Chlamydia pneumoniae serology

Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results

Rosanna W. Peeling, San Pin Wang, J. Thomas Grayston, Francesco Blasi, Jens Boman, Andreas Clad, Heike Freidank, Charlotte A. Gaydos, Judy Gnarpe, Toshikatsu Hagiwara, Robert B. Jones, Jeanne Orfila, Kenneth Persson, Mirja Puolakkainen, Pekka Saikku, Julius Schachter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lack of standardization in chlamydia serology has made interpretation of published data difficult. This study was initiated to determine the extent of interlaboratory variation of microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test results for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections. Identical panels of 22 sera were sent to 14 laboratories in eight countries for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by MIF. Although there was extensive variation in the numeric titer values, the overall percentage agreement with the reference standard titers from the University of Washington was 80%. For results by serodiagnostic category, the best agreement was for four-fold rise in IgG titers, while the lowest agreement was for negative or low IgG titers. Agreement for IgM titers was 50%-95%. Four laboratories failed to discern false-positive IgM titers possibly because of the presence of rheumatoid factor. Further studies are underway to determine the source of interlaboratory variation for the MIF test.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Infectious Diseases
Volume181
Issue number6 SUPPL. 3
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Chlamydophila pneumoniae
Serology
Immunoglobulin M
Immunoglobulin G
Chlamydia Infections
Chlamydia
Rheumatoid Factor
Serologic Tests
Antibodies
Serum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Immunology

Cite this

Peeling, R. W., Wang, S. P., Grayston, J. T., Blasi, F., Boman, J., Clad, A., ... Schachter, J. (2000). Chlamydia pneumoniae serology: Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 181(6 SUPPL. 3).

Chlamydia pneumoniae serology : Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results. / Peeling, Rosanna W.; Wang, San Pin; Grayston, J. Thomas; Blasi, Francesco; Boman, Jens; Clad, Andreas; Freidank, Heike; Gaydos, Charlotte A.; Gnarpe, Judy; Hagiwara, Toshikatsu; Jones, Robert B.; Orfila, Jeanne; Persson, Kenneth; Puolakkainen, Mirja; Saikku, Pekka; Schachter, Julius.

In: Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 181, No. 6 SUPPL. 3, 2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peeling, RW, Wang, SP, Grayston, JT, Blasi, F, Boman, J, Clad, A, Freidank, H, Gaydos, CA, Gnarpe, J, Hagiwara, T, Jones, RB, Orfila, J, Persson, K, Puolakkainen, M, Saikku, P & Schachter, J 2000, 'Chlamydia pneumoniae serology: Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results', Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 181, no. 6 SUPPL. 3.
Peeling, Rosanna W. ; Wang, San Pin ; Grayston, J. Thomas ; Blasi, Francesco ; Boman, Jens ; Clad, Andreas ; Freidank, Heike ; Gaydos, Charlotte A. ; Gnarpe, Judy ; Hagiwara, Toshikatsu ; Jones, Robert B. ; Orfila, Jeanne ; Persson, Kenneth ; Puolakkainen, Mirja ; Saikku, Pekka ; Schachter, Julius. / Chlamydia pneumoniae serology : Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results. In: Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2000 ; Vol. 181, No. 6 SUPPL. 3.
@article{307ef7ea82d9437cb66038ff0f239776,
title = "Chlamydia pneumoniae serology: Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results",
abstract = "The lack of standardization in chlamydia serology has made interpretation of published data difficult. This study was initiated to determine the extent of interlaboratory variation of microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test results for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections. Identical panels of 22 sera were sent to 14 laboratories in eight countries for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by MIF. Although there was extensive variation in the numeric titer values, the overall percentage agreement with the reference standard titers from the University of Washington was 80{\%}. For results by serodiagnostic category, the best agreement was for four-fold rise in IgG titers, while the lowest agreement was for negative or low IgG titers. Agreement for IgM titers was 50{\%}-95{\%}. Four laboratories failed to discern false-positive IgM titers possibly because of the presence of rheumatoid factor. Further studies are underway to determine the source of interlaboratory variation for the MIF test.",
author = "Peeling, {Rosanna W.} and Wang, {San Pin} and Grayston, {J. Thomas} and Francesco Blasi and Jens Boman and Andreas Clad and Heike Freidank and Gaydos, {Charlotte A.} and Judy Gnarpe and Toshikatsu Hagiwara and Jones, {Robert B.} and Jeanne Orfila and Kenneth Persson and Mirja Puolakkainen and Pekka Saikku and Julius Schachter",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "181",
journal = "Journal of Infectious Diseases",
issn = "0022-1899",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6 SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chlamydia pneumoniae serology

T2 - Interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results

AU - Peeling, Rosanna W.

AU - Wang, San Pin

AU - Grayston, J. Thomas

AU - Blasi, Francesco

AU - Boman, Jens

AU - Clad, Andreas

AU - Freidank, Heike

AU - Gaydos, Charlotte A.

AU - Gnarpe, Judy

AU - Hagiwara, Toshikatsu

AU - Jones, Robert B.

AU - Orfila, Jeanne

AU - Persson, Kenneth

AU - Puolakkainen, Mirja

AU - Saikku, Pekka

AU - Schachter, Julius

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The lack of standardization in chlamydia serology has made interpretation of published data difficult. This study was initiated to determine the extent of interlaboratory variation of microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test results for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections. Identical panels of 22 sera were sent to 14 laboratories in eight countries for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by MIF. Although there was extensive variation in the numeric titer values, the overall percentage agreement with the reference standard titers from the University of Washington was 80%. For results by serodiagnostic category, the best agreement was for four-fold rise in IgG titers, while the lowest agreement was for negative or low IgG titers. Agreement for IgM titers was 50%-95%. Four laboratories failed to discern false-positive IgM titers possibly because of the presence of rheumatoid factor. Further studies are underway to determine the source of interlaboratory variation for the MIF test.

AB - The lack of standardization in chlamydia serology has made interpretation of published data difficult. This study was initiated to determine the extent of interlaboratory variation of microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test results for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections. Identical panels of 22 sera were sent to 14 laboratories in eight countries for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by MIF. Although there was extensive variation in the numeric titer values, the overall percentage agreement with the reference standard titers from the University of Washington was 80%. For results by serodiagnostic category, the best agreement was for four-fold rise in IgG titers, while the lowest agreement was for negative or low IgG titers. Agreement for IgM titers was 50%-95%. Four laboratories failed to discern false-positive IgM titers possibly because of the presence of rheumatoid factor. Further studies are underway to determine the source of interlaboratory variation for the MIF test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034100062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034100062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 181

JO - Journal of Infectious Diseases

JF - Journal of Infectious Diseases

SN - 0022-1899

IS - 6 SUPPL. 3

ER -