Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Relevant but underused

Daniel E. Forman, Jonathan Myers, Carl J. Lavie, Marco Guazzi, Bartolome Celli, Ross Arena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a relatively old technology, but has sustained relevance for many primary care clinical scenarios in which it is, ironically, rarely considered. Advancing computer technology has made CPX easier to administer and interpret at a time when our aging population is more prone to comorbidities and higher prevalence of nonspecific symptoms of exercise intolerance and dyspnea, for which CPX is particularly useful diagnostically and prognostically. These discrepancies in application are compounded by patterns in which CPX is often administered and interpreted by cardiology, pulmonary, or exercise specialists who limit their assessments to the priorities of their own discipline, thereby missing opportunities to distinguish symptom origins. When used properly, CPX enables the physician to assess fitness and uncover cardiopulmonary issues at earlier phases of work-up, which would therefore be especially useful for primary care physicians. In this article, we provide an overview of CPX principles and testing logistics, as well as some of the clinical contexts in which it can enhance patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-86
Number of pages19
JournalPostgraduate Medicine
Volume122
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Exercise
Technology
Primary Care Physicians
Cardiology
Dyspnea
Comorbidity
Primary Health Care
Patient Care
Physicians
Lung
Population

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
  • Diagnosis
  • Functional capacity
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Forman, D. E., Myers, J., Lavie, C. J., Guazzi, M., Celli, B., & Arena, R. (2010). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Relevant but underused. Postgraduate Medicine, 122(6), 68-86. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2225

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing : Relevant but underused. / Forman, Daniel E.; Myers, Jonathan; Lavie, Carl J.; Guazzi, Marco; Celli, Bartolome; Arena, Ross.

In: Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 122, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 68-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forman, DE, Myers, J, Lavie, CJ, Guazzi, M, Celli, B & Arena, R 2010, 'Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Relevant but underused', Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 68-86. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2225
Forman, Daniel E. ; Myers, Jonathan ; Lavie, Carl J. ; Guazzi, Marco ; Celli, Bartolome ; Arena, Ross. / Cardiopulmonary exercise testing : Relevant but underused. In: Postgraduate Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 122, No. 6. pp. 68-86.
@article{6c24842a3f744c47a11d3e9a9c45b6b4,
title = "Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Relevant but underused",
abstract = "Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a relatively old technology, but has sustained relevance for many primary care clinical scenarios in which it is, ironically, rarely considered. Advancing computer technology has made CPX easier to administer and interpret at a time when our aging population is more prone to comorbidities and higher prevalence of nonspecific symptoms of exercise intolerance and dyspnea, for which CPX is particularly useful diagnostically and prognostically. These discrepancies in application are compounded by patterns in which CPX is often administered and interpreted by cardiology, pulmonary, or exercise specialists who limit their assessments to the priorities of their own discipline, thereby missing opportunities to distinguish symptom origins. When used properly, CPX enables the physician to assess fitness and uncover cardiopulmonary issues at earlier phases of work-up, which would therefore be especially useful for primary care physicians. In this article, we provide an overview of CPX principles and testing logistics, as well as some of the clinical contexts in which it can enhance patient care.",
keywords = "Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, Diagnosis, Functional capacity, Prognosis",
author = "Forman, {Daniel E.} and Jonathan Myers and Lavie, {Carl J.} and Marco Guazzi and Bartolome Celli and Ross Arena",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2225",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "68--86",
journal = "Postgraduate Medicine",
issn = "0032-5481",
publisher = "Medquest Communications LLC",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

T2 - Relevant but underused

AU - Forman, Daniel E.

AU - Myers, Jonathan

AU - Lavie, Carl J.

AU - Guazzi, Marco

AU - Celli, Bartolome

AU - Arena, Ross

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a relatively old technology, but has sustained relevance for many primary care clinical scenarios in which it is, ironically, rarely considered. Advancing computer technology has made CPX easier to administer and interpret at a time when our aging population is more prone to comorbidities and higher prevalence of nonspecific symptoms of exercise intolerance and dyspnea, for which CPX is particularly useful diagnostically and prognostically. These discrepancies in application are compounded by patterns in which CPX is often administered and interpreted by cardiology, pulmonary, or exercise specialists who limit their assessments to the priorities of their own discipline, thereby missing opportunities to distinguish symptom origins. When used properly, CPX enables the physician to assess fitness and uncover cardiopulmonary issues at earlier phases of work-up, which would therefore be especially useful for primary care physicians. In this article, we provide an overview of CPX principles and testing logistics, as well as some of the clinical contexts in which it can enhance patient care.

AB - Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a relatively old technology, but has sustained relevance for many primary care clinical scenarios in which it is, ironically, rarely considered. Advancing computer technology has made CPX easier to administer and interpret at a time when our aging population is more prone to comorbidities and higher prevalence of nonspecific symptoms of exercise intolerance and dyspnea, for which CPX is particularly useful diagnostically and prognostically. These discrepancies in application are compounded by patterns in which CPX is often administered and interpreted by cardiology, pulmonary, or exercise specialists who limit their assessments to the priorities of their own discipline, thereby missing opportunities to distinguish symptom origins. When used properly, CPX enables the physician to assess fitness and uncover cardiopulmonary issues at earlier phases of work-up, which would therefore be especially useful for primary care physicians. In this article, we provide an overview of CPX principles and testing logistics, as well as some of the clinical contexts in which it can enhance patient care.

KW - Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Functional capacity

KW - Prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952200025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952200025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2225

DO - 10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2225

M3 - Article

C2 - 21084784

AN - SCOPUS:79952200025

VL - 122

SP - 68

EP - 86

JO - Postgraduate Medicine

JF - Postgraduate Medicine

SN - 0032-5481

IS - 6

ER -