Cell-Free Scaffolds in Cartilage Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence

Luca Andriolo, Davide Reale, Alessandro Di Martino, Angelo Boffa, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giuseppe Filardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence and results of cell-free scaffold techniques for knee chondral lesions.

DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted on 3 medical electronic databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, and the methodological quality was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score. A meta-analysis was performed on the articles reporting results for visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. In order to investigate the clinical results improvement over time of cell-free cartilage scaffold implantation, all scores were reported and analyzed as improvement from basal scores at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up.

RESULTS: A total of 23 studies involving 521 patients were included in the qualitative data synthesis. The Coleman score showed an overall poor study quality with the majority of studies reporting results at short-/mid-term follow-up. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing a significant improvement from basal score at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up. The improvement reached at 1 year remained stable up to the last follow-up for all scores.

CONCLUSIONS: The current literature suggests that cell-free scaffolds may provide good clinical short-/mid-term results; however, the low evidence of the published studies and their short mean follow-up demand further evidence before more definitive conclusions can be drawn on their real potential over time and on their advantages and disadvantages compared to the cell-based strategies for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalCartilage
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Jun 5 2019

Fingerprint

Cartilage
Scaffolds
Surgery
Meta-Analysis
Knee
Electronic medical equipment
Medical Electronics
Visual Analog Scale
Documentation
Databases
Guidelines
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • cartilage
  • cell-free
  • knee
  • matrix
  • scaffold

Cite this

Cell-Free Scaffolds in Cartilage Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence. / Andriolo, Luca; Reale, Davide; Di Martino, Alessandro; Boffa, Angelo; Zaffagnini, Stefano; Filardo, Giuseppe.

In: Cartilage, 05.06.2019, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ccd8c79ae374d86acdc8a21440ca39a,
title = "Cell-Free Scaffolds in Cartilage Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence and results of cell-free scaffold techniques for knee chondral lesions.DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted on 3 medical electronic databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, and the methodological quality was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score. A meta-analysis was performed on the articles reporting results for visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. In order to investigate the clinical results improvement over time of cell-free cartilage scaffold implantation, all scores were reported and analyzed as improvement from basal scores at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up.RESULTS: A total of 23 studies involving 521 patients were included in the qualitative data synthesis. The Coleman score showed an overall poor study quality with the majority of studies reporting results at short-/mid-term follow-up. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing a significant improvement from basal score at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up. The improvement reached at 1 year remained stable up to the last follow-up for all scores.CONCLUSIONS: The current literature suggests that cell-free scaffolds may provide good clinical short-/mid-term results; however, the low evidence of the published studies and their short mean follow-up demand further evidence before more definitive conclusions can be drawn on their real potential over time and on their advantages and disadvantages compared to the cell-based strategies for the treatment of cartilage lesions.",
keywords = "cartilage, cell-free, knee, matrix, scaffold",
author = "Luca Andriolo and Davide Reale and {Di Martino}, Alessandro and Angelo Boffa and Stefano Zaffagnini and Giuseppe Filardo",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1947603519852406",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Cartilage",
issn = "1947-6035",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cell-Free Scaffolds in Cartilage Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence

AU - Andriolo, Luca

AU - Reale, Davide

AU - Di Martino, Alessandro

AU - Boffa, Angelo

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

AU - Filardo, Giuseppe

PY - 2019/6/5

Y1 - 2019/6/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence and results of cell-free scaffold techniques for knee chondral lesions.DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted on 3 medical electronic databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, and the methodological quality was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score. A meta-analysis was performed on the articles reporting results for visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. In order to investigate the clinical results improvement over time of cell-free cartilage scaffold implantation, all scores were reported and analyzed as improvement from basal scores at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up.RESULTS: A total of 23 studies involving 521 patients were included in the qualitative data synthesis. The Coleman score showed an overall poor study quality with the majority of studies reporting results at short-/mid-term follow-up. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing a significant improvement from basal score at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up. The improvement reached at 1 year remained stable up to the last follow-up for all scores.CONCLUSIONS: The current literature suggests that cell-free scaffolds may provide good clinical short-/mid-term results; however, the low evidence of the published studies and their short mean follow-up demand further evidence before more definitive conclusions can be drawn on their real potential over time and on their advantages and disadvantages compared to the cell-based strategies for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence and results of cell-free scaffold techniques for knee chondral lesions.DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted on 3 medical electronic databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, and the methodological quality was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score. A meta-analysis was performed on the articles reporting results for visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. In order to investigate the clinical results improvement over time of cell-free cartilage scaffold implantation, all scores were reported and analyzed as improvement from basal scores at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up.RESULTS: A total of 23 studies involving 521 patients were included in the qualitative data synthesis. The Coleman score showed an overall poor study quality with the majority of studies reporting results at short-/mid-term follow-up. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing a significant improvement from basal score at 1, 2, and ≥3 years' follow-up. The improvement reached at 1 year remained stable up to the last follow-up for all scores.CONCLUSIONS: The current literature suggests that cell-free scaffolds may provide good clinical short-/mid-term results; however, the low evidence of the published studies and their short mean follow-up demand further evidence before more definitive conclusions can be drawn on their real potential over time and on their advantages and disadvantages compared to the cell-based strategies for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

KW - cartilage

KW - cell-free

KW - knee

KW - matrix

KW - scaffold

U2 - 10.1177/1947603519852406

DO - 10.1177/1947603519852406

M3 - Article

C2 - 31166117

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Cartilage

JF - Cartilage

SN - 1947-6035

ER -