Cognitive style modulates semantic interference effects: evidence from field dependency

Raffaele Nappo, Cristina Romani, Giulia De Angelis, Gaspare Galati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The so-called semantic interference effect is a delay in selecting an appropriate target word in a context where semantic neighbours are strongly activated. Semantic interference effect has been described to vary from one individual to another. These differences in the susceptibility to semantic interference may be due to either differences in the ability to engage in lexical-specific selection mechanisms or to differences in the ability to engage more general, top-down inhibition mechanisms which suppress unwanted responses based on task-demands. However, semantic interference may also be modulated by an individual’s disposition to separate relevant perceptual signals from noise, such as a field-independent (FI) or a field-dependent (FD) cognitive style. We investigated the relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and in an STM probe task and both the ability to inhibit responses top-down (measured through a Stroop task) and a FI/FD cognitive style measured through the embedded figures test (EFT). We found a significant relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and cognitive style—with semantic interference increasing as a function of the degree of field dependence—but no associations with the semantic probe and the Stroop task. Our results suggest that semantic interference can be modulated by cognitive style, but not by differences in the ability to engage top-down control mechanisms, at least as measured by the Stroop task.

Original languageEnglish
JournalExperimental Brain Research
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2018

Fingerprint

Semantics

Keywords

  • Cognitive styles
  • Field dependence
  • Lexical retrieval
  • Semantic interference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Cognitive style modulates semantic interference effects : evidence from field dependency. / Nappo, Raffaele; Romani, Cristina; De Angelis, Giulia; Galati, Gaspare.

In: Experimental Brain Research, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6941a2d126014acea1c4c69dad46cb77,
title = "Cognitive style modulates semantic interference effects: evidence from field dependency",
abstract = "The so-called semantic interference effect is a delay in selecting an appropriate target word in a context where semantic neighbours are strongly activated. Semantic interference effect has been described to vary from one individual to another. These differences in the susceptibility to semantic interference may be due to either differences in the ability to engage in lexical-specific selection mechanisms or to differences in the ability to engage more general, top-down inhibition mechanisms which suppress unwanted responses based on task-demands. However, semantic interference may also be modulated by an individual’s disposition to separate relevant perceptual signals from noise, such as a field-independent (FI) or a field-dependent (FD) cognitive style. We investigated the relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and in an STM probe task and both the ability to inhibit responses top-down (measured through a Stroop task) and a FI/FD cognitive style measured through the embedded figures test (EFT). We found a significant relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and cognitive style—with semantic interference increasing as a function of the degree of field dependence—but no associations with the semantic probe and the Stroop task. Our results suggest that semantic interference can be modulated by cognitive style, but not by differences in the ability to engage top-down control mechanisms, at least as measured by the Stroop task.",
keywords = "Cognitive styles, Field dependence, Lexical retrieval, Semantic interference",
author = "Raffaele Nappo and Cristina Romani and {De Angelis}, Giulia and Gaspare Galati",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-018-5457-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive style modulates semantic interference effects

T2 - evidence from field dependency

AU - Nappo, Raffaele

AU - Romani, Cristina

AU - De Angelis, Giulia

AU - Galati, Gaspare

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The so-called semantic interference effect is a delay in selecting an appropriate target word in a context where semantic neighbours are strongly activated. Semantic interference effect has been described to vary from one individual to another. These differences in the susceptibility to semantic interference may be due to either differences in the ability to engage in lexical-specific selection mechanisms or to differences in the ability to engage more general, top-down inhibition mechanisms which suppress unwanted responses based on task-demands. However, semantic interference may also be modulated by an individual’s disposition to separate relevant perceptual signals from noise, such as a field-independent (FI) or a field-dependent (FD) cognitive style. We investigated the relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and in an STM probe task and both the ability to inhibit responses top-down (measured through a Stroop task) and a FI/FD cognitive style measured through the embedded figures test (EFT). We found a significant relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and cognitive style—with semantic interference increasing as a function of the degree of field dependence—but no associations with the semantic probe and the Stroop task. Our results suggest that semantic interference can be modulated by cognitive style, but not by differences in the ability to engage top-down control mechanisms, at least as measured by the Stroop task.

AB - The so-called semantic interference effect is a delay in selecting an appropriate target word in a context where semantic neighbours are strongly activated. Semantic interference effect has been described to vary from one individual to another. These differences in the susceptibility to semantic interference may be due to either differences in the ability to engage in lexical-specific selection mechanisms or to differences in the ability to engage more general, top-down inhibition mechanisms which suppress unwanted responses based on task-demands. However, semantic interference may also be modulated by an individual’s disposition to separate relevant perceptual signals from noise, such as a field-independent (FI) or a field-dependent (FD) cognitive style. We investigated the relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and in an STM probe task and both the ability to inhibit responses top-down (measured through a Stroop task) and a FI/FD cognitive style measured through the embedded figures test (EFT). We found a significant relationship between semantic interference in picture naming and cognitive style—with semantic interference increasing as a function of the degree of field dependence—but no associations with the semantic probe and the Stroop task. Our results suggest that semantic interference can be modulated by cognitive style, but not by differences in the ability to engage top-down control mechanisms, at least as measured by the Stroop task.

KW - Cognitive styles

KW - Field dependence

KW - Lexical retrieval

KW - Semantic interference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059505118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059505118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-018-5457-2

DO - 10.1007/s00221-018-5457-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059505118

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

ER -