Central venous long-term access: Are there new standards?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite their wide use, there's no consensus regarding the most efficient or safest method to insert long-term central lines. Basically, insertion can be accomplished by surgical cutdown approach or percutaneously and subclavian percutaneous venipuncture is historically the most popular route. Percutaneous approach to the internal jugular vein is generally considered less prone to severe complications, but data coming from large studies are mostly retrospective. Influence of surgical cutdown on late complications (e.g. venous thrombosis) is so far unknown. At least 14 trials addressed the issue of ultrasound guidance, and in 2002 the NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence - UK) produced the recommendation that 2-D imaging ultrasound guidance should be the preferred method when inserting of central venous catheter into the internal jugular vein in 'elective situations'. Aim of this paper is to critically review the available evidence about this topic, demonstrating that further randomised clinical trials of adequate statistic power are still needed to obtain an evidence-based consensus, possibly including differential costs, patients' compliance and satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-80
Number of pages6
JournalNutritional Therapy and Metabolism
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Jugular Veins
jugular vein
Consensus
patient compliance
Phlebotomy
randomized clinical trials
Central Venous Catheters
thrombosis
Patient Compliance
Patient Satisfaction
catheters
Venous Thrombosis
ultrasonography
Ultrasonography
statistics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Retrospective Studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
methodology
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Central venous catheters
  • Chemotherapy
  • Costs
  • Quality of life assessment
  • Total parenteral nutrition
  • US guidance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Anatomy
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Central venous long-term access : Are there new standards? / Biffi, Roberto.

In: Nutritional Therapy and Metabolism, Vol. 24, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 75-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a58e8cde81d4fd48e5633cdcf289aa7,
title = "Central venous long-term access: Are there new standards?",
abstract = "Despite their wide use, there's no consensus regarding the most efficient or safest method to insert long-term central lines. Basically, insertion can be accomplished by surgical cutdown approach or percutaneously and subclavian percutaneous venipuncture is historically the most popular route. Percutaneous approach to the internal jugular vein is generally considered less prone to severe complications, but data coming from large studies are mostly retrospective. Influence of surgical cutdown on late complications (e.g. venous thrombosis) is so far unknown. At least 14 trials addressed the issue of ultrasound guidance, and in 2002 the NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence - UK) produced the recommendation that 2-D imaging ultrasound guidance should be the preferred method when inserting of central venous catheter into the internal jugular vein in 'elective situations'. Aim of this paper is to critically review the available evidence about this topic, demonstrating that further randomised clinical trials of adequate statistic power are still needed to obtain an evidence-based consensus, possibly including differential costs, patients' compliance and satisfaction.",
keywords = "Central venous catheters, Chemotherapy, Costs, Quality of life assessment, Total parenteral nutrition, US guidance",
author = "Roberto Biffi",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "75--80",
journal = "Rivista Italiana di Nutrizione Parenterale ed Enterale",
issn = "1828-6232",
publisher = "Wichtig Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Central venous long-term access

T2 - Are there new standards?

AU - Biffi, Roberto

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Despite their wide use, there's no consensus regarding the most efficient or safest method to insert long-term central lines. Basically, insertion can be accomplished by surgical cutdown approach or percutaneously and subclavian percutaneous venipuncture is historically the most popular route. Percutaneous approach to the internal jugular vein is generally considered less prone to severe complications, but data coming from large studies are mostly retrospective. Influence of surgical cutdown on late complications (e.g. venous thrombosis) is so far unknown. At least 14 trials addressed the issue of ultrasound guidance, and in 2002 the NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence - UK) produced the recommendation that 2-D imaging ultrasound guidance should be the preferred method when inserting of central venous catheter into the internal jugular vein in 'elective situations'. Aim of this paper is to critically review the available evidence about this topic, demonstrating that further randomised clinical trials of adequate statistic power are still needed to obtain an evidence-based consensus, possibly including differential costs, patients' compliance and satisfaction.

AB - Despite their wide use, there's no consensus regarding the most efficient or safest method to insert long-term central lines. Basically, insertion can be accomplished by surgical cutdown approach or percutaneously and subclavian percutaneous venipuncture is historically the most popular route. Percutaneous approach to the internal jugular vein is generally considered less prone to severe complications, but data coming from large studies are mostly retrospective. Influence of surgical cutdown on late complications (e.g. venous thrombosis) is so far unknown. At least 14 trials addressed the issue of ultrasound guidance, and in 2002 the NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence - UK) produced the recommendation that 2-D imaging ultrasound guidance should be the preferred method when inserting of central venous catheter into the internal jugular vein in 'elective situations'. Aim of this paper is to critically review the available evidence about this topic, demonstrating that further randomised clinical trials of adequate statistic power are still needed to obtain an evidence-based consensus, possibly including differential costs, patients' compliance and satisfaction.

KW - Central venous catheters

KW - Chemotherapy

KW - Costs

KW - Quality of life assessment

KW - Total parenteral nutrition

KW - US guidance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250744656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250744656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250744656

VL - 24

SP - 75

EP - 80

JO - Rivista Italiana di Nutrizione Parenterale ed Enterale

JF - Rivista Italiana di Nutrizione Parenterale ed Enterale

SN - 1828-6232

IS - 2

ER -