Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer

Silvano Costa, Mario Sideri, Kari Syrjänen, Patrizia Terzano, Maria De Nuzzo, Pia De Simone, Paolo Cristiani, Alba C. Finarelli, Alessandro Bovicelli, Alessandra Zamparelli, Luciano Bovicelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The sensitivity of the Pap smear (PAP) continues to be the subject of debate. During the past several years, cervicography (CER) and HPV DNA testing have been suggested as optional tools in the screening of cervical cancer precursors. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of PAP, CER and HPV DNA testing (hybrid capture test [HCT]) in all potential combinations were evaluated in a series of 1,030 women (aged 16-70, median, 33), subjected to colposcopy (COLPO) as the reference tool. RESULTS: Of the 992 evaluable cases, 402/992 (41%) had positive COLPO (i.e., an abnormal transformation zone). Of them, 298 women underwent directed punch biopsy, while of the COLPO negative patients, 18/93 positive by at least one of the three tests had endocervical curettage. Of the 402 COLPO positive women, 146 (36%) remained negative on all tests, whereas 256 (64%) had at least one positive test. There were 84 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions and 6 invasive carcinomas. Of the former, 10 were detected by PAP alone, 4 by CER alone and 3 by HCT alone. Three of the 6 carcinomas were HCT negative. The predictive value (PPV) of a positive test was 45% for PAP, 51% for CER and 48% for HCT. The combinations of PAP with CER (for PAP negative cases) and PAP with HCT were more sensitive for CIN 2 and 3 (95% and 94%, respectively) as compared with PAP alone but were associated with a significant decrease in specificity (44% and 46% vs. 57%, respectively). However, both combinations retained a PPV (43%) similar to that of PAP alone (45%). CONCLUSION: The potential combinations of PAP with CER and with HCT were more sensitive in detecting CIN 2 and 3 as compared with PAP alone and retained a PPV similar to that of PAP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-318
Number of pages9
JournalActa Cytologica
Volume44
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Colposcopy
DNA
Neoplasms
Carcinoma
Curettage
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Cervical smears
  • Cervicography
  • Cervix neoplasms
  • Hybrid capture
  • Papillomavirus, human

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Cell Biology
  • Histology

Cite this

Costa, S., Sideri, M., Syrjänen, K., Terzano, P., De Nuzzo, M., De Simone, P., ... Bovicelli, L. (2000). Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Acta Cytologica, 44(3), 310-318.

Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. / Costa, Silvano; Sideri, Mario; Syrjänen, Kari; Terzano, Patrizia; De Nuzzo, Maria; De Simone, Pia; Cristiani, Paolo; Finarelli, Alba C.; Bovicelli, Alessandro; Zamparelli, Alessandra; Bovicelli, Luciano.

In: Acta Cytologica, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2000, p. 310-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Costa, S, Sideri, M, Syrjänen, K, Terzano, P, De Nuzzo, M, De Simone, P, Cristiani, P, Finarelli, AC, Bovicelli, A, Zamparelli, A & Bovicelli, L 2000, 'Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer', Acta Cytologica, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 310-318.
Costa S, Sideri M, Syrjänen K, Terzano P, De Nuzzo M, De Simone P et al. Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Acta Cytologica. 2000;44(3):310-318.
Costa, Silvano ; Sideri, Mario ; Syrjänen, Kari ; Terzano, Patrizia ; De Nuzzo, Maria ; De Simone, Pia ; Cristiani, Paolo ; Finarelli, Alba C. ; Bovicelli, Alessandro ; Zamparelli, Alessandra ; Bovicelli, Luciano. / Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. In: Acta Cytologica. 2000 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 310-318.
@article{57b2e873771f40ae80daf69e0f9e9c4f,
title = "Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The sensitivity of the Pap smear (PAP) continues to be the subject of debate. During the past several years, cervicography (CER) and HPV DNA testing have been suggested as optional tools in the screening of cervical cancer precursors. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of PAP, CER and HPV DNA testing (hybrid capture test [HCT]) in all potential combinations were evaluated in a series of 1,030 women (aged 16-70, median, 33), subjected to colposcopy (COLPO) as the reference tool. RESULTS: Of the 992 evaluable cases, 402/992 (41{\%}) had positive COLPO (i.e., an abnormal transformation zone). Of them, 298 women underwent directed punch biopsy, while of the COLPO negative patients, 18/93 positive by at least one of the three tests had endocervical curettage. Of the 402 COLPO positive women, 146 (36{\%}) remained negative on all tests, whereas 256 (64{\%}) had at least one positive test. There were 84 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions and 6 invasive carcinomas. Of the former, 10 were detected by PAP alone, 4 by CER alone and 3 by HCT alone. Three of the 6 carcinomas were HCT negative. The predictive value (PPV) of a positive test was 45{\%} for PAP, 51{\%} for CER and 48{\%} for HCT. The combinations of PAP with CER (for PAP negative cases) and PAP with HCT were more sensitive for CIN 2 and 3 (95{\%} and 94{\%}, respectively) as compared with PAP alone but were associated with a significant decrease in specificity (44{\%} and 46{\%} vs. 57{\%}, respectively). However, both combinations retained a PPV (43{\%}) similar to that of PAP alone (45{\%}). CONCLUSION: The potential combinations of PAP with CER and with HCT were more sensitive in detecting CIN 2 and 3 as compared with PAP alone and retained a PPV similar to that of PAP.",
keywords = "Cervical smears, Cervicography, Cervix neoplasms, Hybrid capture, Papillomavirus, human",
author = "Silvano Costa and Mario Sideri and Kari Syrj{\"a}nen and Patrizia Terzano and {De Nuzzo}, Maria and {De Simone}, Pia and Paolo Cristiani and Finarelli, {Alba C.} and Alessandro Bovicelli and Alessandra Zamparelli and Luciano Bovicelli",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "310--318",
journal = "Acta Cytologica",
issn = "0001-5547",
publisher = "Science Printers and Publishers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer

