Clinical assessment of a nasal decongestion test by visual analog scale in allergic rhinitis

Giorgio Ciprandi, Catherine Klersy, Franco Ameli, Ignazio Cirillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Nasal airflow, as measured by rhinomanometry, is frequently impaired in allergic rhinitis (AR). The decongestion test evaluates whether the application of an intranasal vasoconstrictor drug increases nasal airflow. That allergy is characterized by inflammation and that the response to the decongestion test correlates with the grade of inflammatory reaction has previously been shown. The aim of this study was to verify the suitability of the use of the visual analog scales (VASs) as a surrogate for rhinomanometry in the decongestion test assessment in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. Methods: One hundred three patients (mean age, 23 years [2.24 SD]) were studied. Nasal symptoms, VAS, rhinomanometry, and nasal decongestion test were assessed in all patients. Results: A significant association was observed between VAS and nasal airflow after the decongestion test (Spearman R = -33.3%; p <0.001). Moreover, a significant inverse association between changes in decongestion measures was detected, with a Spearman R = -64.7% (p <0.001). The associated sensitivity was of 92.5%, and the specificity for this test was 60.0%. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81. Conclusion: The use of VAS for assessing the decongestion test appears clinically relevant in that it allows, with a fair degree of reliability, such a test to be performed in the absence of rhinomanometry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-505
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Rhinomanometry
Visual Analog Scale
Nose
Vasoconstrictor Agents
ROC Curve
Hypersensitivity
Allergic Rhinitis
Inflammation

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Decongestion test
  • Inflammation
  • Persistent rhinitis
  • Rhinitis
  • Rhinomanometry
  • Visual analog scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Clinical assessment of a nasal decongestion test by visual analog scale in allergic rhinitis. / Ciprandi, Giorgio; Klersy, Catherine; Ameli, Franco; Cirillo, Ignazio.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 22, No. 5, 09.2008, p. 502-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ciprandi, Giorgio ; Klersy, Catherine ; Ameli, Franco ; Cirillo, Ignazio. / Clinical assessment of a nasal decongestion test by visual analog scale in allergic rhinitis. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 502-505.
@article{2d92a251e1fb43a9a6f9df35d4722853,
title = "Clinical assessment of a nasal decongestion test by visual analog scale in allergic rhinitis",
abstract = "Background: Nasal airflow, as measured by rhinomanometry, is frequently impaired in allergic rhinitis (AR). The decongestion test evaluates whether the application of an intranasal vasoconstrictor drug increases nasal airflow. That allergy is characterized by inflammation and that the response to the decongestion test correlates with the grade of inflammatory reaction has previously been shown. The aim of this study was to verify the suitability of the use of the visual analog scales (VASs) as a surrogate for rhinomanometry in the decongestion test assessment in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. Methods: One hundred three patients (mean age, 23 years [2.24 SD]) were studied. Nasal symptoms, VAS, rhinomanometry, and nasal decongestion test were assessed in all patients. Results: A significant association was observed between VAS and nasal airflow after the decongestion test (Spearman R = -33.3{\%}; p <0.001). Moreover, a significant inverse association between changes in decongestion measures was detected, with a Spearman R = -64.7{\%} (p <0.001). The associated sensitivity was of 92.5{\%}, and the specificity for this test was 60.0{\%}. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81. Conclusion: The use of VAS for assessing the decongestion test appears clinically relevant in that it allows, with a fair degree of reliability, such a test to be performed in the absence of rhinomanometry.",
keywords = "Allergy, Decongestion test, Inflammation, Persistent rhinitis, Rhinitis, Rhinomanometry, Visual analog scale",
author = "Giorgio Ciprandi and Catherine Klersy and Franco Ameli and Ignazio Cirillo",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3214",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "502--505",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology",
issn = "1050-6586",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical assessment of a nasal decongestion test by visual analog scale in allergic rhinitis

AU - Ciprandi, Giorgio

AU - Klersy, Catherine

AU - Ameli, Franco

AU - Cirillo, Ignazio

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Background: Nasal airflow, as measured by rhinomanometry, is frequently impaired in allergic rhinitis (AR). The decongestion test evaluates whether the application of an intranasal vasoconstrictor drug increases nasal airflow. That allergy is characterized by inflammation and that the response to the decongestion test correlates with the grade of inflammatory reaction has previously been shown. The aim of this study was to verify the suitability of the use of the visual analog scales (VASs) as a surrogate for rhinomanometry in the decongestion test assessment in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. Methods: One hundred three patients (mean age, 23 years [2.24 SD]) were studied. Nasal symptoms, VAS, rhinomanometry, and nasal decongestion test were assessed in all patients. Results: A significant association was observed between VAS and nasal airflow after the decongestion test (Spearman R = -33.3%; p <0.001). Moreover, a significant inverse association between changes in decongestion measures was detected, with a Spearman R = -64.7% (p <0.001). The associated sensitivity was of 92.5%, and the specificity for this test was 60.0%. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81. Conclusion: The use of VAS for assessing the decongestion test appears clinically relevant in that it allows, with a fair degree of reliability, such a test to be performed in the absence of rhinomanometry.

AB - Background: Nasal airflow, as measured by rhinomanometry, is frequently impaired in allergic rhinitis (AR). The decongestion test evaluates whether the application of an intranasal vasoconstrictor drug increases nasal airflow. That allergy is characterized by inflammation and that the response to the decongestion test correlates with the grade of inflammatory reaction has previously been shown. The aim of this study was to verify the suitability of the use of the visual analog scales (VASs) as a surrogate for rhinomanometry in the decongestion test assessment in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. Methods: One hundred three patients (mean age, 23 years [2.24 SD]) were studied. Nasal symptoms, VAS, rhinomanometry, and nasal decongestion test were assessed in all patients. Results: A significant association was observed between VAS and nasal airflow after the decongestion test (Spearman R = -33.3%; p <0.001). Moreover, a significant inverse association between changes in decongestion measures was detected, with a Spearman R = -64.7% (p <0.001). The associated sensitivity was of 92.5%, and the specificity for this test was 60.0%. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81. Conclusion: The use of VAS for assessing the decongestion test appears clinically relevant in that it allows, with a fair degree of reliability, such a test to be performed in the absence of rhinomanometry.

KW - Allergy

KW - Decongestion test

KW - Inflammation

KW - Persistent rhinitis

KW - Rhinitis

KW - Rhinomanometry

KW - Visual analog scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53549084328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53549084328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3214

DO - 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3214

M3 - Article

C2 - 18954509

AN - SCOPUS:53549084328

VL - 22

SP - 502

EP - 505

JO - American Journal of Rhinology

JF - American Journal of Rhinology

SN - 1050-6586

IS - 5

ER -