Clinical outcomes following protected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

Alfonso Ielasi, Azeem Latib, Cosmo Godino, Andrew S P Sharp, Rasha Al Lamee, Matteo Montorfano, Flavio Airoldi, Mauro Carlino, Alaide Chieffo, Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi, Antonio Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with routine use of a cerebral embolic protection device (EPD). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 490 consecutive patients (365 men; mean age 70.7±8.5 years) who underwent CAS with EPD between January 1999 and December 2007 at 2 institutions with large referral practices. There were 163 symptomatic patients with stenosis ≥50% and 327 asymptomatic patients with ≥80% diameter stenosis treated in 536 CAS procedures. Nearly a quarter (116, 23.7%) of the cohort had diabetes. High-risk surgical features were present in 141 (28.8%): 73 (14.9%) aged ≥80 years, 25 (5.1%) with significant heart disease, 23 (4.6%) with postsurgical restenosis, and 16 (3.2%) with contralateral carotid occlusion. An EPD was successfully placed in 512 (95.5%) patients. Results: The incidence of any stroke within 30 days was 3.3% (16/490), of which the majority (13, 2.6%) were ipsilateral [5 (1.0%) major and 8 (1.6%) minor]. The incidence of major adverse events (MAE), i.e., any stroke, death or myocardial infarction, within 30 days was 3.7% (18/490); the incidence of 30-day any stroke/death was 3.7% (18/490), while the cumulative incidence of any stroke/death at 1 year was 6.1% (30/490). In symptomatic patients, the 30-day MAE rate was 6.7% (11/163) versus 2.1% (7/237) in the asymptomatic group (p=0.02). A subgroup analysis based on surgical risk showed that the 30-day MAE rate was similar between high-risk and non-high-risk patients [4.9% (7/144) versus 3.2% (11/346); p=0.5]. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort, CAS with routine use of EPDs was technically feasible, clinically safe, and associated with a low rate of periprocedural and 1-year events; results were similar irrespective of surgical risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-307
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Endovascular Therapy
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010


  • Angioplasty
  • Carotid artery
  • Embolic protection device
  • Filter
  • Outcome analysis
  • Stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes following protected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this