Changes in operative strategy for patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection interventional cohort program

Neil Parikh, Santi Trimarchi, Thomas G. Gleason, Arnoud V. Kamman, Marco Di Eusanio, Truls Myrmel, Amit Korach, Hersh Maniar, Takeyoshi Ota, Ali Khoynezhad, Daniel G. Montgomery, Nimesh D. Desai, Kim A. Eagle, Christoph A. Nienaber, Eric M. Isselbacher, Joseph E. Bavaria, Thoralf M. Sundt, Himanshu J. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Advancements in cardiothoracic surgery prompted investigation into changes in operative management for acute type A aortic dissections over time. Methods: One thousand seven hundred thirty-two patients undergoing surgery for type A aortic dissection were identified from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Interventional Cohort Database. Patients were divided into time tertiles (T) (T1: 1996-2003, T2: 2004-2010, and T3: 2011-2016). Results: Frequency of valve sparing procures increased (T1: 3.9%, T2: 18.6%, and T3: 26.7%; trend P < .001). Biologic valves were increasingly utilized (T1: 35.6%, T2; 40.6%, and T3: 52.0%; trend P = .009), whereas mechanical valve use decreased (T1: 57.6%, T2: 58.0%, and T3: 45.4%; trend P = .027) for aortic valve replacement. Adjunctive cerebral perfusion use increased (T1: 67.1%, T2: 89.5%, and T3: 84.8%; trend P < .001), with increase in antegrade cerebral techniques (T1: 55.9%, T2: 58.8%, and T3: 66.1%; trend P = .005) and hypothermic circulatory arrest (T1: 80.1%, T2: 85.9%, and T3: 86.8%; trend P = .030). Arterial perfusion through axillary cannulation increased (T1: 18.0%, T2: 33.2%, and T3: 55.7%), whereas perfusion via a femoral approach diminished (T1: 76.0%, T2: 53.3%, and T3: 30.1%) (both P values < .001). Hemiarch replacement was utilized more frequently (T1: 27.0%, T2: 63.3%, and T3: 51.7%; trend P = .001) and partial arch was utilized less frequently (T1: 20.7%, T2: 12.0%, and T3: 8.4%; trend P < .001), whereas complete arch replacement was used similarly (P = .131). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased (T1: 17.5%, T2: 15.8%, and T3: 12.2%; trend P = .017). Conclusions: There have been significant changes in operative strategy over time in the management of type A aortic dissection, with more frequent use of valve-sparing procedures, bioprosthetic aortic valve substitutes, antegrade cerebral perfusion strategies, and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Most importantly, a significant decrease of in-hospital mortality was observed during the 20-year timespan.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - May 18 2016

Keywords

  • Aortic dissection
  • Operative strategy
  • Surgical management
  • Survival
  • Trends

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in operative strategy for patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection interventional cohort program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this