Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Tommaso Sanna, Giuseppe La Torre, Chiara de Waure, Andrea Scapigliati, Walter Ricciardi, Antonio Dello Russo, Gemma Pelargonio, Michela Casella, Fulvio Bellocci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) accounts for 250.000-350.000 sudden cardiac deaths per year in the United States. The availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) promoted the implementation of public access defibrillation programs based on out-of-hospital early defibrillation by non-healthcare professionals. Aim of the study: To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the pooled effect of studies comparing the outcome of pts receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus AED therapy (CPR + AED) vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone, both delivered by non-healthcare professionals, for the treatment of OHCA. Methods: We performed a search of the relevant literature exploring major scientific databases, carrying out a hand search of key journals, analysing conference proceedings and abstracts and discussing the topic with other researchers. Two analyses were planned to assess the outcomes of interest (survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge). Results: Three studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The first meta-analysis evidenced a RR of 1.22 (95% C.I.: 1.04-1.43) of surviving to hospital admission for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. The second meta-analysis showed a RR of 1.39 (95% C.I.: 1.06-1.83) of surviving to hospital discharge for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that programs based on CPR plus early defibrillation with AEDs by trained non-healthcare professionals offer a survival advantage over CPR-only in OHCA. The conclusions of our meta-analysis add to previous evidence in favour of developing public-health strategies based on AED use by trained layrescuers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-232
Number of pages7
JournalResuscitation
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Defibrillators
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Meta-Analysis
Sudden Cardiac Death
Public Health
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

Keywords

  • Automated external defibrillator (AED)
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
  • Meta-analysis
  • Out-of-hospital CPR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals : A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. / Sanna, Tommaso; La Torre, Giuseppe; de Waure, Chiara; Scapigliati, Andrea; Ricciardi, Walter; Russo, Antonio Dello; Pelargonio, Gemma; Casella, Michela; Bellocci, Fulvio.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 76, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 226-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sanna, Tommaso ; La Torre, Giuseppe ; de Waure, Chiara ; Scapigliati, Andrea ; Ricciardi, Walter ; Russo, Antonio Dello ; Pelargonio, Gemma ; Casella, Michela ; Bellocci, Fulvio. / Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals : A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In: Resuscitation. 2008 ; Vol. 76, No. 2. pp. 226-232.
@article{fc4dcb7fe7584e628726572df1bb7256,
title = "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest",
abstract = "Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) accounts for 250.000-350.000 sudden cardiac deaths per year in the United States. The availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) promoted the implementation of public access defibrillation programs based on out-of-hospital early defibrillation by non-healthcare professionals. Aim of the study: To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the pooled effect of studies comparing the outcome of pts receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus AED therapy (CPR + AED) vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone, both delivered by non-healthcare professionals, for the treatment of OHCA. Methods: We performed a search of the relevant literature exploring major scientific databases, carrying out a hand search of key journals, analysing conference proceedings and abstracts and discussing the topic with other researchers. Two analyses were planned to assess the outcomes of interest (survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge). Results: Three studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The first meta-analysis evidenced a RR of 1.22 (95{\%} C.I.: 1.04-1.43) of surviving to hospital admission for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. The second meta-analysis showed a RR of 1.39 (95{\%} C.I.: 1.06-1.83) of surviving to hospital discharge for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that programs based on CPR plus early defibrillation with AEDs by trained non-healthcare professionals offer a survival advantage over CPR-only in OHCA. The conclusions of our meta-analysis add to previous evidence in favour of developing public-health strategies based on AED use by trained layrescuers.",
keywords = "Automated external defibrillator (AED), Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Meta-analysis, Out-of-hospital CPR",
author = "Tommaso Sanna and {La Torre}, Giuseppe and {de Waure}, Chiara and Andrea Scapigliati and Walter Ricciardi and Russo, {Antonio Dello} and Gemma Pelargonio and Michela Casella and Fulvio Bellocci",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "226--232",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals

T2 - A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AU - Sanna, Tommaso

AU - La Torre, Giuseppe

AU - de Waure, Chiara

AU - Scapigliati, Andrea

AU - Ricciardi, Walter

AU - Russo, Antonio Dello

AU - Pelargonio, Gemma

AU - Casella, Michela

AU - Bellocci, Fulvio

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) accounts for 250.000-350.000 sudden cardiac deaths per year in the United States. The availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) promoted the implementation of public access defibrillation programs based on out-of-hospital early defibrillation by non-healthcare professionals. Aim of the study: To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the pooled effect of studies comparing the outcome of pts receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus AED therapy (CPR + AED) vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone, both delivered by non-healthcare professionals, for the treatment of OHCA. Methods: We performed a search of the relevant literature exploring major scientific databases, carrying out a hand search of key journals, analysing conference proceedings and abstracts and discussing the topic with other researchers. Two analyses were planned to assess the outcomes of interest (survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge). Results: Three studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The first meta-analysis evidenced a RR of 1.22 (95% C.I.: 1.04-1.43) of surviving to hospital admission for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. The second meta-analysis showed a RR of 1.39 (95% C.I.: 1.06-1.83) of surviving to hospital discharge for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that programs based on CPR plus early defibrillation with AEDs by trained non-healthcare professionals offer a survival advantage over CPR-only in OHCA. The conclusions of our meta-analysis add to previous evidence in favour of developing public-health strategies based on AED use by trained layrescuers.

AB - Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) accounts for 250.000-350.000 sudden cardiac deaths per year in the United States. The availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) promoted the implementation of public access defibrillation programs based on out-of-hospital early defibrillation by non-healthcare professionals. Aim of the study: To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the pooled effect of studies comparing the outcome of pts receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus AED therapy (CPR + AED) vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone, both delivered by non-healthcare professionals, for the treatment of OHCA. Methods: We performed a search of the relevant literature exploring major scientific databases, carrying out a hand search of key journals, analysing conference proceedings and abstracts and discussing the topic with other researchers. Two analyses were planned to assess the outcomes of interest (survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge). Results: Three studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The first meta-analysis evidenced a RR of 1.22 (95% C.I.: 1.04-1.43) of surviving to hospital admission for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. The second meta-analysis showed a RR of 1.39 (95% C.I.: 1.06-1.83) of surviving to hospital discharge for people treated with CPR + AED as compared to CPR-only. Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that programs based on CPR plus early defibrillation with AEDs by trained non-healthcare professionals offer a survival advantage over CPR-only in OHCA. The conclusions of our meta-analysis add to previous evidence in favour of developing public-health strategies based on AED use by trained layrescuers.

KW - Automated external defibrillator (AED)

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Out-of-hospital CPR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849030740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849030740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17875357

AN - SCOPUS:37849030740

VL - 76

SP - 226

EP - 232

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 2

ER -