Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

Micaela Mitolo, Annalena Venneri, Iain D. Wilkinson, Basil Sharrack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment is a common clinical feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) at both the earlier and later stages of the disease, and has a significant impact on patients' functional status and quality of life. The need to address this deficit should be taken into account in clinical practice and research studies. Objective To conduct an updated systematic review of all published studies of cognitive rehabilitation interventions in people with MS, including studies with methodological shortcomings, to highlight major strengths and weaknesses in the field and to provide directions for future research. Search methods We searched electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) for articles published in English up until January 2014. The reference lists of all identified articles were also searched to complete the initial list of references. Data extraction Articles were categorized into outcome measures: cognition, imaging, mood, fatigue, quality of life and self-perceived cognitive deficits. All articles were reviewed independently and assessed according to predetermined criteria. Results A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria of which 4 were of Level II-1 and none was Level I. Although the majority of these studies reported some improvements in cognitive abilities (N = 31), the evidence which has been reported in the literature remains inconclusive and no definite conclusions can be drawn about the effect of different types of interventions on cognitive rehabilitation outcomes (recommendation C). Conclusions This review identified conflicting findings in the published literature about the effectiveness of various forms of cognitive rehabilitation techniques used in patients with MS. Studies with more rigorous methodology are therefore needed to clarify which form of cognitive rehabilitation may lead to greater clinical improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13788
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume354
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 15 2015

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Rehabilitation
Quality of Life
Aptitude
PubMed
Cognition
Fatigue
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Research
Cognitive Dysfunction
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Cognitive rehabilitation
  • fMRI
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Quality of life
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis : A systematic review. / Mitolo, Micaela; Venneri, Annalena; Wilkinson, Iain D.; Sharrack, Basil.

In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Vol. 354, No. 1-2, 13788, 15.07.2015, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitolo, M, Venneri, A, Wilkinson, ID & Sharrack, B 2015, 'Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review', Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 354, no. 1-2, 13788, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.004
Mitolo, Micaela ; Venneri, Annalena ; Wilkinson, Iain D. ; Sharrack, Basil. / Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis : A systematic review. In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2015 ; Vol. 354, No. 1-2. pp. 1-9.
@article{6426709b27ef4b0fa578fb6cfdc05156,
title = "Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review",
abstract = "Abstract Background Cognitive impairment is a common clinical feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) at both the earlier and later stages of the disease, and has a significant impact on patients' functional status and quality of life. The need to address this deficit should be taken into account in clinical practice and research studies. Objective To conduct an updated systematic review of all published studies of cognitive rehabilitation interventions in people with MS, including studies with methodological shortcomings, to highlight major strengths and weaknesses in the field and to provide directions for future research. Search methods We searched electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) for articles published in English up until January 2014. The reference lists of all identified articles were also searched to complete the initial list of references. Data extraction Articles were categorized into outcome measures: cognition, imaging, mood, fatigue, quality of life and self-perceived cognitive deficits. All articles were reviewed independently and assessed according to predetermined criteria. Results A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria of which 4 were of Level II-1 and none was Level I. Although the majority of these studies reported some improvements in cognitive abilities (N = 31), the evidence which has been reported in the literature remains inconclusive and no definite conclusions can be drawn about the effect of different types of interventions on cognitive rehabilitation outcomes (recommendation C). Conclusions This review identified conflicting findings in the published literature about the effectiveness of various forms of cognitive rehabilitation techniques used in patients with MS. Studies with more rigorous methodology are therefore needed to clarify which form of cognitive rehabilitation may lead to greater clinical improvement.",
keywords = "Attention, Cognitive rehabilitation, fMRI, Multiple sclerosis, Quality of life, Working memory",
author = "Micaela Mitolo and Annalena Venneri and Wilkinson, {Iain D.} and Basil Sharrack",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.004",
language = "English",
volume = "354",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of the Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Mitolo, Micaela

AU - Venneri, Annalena

AU - Wilkinson, Iain D.

AU - Sharrack, Basil

PY - 2015/7/15

Y1 - 2015/7/15

N2 - Abstract Background Cognitive impairment is a common clinical feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) at both the earlier and later stages of the disease, and has a significant impact on patients' functional status and quality of life. The need to address this deficit should be taken into account in clinical practice and research studies. Objective To conduct an updated systematic review of all published studies of cognitive rehabilitation interventions in people with MS, including studies with methodological shortcomings, to highlight major strengths and weaknesses in the field and to provide directions for future research. Search methods We searched electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) for articles published in English up until January 2014. The reference lists of all identified articles were also searched to complete the initial list of references. Data extraction Articles were categorized into outcome measures: cognition, imaging, mood, fatigue, quality of life and self-perceived cognitive deficits. All articles were reviewed independently and assessed according to predetermined criteria. Results A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria of which 4 were of Level II-1 and none was Level I. Although the majority of these studies reported some improvements in cognitive abilities (N = 31), the evidence which has been reported in the literature remains inconclusive and no definite conclusions can be drawn about the effect of different types of interventions on cognitive rehabilitation outcomes (recommendation C). Conclusions This review identified conflicting findings in the published literature about the effectiveness of various forms of cognitive rehabilitation techniques used in patients with MS. Studies with more rigorous methodology are therefore needed to clarify which form of cognitive rehabilitation may lead to greater clinical improvement.

AB - Abstract Background Cognitive impairment is a common clinical feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) at both the earlier and later stages of the disease, and has a significant impact on patients' functional status and quality of life. The need to address this deficit should be taken into account in clinical practice and research studies. Objective To conduct an updated systematic review of all published studies of cognitive rehabilitation interventions in people with MS, including studies with methodological shortcomings, to highlight major strengths and weaknesses in the field and to provide directions for future research. Search methods We searched electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) for articles published in English up until January 2014. The reference lists of all identified articles were also searched to complete the initial list of references. Data extraction Articles were categorized into outcome measures: cognition, imaging, mood, fatigue, quality of life and self-perceived cognitive deficits. All articles were reviewed independently and assessed according to predetermined criteria. Results A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria of which 4 were of Level II-1 and none was Level I. Although the majority of these studies reported some improvements in cognitive abilities (N = 31), the evidence which has been reported in the literature remains inconclusive and no definite conclusions can be drawn about the effect of different types of interventions on cognitive rehabilitation outcomes (recommendation C). Conclusions This review identified conflicting findings in the published literature about the effectiveness of various forms of cognitive rehabilitation techniques used in patients with MS. Studies with more rigorous methodology are therefore needed to clarify which form of cognitive rehabilitation may lead to greater clinical improvement.

KW - Attention

KW - Cognitive rehabilitation

KW - fMRI

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Quality of life

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937524048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937524048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 25998261

AN - SCOPUS:84937524048

VL - 354

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

SN - 0022-510X

IS - 1-2

M1 - 13788

ER -