Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: A systematic review

Stefano Vercelli, Giorgio Ferriero, Francesco Sartorio, Carlo Cisari, Elisabetta Bravini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review and critically assess the most used and clinimetrically sound outcome measures currently available for postsurgical scar assessment in rehabilitation. We performed a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases to June 2015. All published peer-reviewed studies referring to the development, validation, or clinical use of scales or questionnaires in patients with linear scars were screened. Of 922 articles initially identified in the literature search, 48 full-text articles were retrieved for assessment. Of these, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for data collection. Data were collected pertaining to instrument item domains, validity, reliability, and Rasch analysis. The eight outcome measures identified were as follows: Vancouver Scar Scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Manchester Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Bock Quality of Life (Bock QoL) questionnaire, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure, and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Scales were examined for their clinimetric properties, and recommendations for their clinical or research use and selection were made. There is currently no absolute gold standard to be used in rehabilitation for the assessment of postsurgical scars, although the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and the Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure emerged as the most robust scales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-286
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 3 2015

Fingerprint

Cicatrix
Rehabilitation
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Dermatology
Reproducibility of Results
Databases

Keywords

  • Cicatrix
  • Evaluation
  • Outcome assessment
  • Quality of life
  • Wound healing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{25b1e6b00cc64890b6bc3ee4eadbaf5b,
title = "Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: A systematic review",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to review and critically assess the most used and clinimetrically sound outcome measures currently available for postsurgical scar assessment in rehabilitation. We performed a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases to June 2015. All published peer-reviewed studies referring to the development, validation, or clinical use of scales or questionnaires in patients with linear scars were screened. Of 922 articles initially identified in the literature search, 48 full-text articles were retrieved for assessment. Of these, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for data collection. Data were collected pertaining to instrument item domains, validity, reliability, and Rasch analysis. The eight outcome measures identified were as follows: Vancouver Scar Scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Manchester Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Bock Quality of Life (Bock QoL) questionnaire, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure, and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Scales were examined for their clinimetric properties, and recommendations for their clinical or research use and selection were made. There is currently no absolute gold standard to be used in rehabilitation for the assessment of postsurgical scars, although the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and the Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure emerged as the most robust scales.",
keywords = "Cicatrix, Evaluation, Outcome assessment, Quality of life, Wound healing",
author = "Stefano Vercelli and Giorgio Ferriero and Francesco Sartorio and Carlo Cisari and Elisabetta Bravini",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "279--286",
journal = "International Journal of Rehabilitation Research",
issn = "0342-5282",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Vercelli, Stefano

AU - Ferriero, Giorgio

AU - Sartorio, Francesco

AU - Cisari, Carlo

AU - Bravini, Elisabetta

PY - 2015/11/3

Y1 - 2015/11/3

N2 - The aim of this study was to review and critically assess the most used and clinimetrically sound outcome measures currently available for postsurgical scar assessment in rehabilitation. We performed a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases to June 2015. All published peer-reviewed studies referring to the development, validation, or clinical use of scales or questionnaires in patients with linear scars were screened. Of 922 articles initially identified in the literature search, 48 full-text articles were retrieved for assessment. Of these, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for data collection. Data were collected pertaining to instrument item domains, validity, reliability, and Rasch analysis. The eight outcome measures identified were as follows: Vancouver Scar Scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Manchester Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Bock Quality of Life (Bock QoL) questionnaire, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure, and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Scales were examined for their clinimetric properties, and recommendations for their clinical or research use and selection were made. There is currently no absolute gold standard to be used in rehabilitation for the assessment of postsurgical scars, although the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and the Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure emerged as the most robust scales.

AB - The aim of this study was to review and critically assess the most used and clinimetrically sound outcome measures currently available for postsurgical scar assessment in rehabilitation. We performed a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases to June 2015. All published peer-reviewed studies referring to the development, validation, or clinical use of scales or questionnaires in patients with linear scars were screened. Of 922 articles initially identified in the literature search, 48 full-text articles were retrieved for assessment. Of these, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for data collection. Data were collected pertaining to instrument item domains, validity, reliability, and Rasch analysis. The eight outcome measures identified were as follows: Vancouver Scar Scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Manchester Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Bock Quality of Life (Bock QoL) questionnaire, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure, and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Scales were examined for their clinimetric properties, and recommendations for their clinical or research use and selection were made. There is currently no absolute gold standard to be used in rehabilitation for the assessment of postsurgical scars, although the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and the Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure emerged as the most robust scales.

KW - Cicatrix

KW - Evaluation

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Quality of life

KW - Wound healing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947043748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947043748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134

DO - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134

M3 - Article

C2 - 26426285

AN - SCOPUS:84947043748

VL - 38

SP - 279

EP - 286

JO - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

JF - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

SN - 0342-5282

IS - 4

ER -