Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS v.2018 scale by comparing it with the Likert scale, in the characterization of liver lesions. Methods: A total of 39 patients with chronic liver disease underwent MR examination for characterization of 44 liver lesions. Images were independently analyzed by two radiologists using the LI-RADS scale and by another two radiologists using the Likert scale. The reference standard used was either histopathological evaluation or a 4-year MRI follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. Results: The LI-RADS scale obtained an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%, while the Likert scale achieved an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 89% and a NPV of 70%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 85% for the LI-RADS scale and 83% for the Likert scale. The inter-observer agreement was strong (k = 0.89) between the LI-RADS evaluators and moderate (k = 0.69) between the Likert evaluators. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two scales; nevertheless, we suggest that the LI-RADS scale be used, as it appeared more objective and consistent.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Radiologia Medica |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - Jan 1 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Carcinoma, hepatocellular
- Data interpretation, statistical
- Early detection of cancer
- Liver cirrhosis
- Magnetic resonance imaging
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI : performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale. / Esposito, Andrea; Buscarino, Valentina; Raciti, Dario; Casiraghi, Elena; Manini, Matteo; Biondetti, Pietro; Forzenigo, Laura.
In: Radiologia Medica, 01.01.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI
T2 - performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale
AU - Esposito, Andrea
AU - Buscarino, Valentina
AU - Raciti, Dario
AU - Casiraghi, Elena
AU - Manini, Matteo
AU - Biondetti, Pietro
AU - Forzenigo, Laura
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS v.2018 scale by comparing it with the Likert scale, in the characterization of liver lesions. Methods: A total of 39 patients with chronic liver disease underwent MR examination for characterization of 44 liver lesions. Images were independently analyzed by two radiologists using the LI-RADS scale and by another two radiologists using the Likert scale. The reference standard used was either histopathological evaluation or a 4-year MRI follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. Results: The LI-RADS scale obtained an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%, while the Likert scale achieved an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 89% and a NPV of 70%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 85% for the LI-RADS scale and 83% for the Likert scale. The inter-observer agreement was strong (k = 0.89) between the LI-RADS evaluators and moderate (k = 0.69) between the Likert evaluators. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two scales; nevertheless, we suggest that the LI-RADS scale be used, as it appeared more objective and consistent.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS v.2018 scale by comparing it with the Likert scale, in the characterization of liver lesions. Methods: A total of 39 patients with chronic liver disease underwent MR examination for characterization of 44 liver lesions. Images were independently analyzed by two radiologists using the LI-RADS scale and by another two radiologists using the Likert scale. The reference standard used was either histopathological evaluation or a 4-year MRI follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. Results: The LI-RADS scale obtained an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%, while the Likert scale achieved an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 89% and a NPV of 70%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 85% for the LI-RADS scale and 83% for the Likert scale. The inter-observer agreement was strong (k = 0.89) between the LI-RADS evaluators and moderate (k = 0.69) between the Likert evaluators. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two scales; nevertheless, we suggest that the LI-RADS scale be used, as it appeared more objective and consistent.
KW - Carcinoma, hepatocellular
KW - Data interpretation, statistical
KW - Early detection of cancer
KW - Liver cirrhosis
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073959119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073959119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11547-019-01092-y
DO - 10.1007/s11547-019-01092-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073959119
JO - Radiologia Medica
JF - Radiologia Medica
SN - 0033-8362
ER -