Clinical investigation of cognitive styles in patients with acquired brain damage

Serena Oliveri, Chiara Incorpora, Marina Genevini, Laura Santagostino, Laura Tettamanti, Alessandro Antonietti, Annalisa Risoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study aims to investigate relationships between the preference in use of visual-verbal cognitive representation and strategies and lesion site in patients with acquired brain injury. The Visualiser-Verbaliser Questionnaire (VVQ) and the Questionnaire on Visual and Verbal Strategies (QSVV) were administered to 48 patients by an examiner in an ambulatory setting. Data showed that the preference for verbalisation decreased in patients with a parietal focal lesion, who tended to use a mixed cognitive style. Patients with subcortical bilateral lesions verbalised more than patients with no lesion or right focal lesions. In general, damage in a specific area associated to a type of cognitive strategy may compromise its use, but does not lead to its extinction. From a neurorehabilitation perspective, findings suggest that patients can learn to use cognitive strategies to compensate for their deficits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-373
Number of pages12
JournalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2012

Keywords

  • Brain lesion
  • Cognitive deficit
  • Cognitive style
  • Verbaliser
  • Visualiser

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical investigation of cognitive styles in patients with acquired brain damage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Oliveri, S., Incorpora, C., Genevini, M., Santagostino, L., Tettamanti, L., Antonietti, A., & Risoli, A. (2012). Clinical investigation of cognitive styles in patients with acquired brain damage. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22(3), 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2011.647416