Characteristics and results of epicardial pacing in neonates and infants

E. Villain, H. Martelli, D. Bonnet, L. Iserin, G. Butera, J. Kachaner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The results of epicardial pacing in infants with isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) are reported. Thirty-four patients, aged 1 day to 20 months (22 patients <1 month), were paced between 1988 and 1998. Thirty had bradycardia <50 beats/min with symptoms in 12 patients, and 4 patients were paced because of associated ventricular ectopy or prolonged QT interval. In thirty cases, the electrodes were implanted through a left thoracotomy and connected to an abdominal generator; in four, the subxyphoid approach was preferred. Twenty-two children had dual chamber units. There was no operative death, but three patients died later of cardiomyopathy. Seven infants were reoperated for electrode displacement, infection, exit block, and pacemaker sensitivity. Chronic ventricular thresholds ranged from 0.3 to 2 V except in one case (4 V) and proper atrial sensing was lost in two cases. All children are doing well and the generator has lasted at least 5 years in 16 cases. In conclusion, epicardial pacing in infants with CAVB can be done with satisfactory results. There was no mortality in relation with pacing and thresholds have improved with the use of steroid-eluting electrodes. The deep location of the generator prevents cutaneous erosion and allows implantation of large units with a longer life duration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2052-2056
Number of pages5
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume23
Issue number12 I
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Congenital heart block
  • Epicardial pacing
  • Lead
  • Pacemaker
  • Pediatric pacing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics and results of epicardial pacing in neonates and infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this