TY - JOUR
T1 - Chatting while walking does not interfere with topographical working memory
AU - Piccardi, Laura
AU - Bocchi, Alessia
AU - Palmiero, Massimiliano
AU - Boccia, Maddalena
AU - D’amico, Simonetta
AU - Nori, Raffaella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferences on topographical working memory. We aimed to clarify both the role of language in navigational working memory per se and the extent to which spatial language interferes with the main task more than the other types of interference. Specifically, in the three experiments we investigated the differences due to different verbal interference sources (i.e., articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables; right and left, up and bottom; and north, south, east and west). The main hypothesis was that the use of spatial language affected more landmark-based topographical working memory than both the verbalization of nonsense syllables and other types of interference. Results show no effect of spatial language, only spatial environmental interference affected the navigational working memory performance. In general, this might depend on the scarce role of spatial language in online navigational working memory tasks. Specifically, language is more important for learning and retrieval of the cognitive map. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
AB - In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferences on topographical working memory. We aimed to clarify both the role of language in navigational working memory per se and the extent to which spatial language interferes with the main task more than the other types of interference. Specifically, in the three experiments we investigated the differences due to different verbal interference sources (i.e., articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables; right and left, up and bottom; and north, south, east and west). The main hypothesis was that the use of spatial language affected more landmark-based topographical working memory than both the verbalization of nonsense syllables and other types of interference. Results show no effect of spatial language, only spatial environmental interference affected the navigational working memory performance. In general, this might depend on the scarce role of spatial language in online navigational working memory tasks. Specifically, language is more important for learning and retrieval of the cognitive map. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
KW - Frame of reference
KW - Gender
KW - Interference
KW - Navigation
KW - Orientation
KW - Spatial
KW - Working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095813332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095813332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/brainsci10110811
DO - 10.3390/brainsci10110811
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85095813332
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Brain Sciences
JF - Brain Sciences
SN - 2076-3425
IS - 11
M1 - 811
ER -