Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates hand blink reflex: implications for defensive behavior in humans

Tommaso Bocci, Roberta Ferrucci, Davide Barloscio, Laura Parenti, Francesca Cortese, Alberto Priori, Ferdinando Sartucci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cerebellum is involved in a wide number of integrative functions. We evaluated the role of cerebellum in peripersonal defensive behavior, as assessed by the so-called hand blink reflex (HBR), modulating cerebellar activity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy subjects underwent cerebellar (sham, anodal, and cathodal tcDCS) and motor cortex tDCS (anodal or cathodal; 20′, 2 mA). For the recording of HBR, electrical stimuli were delivered using a surface bipolar electrode placed on the median nerve at the wrist and EMG activity recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle bilaterally. Depending on the hand position respective to the face, HBR was assessed in four different conditions: “hand-far,” “hand-near” (eyes open), “side hand,” and “hand-patched” (eyes closed). While sham and cathodal cerebellar stimulation had no significant effect, anodal tcDCS dramatically dampened the magnitude of the HBR, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), in the “hand-patched” and “side hand” conditions only, for ipsilateral (F(4,171) = 15.08, P < 0.0001; F(4,171) = 8.95, P < 0.0001) as well as contralateral recordings (F(4,171) = 17.96, P < 0.0001); F4,171) = 5.35, P = 0.0004). Cerebellar polarization did not modify AUC in the “hand-far” and “hand-near” sessions. tDCS applied over the motor area did not affect HBR. These results seem to support a role of the cerebellum in the defensive responses within the peripersonal space surrounding the face, thus suggesting a possible cerebellar involvement in visual-independent defensive behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13471
JournalPhysiological Reports
Volume6
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Blinking
Hand
Cerebellum
Motor Cortex
Area Under Curve
Median Nerve
Wrist

Keywords

  • Cerebellar direct current stimulation
  • cerebellum
  • defensive behavior
  • hand blink reflex
  • peripersonal space
  • tDCS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates hand blink reflex : implications for defensive behavior in humans. / Bocci, Tommaso; Ferrucci, Roberta; Barloscio, Davide; Parenti, Laura; Cortese, Francesca; Priori, Alberto; Sartucci, Ferdinando.

In: Physiological Reports, Vol. 6, No. 10, e13471, 01.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bocci, Tommaso ; Ferrucci, Roberta ; Barloscio, Davide ; Parenti, Laura ; Cortese, Francesca ; Priori, Alberto ; Sartucci, Ferdinando. / Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates hand blink reflex : implications for defensive behavior in humans. In: Physiological Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 10.
@article{bb653bfb75924170bc6af963a5165011,
title = "Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates hand blink reflex: implications for defensive behavior in humans",
abstract = "The cerebellum is involved in a wide number of integrative functions. We evaluated the role of cerebellum in peripersonal defensive behavior, as assessed by the so-called hand blink reflex (HBR), modulating cerebellar activity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy subjects underwent cerebellar (sham, anodal, and cathodal tcDCS) and motor cortex tDCS (anodal or cathodal; 20′, 2 mA). For the recording of HBR, electrical stimuli were delivered using a surface bipolar electrode placed on the median nerve at the wrist and EMG activity recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle bilaterally. Depending on the hand position respective to the face, HBR was assessed in four different conditions: “hand-far,” “hand-near” (eyes open), “side hand,” and “hand-patched” (eyes closed). While sham and cathodal cerebellar stimulation had no significant effect, anodal tcDCS dramatically dampened the magnitude of the HBR, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), in the “hand-patched” and “side hand” conditions only, for ipsilateral (F(4,171) = 15.08, P < 0.0001; F(4,171) = 8.95, P < 0.0001) as well as contralateral recordings (F(4,171) = 17.96, P < 0.0001); F4,171) = 5.35, P = 0.0004). Cerebellar polarization did not modify AUC in the “hand-far” and “hand-near” sessions. tDCS applied over the motor area did not affect HBR. These results seem to support a role of the cerebellum in the defensive responses within the peripersonal space surrounding the face, thus suggesting a possible cerebellar involvement in visual-independent defensive behavior.",
keywords = "Cerebellar direct current stimulation, cerebellum, defensive behavior, hand blink reflex, peripersonal space, tDCS",
author = "Tommaso Bocci and Roberta Ferrucci and Davide Barloscio and Laura Parenti and Francesca Cortese and Alberto Priori and Ferdinando Sartucci",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14814/phy2.13471",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Physiological Reports",
issn = "2051-817X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates hand blink reflex

