Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical and prognostic assessment of diastolic heart failure

Marco Guazzi, Jonathan Myers, Ross Arena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the relative prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved versus reduced systolic function. BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has an established role in the assessment of patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). Two variables, peak Vo2 and, more recently, the Ve/Vco2 slope, have been shown to be extremely valuable in risk stratification. However, data are lacking in terms of the prognostic value of CPET in patients with diastolic heart failure (DHF). METHODS: A total of 409 HF patients underwent CPET. Patients were divided into three groups according to the following left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoffs: 2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope to predict total mortality and hospitalization were examined. RESULTS: At univariate Cox regression analysis, both the peak Vo2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope were significant predictors in SHF and DHF. Multivariate analysis documented a similar prognostic power of Ve/Vco2 slope and peak Vo2 in all SHF groups. Conversely, in DHF patients, Ve/Vco2 slope outnumbered peak Vo 2, remaining the only predictor regardless of LVEF. In DHF, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Ve/Vco 2slope identified a cutoff of 32.6 (74% sensitivity, 52% specificity), 33.1 (76% sensitivity, 62% specificity), and 33.3 (97% sensitivity, 40% specificity) for an LVEF cutoff of 2 holds clinical and prognostic impact in this increasing subset of patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1883-1890
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 15 2005

Fingerprint

Diastolic Heart Failure
Exercise
Systolic Heart Failure
Stroke Volume
Sensitivity and Specificity
Heart Failure
ROC Curve
Hospitalization
Multivariate Analysis
Regression Analysis
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical and prognostic assessment of diastolic heart failure. / Guazzi, Marco; Myers, Jonathan; Arena, Ross.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 46, No. 10, 15.11.2005, p. 1883-1890.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47aa0e7bad52446f9e29e6573131230c,
title = "Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical and prognostic assessment of diastolic heart failure",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the relative prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved versus reduced systolic function. BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has an established role in the assessment of patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). Two variables, peak Vo2 and, more recently, the Ve/Vco2 slope, have been shown to be extremely valuable in risk stratification. However, data are lacking in terms of the prognostic value of CPET in patients with diastolic heart failure (DHF). METHODS: A total of 409 HF patients underwent CPET. Patients were divided into three groups according to the following left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoffs: 2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope to predict total mortality and hospitalization were examined. RESULTS: At univariate Cox regression analysis, both the peak Vo2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope were significant predictors in SHF and DHF. Multivariate analysis documented a similar prognostic power of Ve/Vco2 slope and peak Vo2 in all SHF groups. Conversely, in DHF patients, Ve/Vco2 slope outnumbered peak Vo 2, remaining the only predictor regardless of LVEF. In DHF, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Ve/Vco 2slope identified a cutoff of 32.6 (74{\%} sensitivity, 52{\%} specificity), 33.1 (76{\%} sensitivity, 62{\%} specificity), and 33.3 (97{\%} sensitivity, 40{\%} specificity) for an LVEF cutoff of 2 holds clinical and prognostic impact in this increasing subset of patients.",
author = "Marco Guazzi and Jonathan Myers and Ross Arena",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.051",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1883--1890",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical and prognostic assessment of diastolic heart failure

AU - Guazzi, Marco

AU - Myers, Jonathan

AU - Arena, Ross

PY - 2005/11/15

Y1 - 2005/11/15

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the relative prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved versus reduced systolic function. BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has an established role in the assessment of patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). Two variables, peak Vo2 and, more recently, the Ve/Vco2 slope, have been shown to be extremely valuable in risk stratification. However, data are lacking in terms of the prognostic value of CPET in patients with diastolic heart failure (DHF). METHODS: A total of 409 HF patients underwent CPET. Patients were divided into three groups according to the following left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoffs: 2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope to predict total mortality and hospitalization were examined. RESULTS: At univariate Cox regression analysis, both the peak Vo2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope were significant predictors in SHF and DHF. Multivariate analysis documented a similar prognostic power of Ve/Vco2 slope and peak Vo2 in all SHF groups. Conversely, in DHF patients, Ve/Vco2 slope outnumbered peak Vo 2, remaining the only predictor regardless of LVEF. In DHF, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Ve/Vco 2slope identified a cutoff of 32.6 (74% sensitivity, 52% specificity), 33.1 (76% sensitivity, 62% specificity), and 33.3 (97% sensitivity, 40% specificity) for an LVEF cutoff of 2 holds clinical and prognostic impact in this increasing subset of patients.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the relative prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved versus reduced systolic function. BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has an established role in the assessment of patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). Two variables, peak Vo2 and, more recently, the Ve/Vco2 slope, have been shown to be extremely valuable in risk stratification. However, data are lacking in terms of the prognostic value of CPET in patients with diastolic heart failure (DHF). METHODS: A total of 409 HF patients underwent CPET. Patients were divided into three groups according to the following left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoffs: 2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope to predict total mortality and hospitalization were examined. RESULTS: At univariate Cox regression analysis, both the peak Vo2 and the Ve/Vco2 slope were significant predictors in SHF and DHF. Multivariate analysis documented a similar prognostic power of Ve/Vco2 slope and peak Vo2 in all SHF groups. Conversely, in DHF patients, Ve/Vco2 slope outnumbered peak Vo 2, remaining the only predictor regardless of LVEF. In DHF, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Ve/Vco 2slope identified a cutoff of 32.6 (74% sensitivity, 52% specificity), 33.1 (76% sensitivity, 62% specificity), and 33.3 (97% sensitivity, 40% specificity) for an LVEF cutoff of 2 holds clinical and prognostic impact in this increasing subset of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644449703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644449703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.051

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.051

M3 - Article

C2 - 16286176

AN - SCOPUS:27644449703

VL - 46

SP - 1883

EP - 1890

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 10

ER -