AU - Costa, Silvano

AU - Sideri, Mario

AU - Syrjänen, Kari

AU - Terzano, Patrizia

AU - De Nuzzo, Maria

AU - De Simone, Pia

AU - Cristiani, Paolo

AU - Finarelli, Alba C.

AU - Bovicelli, Alessandro

AU - Zamparelli, Alessandra

AU - Bovicelli, Luciano

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The sensitivity of the Pap smear (PAP) continues to be the subject of debate. During the past several years, cervicography (CER) and HPV DNA testing have been suggested as optional tools in the screening of cervical cancer precursors. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of PAP, CER and HPV DNA testing (hybrid capture test [HCT]) in all potential combinations were evaluated in a series of 1,030 women (aged 16-70, median, 33), subjected to colposcopy (COLPO) as the reference tool. RESULTS: Of the 992 evaluable cases, 402/992 (41%) had positive COLPO (i.e., an abnormal transformation zone). Of them, 298 women underwent directed punch biopsy, while of the COLPO negative patients, 18/93 positive by at least one of the three tests had endocervical curettage. Of the 402 COLPO positive women, 146 (36%) remained negative on all tests, whereas 256 (64%) had at least one positive test. There were 84 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions and 6 invasive carcinomas. Of the former, 10 were detected by PAP alone, 4 by CER alone and 3 by HCT alone. Three of the 6 carcinomas were HCT negative. The predictive value (PPV) of a positive test was 45% for PAP, 51% for CER and 48% for HCT. The combinations of PAP with CER (for PAP negative cases) and PAP with HCT were more sensitive for CIN 2 and 3 (95% and 94%, respectively) as compared with PAP alone but were associated with a significant decrease in specificity (44% and 46% vs. 57%, respectively). However, both combinations retained a PPV (43%) similar to that of PAP alone (45%). CONCLUSION: The potential combinations of PAP with CER and with HCT were more sensitive in detecting CIN 2 and 3 as compared with PAP alone and retained a PPV similar to that of PAP.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The sensitivity of the Pap smear (PAP) continues to be the subject of debate. During the past several years, cervicography (CER) and HPV DNA testing have been suggested as optional tools in the screening of cervical cancer precursors. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of PAP, CER and HPV DNA testing (hybrid capture test [HCT]) in all potential combinations were evaluated in a series of 1,030 women (aged 16-70, median, 33), subjected to colposcopy (COLPO) as the reference tool. RESULTS: Of the 992 evaluable cases, 402/992 (41%) had positive COLPO (i.e., an abnormal transformation zone). Of them, 298 women underwent directed punch biopsy, while of the COLPO negative patients, 18/93 positive by at least one of the three tests had endocervical curettage. Of the 402 COLPO positive women, 146 (36%) remained negative on all tests, whereas 256 (64%) had at least one positive test. There were 84 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions and 6 invasive carcinomas. Of the former, 10 were detected by PAP alone, 4 by CER alone and 3 by HCT alone. Three of the 6 carcinomas were HCT negative. The predictive value (PPV) of a positive test was 45% for PAP, 51% for CER and 48% for HCT. The combinations of PAP with CER (for PAP negative cases) and PAP with HCT were more sensitive for CIN 2 and 3 (95% and 94%, respectively) as compared with PAP alone but were associated with a significant decrease in specificity (44% and 46% vs. 57%, respectively). However, both combinations retained a PPV (43%) similar to that of PAP alone (45%). CONCLUSION: The potential combinations of PAP with CER and with HCT were more sensitive in detecting CIN 2 and 3 as compared with PAP alone and retained a PPV similar to that of PAP.

KW - Cervical smears

KW - Cervicography

KW - Cervix neoplasms

KW - Hybrid capture

KW - Papillomavirus, human

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17044449045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17044449045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10833984

AN - SCOPUS:17044449045

VL - 44

SP - 310

EP - 318

JO - Acta Cytologica

JF - Acta Cytologica

SN - 0001-5547

IS - 3

ER -