T2 - implications for defensive behavior in humans

AU - Bocci, Tommaso

AU - Ferrucci, Roberta

AU - Barloscio, Davide

AU - Parenti, Laura

AU - Cortese, Francesca

AU - Priori, Alberto

AU - Sartucci, Ferdinando

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - The cerebellum is involved in a wide number of integrative functions. We evaluated the role of cerebellum in peripersonal defensive behavior, as assessed by the so-called hand blink reflex (HBR), modulating cerebellar activity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy subjects underwent cerebellar (sham, anodal, and cathodal tcDCS) and motor cortex tDCS (anodal or cathodal; 20′, 2 mA). For the recording of HBR, electrical stimuli were delivered using a surface bipolar electrode placed on the median nerve at the wrist and EMG activity recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle bilaterally. Depending on the hand position respective to the face, HBR was assessed in four different conditions: “hand-far,” “hand-near” (eyes open), “side hand,” and “hand-patched” (eyes closed). While sham and cathodal cerebellar stimulation had no significant effect, anodal tcDCS dramatically dampened the magnitude of the HBR, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), in the “hand-patched” and “side hand” conditions only, for ipsilateral (F(4,171) = 15.08, P < 0.0001; F(4,171) = 8.95, P < 0.0001) as well as contralateral recordings (F(4,171) = 17.96, P < 0.0001); F4,171) = 5.35, P = 0.0004). Cerebellar polarization did not modify AUC in the “hand-far” and “hand-near” sessions. tDCS applied over the motor area did not affect HBR. These results seem to support a role of the cerebellum in the defensive responses within the peripersonal space surrounding the face, thus suggesting a possible cerebellar involvement in visual-independent defensive behavior.

AB - The cerebellum is involved in a wide number of integrative functions. We evaluated the role of cerebellum in peripersonal defensive behavior, as assessed by the so-called hand blink reflex (HBR), modulating cerebellar activity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy subjects underwent cerebellar (sham, anodal, and cathodal tcDCS) and motor cortex tDCS (anodal or cathodal; 20′, 2 mA). For the recording of HBR, electrical stimuli were delivered using a surface bipolar electrode placed on the median nerve at the wrist and EMG activity recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle bilaterally. Depending on the hand position respective to the face, HBR was assessed in four different conditions: “hand-far,” “hand-near” (eyes open), “side hand,” and “hand-patched” (eyes closed). While sham and cathodal cerebellar stimulation had no significant effect, anodal tcDCS dramatically dampened the magnitude of the HBR, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), in the “hand-patched” and “side hand” conditions only, for ipsilateral (F(4,171) = 15.08, P < 0.0001; F(4,171) = 8.95, P < 0.0001) as well as contralateral recordings (F(4,171) = 17.96, P < 0.0001); F4,171) = 5.35, P = 0.0004). Cerebellar polarization did not modify AUC in the “hand-far” and “hand-near” sessions. tDCS applied over the motor area did not affect HBR. These results seem to support a role of the cerebellum in the defensive responses within the peripersonal space surrounding the face, thus suggesting a possible cerebellar involvement in visual-independent defensive behavior.

KW - Cerebellar direct current stimulation

KW - cerebellum

KW - defensive behavior

KW - hand blink reflex

KW - peripersonal space

KW - tDCS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047567182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047567182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14814/phy2.13471

DO - 10.14814/phy2.13471

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047567182

VL - 6

JO - Physiological Reports

JF - Physiological Reports

SN - 2051-817X

IS - 10

M1 - e13471

ER -