnaire. We summarize different paths into four reference assistance models (sizes XL, L, M and S) according to hospital characteristics, cardio-oncology population size, specialists availability, local facilities and the hospitalsurrounding network. We define sizes of the proposed pathways highlighting the need to tailor the model in each single situation. Conclusion No single cardio-oncology organization model can be applied to all hospitals. Each center could select the size/model that best fits its organization. Multidisciplinarity and networking play a crucial role.
KW - Cardio-oncology
KW - Organization
KW - Pathway
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045195185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045195185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000642
DO - 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000642
M3 - Article
C2 - 29528869
AN - SCOPUS:85045195185
VL - 19
SP - 229
EP - 233
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
SN - 1558-2027
IS - 5
ER -