Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study

H. Gogas, B. Dréno, J. Larkin, L. Demidov, D. Stroyakovskiy, Z. Eroglu, P. Francesco Ferrucci, J. Pigozzo, P. Rutkowski, J. Mackiewicz, I. Rooney, A. Voulgari, S. Troutman, B. Pitcher, Y. Guo, Y. Yan, M. Castro, S. Mulla, K. Flaherty, A. Arance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggest that the combination of MEK inhibitors and immunotherapeutic agents may result in improved efficacy in melanoma. We evaluated whether combining MEK inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition was more efficacious than immune checkpoint inhibition alone in patients with previously untreated BRAFV600 wild-type advanced melanoma. Patients and methods: IMspire170 was an international, randomized, open-label, phase III study. Patients were randomized 1: 1 to receive cobimetinib (60 mg, days 1-21) plus anti-programmed death-ligand 1 atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks) in 28-day cycles or anti-programmed death-1 pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) alone until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. Results: Between 11 December 2017, and 29 January 2019, 446 patients were randomized to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (n = 222) or pembrolizumab (n = 224). Median follow-up was 7.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8-9.9] for cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 7.2 months (IQR 4.9-10.1) for pembrolizumab. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-7.2] with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 5.7 months (95% CI 3.7-9.6) with pembrolizumab [stratified hazard ratio 1.15 (95% CI 0.88-1.50); P = 0.30]. Hazard ratios for PFS were consistent across prespecified subgroups. In exploratory biomarker analyses, higher tumor mutational burden was associated with improved clinical outcomes in both treatment arms. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10.0% with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 0.9% with pembrolizumab), diarrhea (7.7% versus 1.9%), rash (6.8% versus 0.9%), hypertension (6.4% versus 3.7%), and dermatitis acneiform (5.0% versus 0). Serious AEs occurred in 44.1% of patients with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 20.8% with pembrolizumab. Conclusion: Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab did not improve PFS compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with BRAFV600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-394
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Dec 10 2020

Keywords

  • atezolizumab
  • BRAF wild-type
  • cobimetinib
  • melanoma
  • pembrolizumab

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAF<sup>V600</sup> wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this