Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review

Jacopo Antonino Vitale, Andi Weydahl

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated. Objective: The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity. Methods: The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords “chronotype”, “circadian typology”, “morningness”, and “eveningness” in combination with each of the words “sport”, “performance”, and “athletic.” Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015. Results: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies. Conclusions: Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1859-1868
Number of pages10
JournalSports Medicine
Volume47
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Athletic Performance
Exercise
Sports
Periodicity
Circadian Rhythm
PubMed
Fatigue
Meta-Analysis
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance : A Systematic Review. / Vitale, Jacopo Antonino; Weydahl, Andi.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 1859-1868.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Vitale, Jacopo Antonino ; Weydahl, Andi. / Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance : A Systematic Review. In: Sports Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 47, No. 9. pp. 1859-1868.
@article{7e32907ffe2148989faad605f291b5d8,
title = "Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Background: Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated. Objective: The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity. Methods: The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords “chronotype”, “circadian typology”, “morningness”, and “eveningness” in combination with each of the words “sport”, “performance”, and “athletic.” Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015. Results: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies. Conclusions: Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.",
author = "Vitale, {Jacopo Antonino} and Andi Weydahl",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1859--1868",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Vitale, Jacopo Antonino

AU - Weydahl, Andi

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Background: Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated. Objective: The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity. Methods: The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords “chronotype”, “circadian typology”, “morningness”, and “eveningness” in combination with each of the words “sport”, “performance”, and “athletic.” Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015. Results: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies. Conclusions: Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.

AB - Background: Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated. Objective: The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity. Methods: The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords “chronotype”, “circadian typology”, “morningness”, and “eveningness” in combination with each of the words “sport”, “performance”, and “athletic.” Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015. Results: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies. Conclusions: Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019054197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019054197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z

DO - 10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85019054197

VL - 47

SP - 1859

EP - 1868

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 9

ER -